F: 1.5 M5.Cat.Geology2
.8/21/19) 7:26PM)
1. The Time Detectives
2. Worzel's Deep-Sea Ash is Volcanic
3. Punching A Hole In The Asteroid Hypothesis
4. More Doubts About Asteroids
5. Chemical Surprises At The K-T Boundary
6. The Cretaceous Incineration
7. Looking For The Smoking Gun
8. Tektites, Wildfires and the Extinction of the Dinosaurs
9. Microorganisms Complicate The K-t Boundary
10. Asteroid Impact Or Volcanos?
11. Iridium And Mass Extinctions
12. Iceland And The Iridium Layer
13. Global Fire At The K-t Boundary
14. The Rehabilitation Of Cuvier
15. Did an asteroid impact trigger the ice ages?
16. A QUESTIONABLE 200-MILLION-YEAR HIATUS
17. "HIGH"-TECH FARMING AT TIAHUANACO
18. Flotsam On The Great Sand Sea
19. Two Tsumani Tales
20. Iridium-rich Layers And Catastrophism
21. Everglades Astrobleme?
22. Of Dust Clouds And Ice Ages
23. Do large meteors/comets come in cycles?
24. Terrestrial Maria?
25. Looking For The Smoking Gun
26. An Antarctic Bone Bed
27. An Arkansas Tsunami Deposit?
28. The changing magnetic climate: does it affect civilizations?
29. Mud Springs Regurgitate Ancient Fossils
30. The Burgess Shale Puzzle
31. A Permian Polar Forest
32. An Antarctic Bone Bed
33. The Karoo: The Greatest Vertebrate Graveyard
34. Bone Bed Discovered In Florida
35. The Whale-on-its-tail Fossil
36. Biology Heavy
37. The Continuing Ica Mystery
38A. Common Sense About Ancient Maps
38B. Old World Maps - - A Response to Charles Ginenthal
38C. Analysis Of Old World Maps
39. Is Space A Superconducting Medium?
40. Ice Core Evidence
41. New Scenarios for Solar System Evolution
42. The Solar System and Electro-Gravitic Theory
43. Society News
44. Sea Level Changes
See re staining etc of drift, loess etc
www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=10&p=128545#p128545K/T
[DRYAS: EROSION]
1. The Time Detectives by Brian Fagan (Reviewed) [SIS C&C Review]
_From: SIS Chronology& Catastrophism Review 2001:2 (Jan 2002) Home¦ Issue Contents The Time Detectives by Brian Fagan (Simon& Schuster, 1995) Reviewed by Phillip Clapham
_For anyone interested in the history of humans beyond the narrow confines of written documentation this is a 'must have'. The author is well known and the archaeological sleuth work he writes about is scintillating. If you like television's Time Team programmes, you will like this book. It is also relevant to SIS members. For instance, at an SIS discussion group meeting a couple of summers back someone asked when had the Sahara actually become a desert and how this affected ancient Egyptian civilisation. On p. 100, Fagan catalogues climate changes in the region and explains why, for a few thousand years, the ____Sahara became an agreeable place to live. Rainfall became plentiful, leading to the creation of shallow lakes and wide swathes of open grassland. Wadis, now bone dry, tumbled with water and there is evidence of human settlement, on a seasonal but regular basis. People lived and thrived in regions that are now almost devoid of life. The climate changed around 4000BC; it seems the rainfall altered. Fagan claims the monsoon track, became narrower, or possibly moved southwards. The Sahara, thenceforth, became gradually more inhospitable and arid. Note that this happed during the pre-Dynastic era and was actually instrumental in the development of irrigation farming in the Nile Valley; the Sahara was already in the process of drying out during the Old Kingdom. This of course brings up an interesting controversy: the real age of the Sphinx. It seems to display evidence of erosion due to heavy and persistent rainfall. When can this have happened? Hancock and others, such as Bauval, claim it must have happened before the Old Kingdom, clearly plugging into the same climatology as Fagan. Archaeology has revealed that at the end of the Old Kingdom, especially during the First Intermediate Period, low Nile flood levels associated with famine and hardship paralysed Egypt. The same sort of thing happened, much later, at the end of the New Kingdom, in the immediate post-Late Bronze Age. Here, however, we have textual evidence (e.g. from the Harris papyrus) that Egypt experienced a phase of luxurious vegetation and verdant growth in the early years of Ramesses III. However, later in his reign a phase of low Nile flood levels associated with famine and hardship set in - and this prevailed for most of Dynasty 20. Hence, we might wonder if a similar situation happened at the end of the Old Kingdom period, brought about by a similar set of circumstances - e.g. an exploding bolide in the atmosphere, or an unusually large volcanic eruption. The recipe might have included an interjection of great heat - or blast, which in turn ____may have evaporated great amounts of oceanic water - and what goes up also comes down, possibly in the form of a downpour that went on for weeks, or even months. Just a thought. See p. 103 for up to date refined C 14 dating methodology. See p. 108 for the Younger Dryas Episode (essential reading for catastrophists) - a significant climatic event triggered by an extremely cold blip far more serious than anything recognised by dendrochronologists in the historical period. The cold blip was followed, as always, by a very dry period in the Near East, so humans sought out oasis locations - e.g. Jericho. In places such as this agriculture is thought to have begun. More importantly, ____at the end of the Younger Dryas, when climate returned to normality, the fledgling farmers spread rapidly through the Near East, Iran and Asia Minor - and the rest is history. Hence, we have a very early catastrophic event, similar in outline but apparently more severe in nature than the events that brought the Old and New Kingdoms to an end. This seems to support the late Fred Hoyle's idea that the even earlier end of the Ice Age was brought about by a comet interacting with Earth (and the Ice Ages themselves may also have been inaugurated by a cosmic body). Time Detectives investigates a variety of peoples and locations, such as the Anasazi people of the Pueblos and the Chumash of California. The latter developed a society adapted to fishing and Fagan describes how archaeology has catalogued their gradual transition from hunter-gatherers into a progressively more technical boat-builders. As the population grew, the annual catch had to keep pace. During phases of climatic anomaly, the fish shoals changed their habitat and the Chumash had to hurriedly adapt, building boats to go further out to sea. Fagan also claims there is evidence of syphilis endemic among the Chumash hundreds of years before contact with Europeans, contrary to recent claims that seek to trace spread of the disease in the opposite direction. There is another chapter devoted to 'early farmers' and the theories of Marxist historian, Vere Gordon Childe. He saw civilisation developing in a logical sequence and claimed agriculture and metallurgy had origins in either Egypt or Mesopotamia. His theory was influential not long ago and indeed, it became the status quo. Aspects of it are still persuasive and Fagan's views are an example of this. Childe committed suicide due to depression, apparently laid low by the fact his reputation and his life's work were under attack by a new and younger generation with different ideas. Childe may have given up the ghost but catastrophism provides a twist to his theory, the repetitive climatic blips that accelerated and encouraged people to adopt methods of controlling their food resources. Fire may also have played a role. On p. 153 and chapter 7, with the intriguing title, 'Searching for Eden', ____the ancient land of Sumer and its geology and geography is discussed. It was clearly once a bountiful land and reed boats were adopted as a general means of transportation. A chequered landscape of hundreds of irrigation canals and green fields has vanished, the soil fertility has disappeared and the coastline of the Gulf itself has changed dramatically. Oil exploration and field research has led to extensive geological mapping of the region. It seems the Gulf is a surprisingly shallow sea. ____It was not until around 6500BC that the sea actually flooded what had been essentially a fault line, a canyon through which the river ran to the Indian Ocean. This is [ ... ] now a submerged marine feature but ____it reminded me of the formation of the North Sea. This too began as a fault line along which the Rhine and its tributaries emptied. Like the Gulf, the North Sea is supposed to have formed gradually as sea levels rose after the Ice Age. Is it a coincidence that at ____around 6500BC England was split from France, chalk cliffs of both sides of the channel opening up in what seems to have an abrupt and catastrophic event? At the head of the newly-formed Gulf ____a large marine estuary formed where the marshes and delta of the Tigris and Euphrates rivers now lie. In 5000BC the estuary reached its most northerly point of expansion, near ancient Ur. After 4000BC lower precipitation levels came into play, leading to the development of irrigation agriculture, which was labour intensive and required an expanding population. However, irrigation increased crop yields, so the region could sustain a rapid rise in population and cities came into being. Sumerians also colonised nearby lands such as the Zagros foothills and Euphrates and Tigris river valleys, almost as far as Syria etc. All in all, a lot of useful information for an understanding of human development in the last 10,000 years. Phillip Clapham
[: SEDIMENT, CLAY]
2. Worzel's Deep-Sea Ash is Volcanic [Catastrophism Geology]
_From: Catastrophist Geology Year 2 No. 1 (June 1977) Home¦ Issue Contents ____Worzel's Deep-Sea Ash is Volcanic Johan B. Kloosterman RIO DE JANEIRO
_In the December '76 issue of this journal I asked for additional information regarding a layer of white ash discovered in 1959 in the equatorial eastern Pacific (1). This discovery (2) received then some comments (3,4), but soon afterward sunk into oblivion. I have received the requested information through letters from J.L. Worzel, E. Anders and D. Ninkovich. In addition to the work mentioned above, Dr. Edward Anders conducted some supplemental work in the period immediately following the discovery (see his letter reproduced hereunder). Further research concerning this white ash layer has only recently been published (5,6), the time-lag probably being due to the fact that only a few years ago more samples, taken during cruises of the Vema, Conrad and De Steiguer, have become available from the area. During the cruises which Worzel's discovery instigated, more than 20 reflectors were found to be present in the top 100 meters of sediment. The upper layers were sampled to depths of 18m below the ocean bottom. Bowles et al.(1973), making a comparative study of the ash layers, examined all deepsea cores available from the study area in terms of their trace - and minor elements composition, refraction index and mineral content, and were able to identify 13 different ash layers. They singled out 3 principal areas of deposition: northern, central and southern. Contrary to original assumptions, the layers are limited to the equatorial eastern Pacific, and no single ash layer blankets the entire region. One layer ("D") is usually uppermost in the central area, while the same is true of another ash layer ("L") in most of the southern area; together they constitute what had been designated the "Worzel Ash". Layer "L" has been studied in some detail by Ninkovich and Shackleton (1975). This layer is present in cores taken off the coasts of Colombia and Peru, but it is absent near the Galapagos Islands (while there are other ash layers present to the west of these islands). Thus, distribution alone points clearly to one of the volcanoes of southern Colombia and Ecuador as the source of this layer. A K-Ar age determination of this layer had previously given about 900,000 years (7) but Ninkovich and Shackleton (6), relying on 39-Ar/40-Ar measurements and on biostratigraphic and oxygen-isotopic considerations, give a tentative age of 230,000 [+/-]10,000 years. In July of 1959 I made some preliminary measurements of the ?-? coincidence spectrum on a sample of Worzel ash that Professor Worzel had sent me. These indicated a substantial content of uranium and thorium, so high as to preclude direct measurement of cosmic-ray-induced aluminum-26. It was therefore necessary to separate the aluminum chemically before counting. The net counting time of sample and background was about fifteen days. The result was negative; there was no evidence for cosmic-ray-induced Al-26 radioactivity. The counting rate was (-0.48 1.09) x 10^-3 c/min, which corresponds to an Al-26 disintegration rate of <= 7.5 dpm/kg (two sigma upper limit). The expected activity, for cosmic-ray exposure similar to that of meteorites, is 131 dpm/kg, allowing for some decay of Al-26 in the ~10^5 years since the ash was laid down. This result can be interpreted in either of two ways. ____If the ash had ever existed in outer space in sufficiently dispersed form to become strongly irradiated by cosmic rays, its "exposure" or "flight" time is ____<= 63,000 years. Such an exposure time is too short for an extraterrestrial origin, except from the Moon. But the Moon has been well explored since 1969, and contains no rocks resembling the Worzel ash. On the other hand, ____if it existed in space as part of a solid body and if my ash sample represents a true average, the radius of this body must have-been >= 15 meters. This is not an interesting limit, however, because ____the extent of the ash deposit alone implies a radius of at least 5 km. Thus ____an origin from a terrestrial volcano is virtually certain, as previously favored by Worzel on various grounds. It is still true of course, that the vast extent of the ash deposit calls for a huge eruption, but I do not think that poses any difficulties. I also add several analytical results on the samples. The following table gives some trace element concentrations, as determined by neutron activation analysis at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The ____low scandium content of the ash is intriguing. U (ppm) Sc(ppm) In (ppm) Ir (ppm) Clay above Worzel layer 1.72; 1.40 1.0 <0.5 <5 x 10 -4 Clay below Worzel layer 3.82; 3.93 0.57 <0.5 <5 x 10 -4 Worzel ash 4.68; 4.68 0.058 <0.5 <5 x 10 -4 Ash from Concepcion 1.42; 1.63 0.58 <0.5 <5 x 10 -4 Volcano, Nicaragua In addition, Dr A.DuFresne of our Geology Department made spectrographic analyses of these materials: SiO 2 CaO FeO Al 2 0 3 Na 2 O TiO 2 MgO Total Clay above 59% 0.96% 3.2% 15.8% 4.3% 0.42% 2.25% 85.91% Worzel Ash 75% 0.88% 0.66% 13.9% 3.9% 0.20% 0.03% 94.64% Clay below 40% 3.2% 5.2% 15.8% 4.4% 3.52% .52% 72.78%
_Figure 1. Location of cores taken in study area. Three principle areas of ash deposition (northern, central and southern) are outlined with solid lines. After Bowles et al, 1973.+ Location of "D" layer sample analysed by E. Anders and A. DuFresne (see p.4).
_The "D" layer is the most extensive (400,000 sq.kms) and voluminous (43 cu.km) single ash layer. Bowles et al.(5) traced it through much of the northern and central areas, and found that it even extends into the southern area. In the central area, off the coasts of El Salvador, Nicaragua and Costa Rica, it forms the uppermost ash layer, while to the north some minor layers are present above it. A tentative age of the "D" layer, based on biostratigraphic considerations, is given as 50,000 to 60,000 years. A K-Ar date of 500,000 [+/-]5,000 years (7) is judged "considerably too old" by Bowles et al., and attributed to either contamination by atmospheric Ar or incomplete outgassing of the lava, causing radiogenic Ar to be present. As a possible source of some of the deeper layers ("I") are given the Ilopango and Boquer6n volcanoes in El Salvador, whose eruptions formed the impressive Tierra Blanca tephra deposits of central El Salvador, whereas the "D" layer is tentatively attributed to the pelean domes of the Tecum Umin Ridge in the Highlands of Guatemala, where pumice deposits are overlain by ignimbrites dated at 31,000 [+/-]3,000 years. Acknowledgements. Many thanks for help in obtaining data, references and reprints go to: Dr Edward Anders, Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, USA; Dr Dragaslov Ninkovich, Lambert-Doherty Geological Observatory, Palisades, NY, USA; Prof.J.Lamar Worzel, Marine Science Institute, University of Texas, Galveston, USA.
_References
1. Kloosterman J.B., 1976: What has happened to Worzel's Deep-sea Ash? Catastr. Geol.(2): 18-19.
2. Worzel J.L., 1959: Extensive deep sea sub-bottom reflections identified as white ash. Proc.Nat.Acad.Sci., 45: 349-355.
3. Ewing M., Heezen B.C.
[: IRIDIUM, CLAY]
3. Punching A Hole In The Asteroid Hypothesis [Science Frontiers Website]
_Science Frontiers ONLINE No. 26: Mar-Apr 1983 Issue Contents Other pages Home Page Science Frontiers Online All Issues This Issue Sourcebook Project Sourcebook Subjects Punching A Hole In The Asteroid Hypothesis
_Scientists have long searched for a cause for the profound geological and biological changes that apparently occurred between the Cretaceous and Tertiary periods. When an ((__iridium__))-rich layer was found in several areas at this important boundary, many claimed it as proof of an asteroid impact or some other catastrophism that would nicely explain the massive worldwide changes that occurred. With this preamble in mind, consider the following abstract from an article in Science: "Analyses of the clay mineralogy of samples from the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary layer at four localities show that the ____boundary clay is neither mineralogically exotic nor distinct from locally derived clays above and below the boundary. The significant ejecta component in the clay that is predicted by the asteroid impact scenario was not detected." (Rampino, Michael R., and Reynolds, Robert C.; "Clay Mineralogy of the Cretaceous-Tertiary Boundary Clay," Science, 219:1983.) From Science Frontiers #26, MAR-APR 1983.© 1983-2000 William R. Corliss
[: IRIDIUM, SEDIMENT, CLAY]
4. More Doubts About Asteroids [Science Frontiers Website]
_Science Frontiers ONLINE No. 37: Jan-Feb 1985 Issue Contents Other pages Home Page Science Frontiers Online All Issues This Issue Sourcebook Project Sourcebook Subjects More Doubts About Asteroids
_In an apparent reaction to the stampede to climb aboard the extinction-by-asteroid bandwagon, dissenting papers have begun to appear in the scientific literature. For example, Van Valen's list of objections to the hypothesis of asteroid impact at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary was reproduced in the last issue of Science Frontiers. Now, in a recent issue of New Scientist, T. Hallam raises still more objections: Tropical plants, mammals, crocodiles, birds, and benthic invertebrates were little affected by whatever happened at the Cretaceous-Tertiary interface. Furthermore, many groups that were extinguished were already well into a decline. Some geologists insist that some of the supposedly synchronous extinctions were probably separated by several hundred thousand years; viz., plankton and dinosaurs. The vaunted ((__iridium__)) anomaly in deep-sea cores is spread through a considerable thickness of sediment. Even after allowing for the mixing of sediments, the ((__iridium__))-rich layer is thousands of years thick. According to the asteroid scenario, the clay layer separating the Cretaceous from the Tertiary should represent the fallout from impact-raised dust, which would include asteroidal material and a mixed sample of earth rocks. However, in Denmark, the boundary is marked by the so-called Fish Clay, which is almost pure smectite - - a single mineral and not a mixture of terrestrial rock flour. If it wasn't an asteroid impact, ____why the ((__iridium__)) concentration? At least three hypotheses have been proposed to circumvent the asteroid debacle: (1) volcanic activity; (2) a concentration of micrometeorites, thousands of tons of which fall each day, through extreme reduction of sedimentation; and (3) selective enrichment of ((__iridium__)) by an anoxic environment acting upon kerogenand pyrite-rich clay. In short, some geologists at least do not find the asteroid hypothesis compelling at the moment. (Hallam, Tony; "Asteroids and Extinction - - No Cause for Concern," New Scientist, p. 30, November 8, 1984.)
[: IRIDIUM, SEDIMENT, CLAY]
5. Chemical Surprises At The K-T Boundary [Science Frontiers Website]
_Science Frontiers ONLINE No. 65: Sep-Oct 1989 Issue Contents Other pages Home Page Science Frontiers Online All Issues This Issue Sourcebook Project Sourcebook Subjects Chemical surprises at the k-t boundary
_The presence of high ((__iridium__)) concentrations at the Cretaceous-Tertiary (K-T) boundary, some 65 million years ago, has led to the widely accepted notion that an extraterrestrial projectile slammed into the earth at that time, wreaking geological and biological havoc. But the K-T boundary is anything but simple chemically and paleontologically. To illustrate, J.L. Bada and M. Zhao have found unusual amino acids in sediments laid down before and after this geological time marker. "They find that Danish sediments spanning the narrow boundary layer ____contain two amino acids, alpha-aminoisobutyric acid and isovaline, that are relatively uncommon in biological materials but abundant in the organic-rich meteorites. They suggest that the body which collided with Earth 65 million years ago and left the telltale ((__iridium__)) residue may have been organic-rich, perhaps like a C-type asteroid or a comet. Such a possibility has interesting implications for the extinction and related atmospheric effects, and supports the idea that impact events could have supplied the Earth during a much earlier period with the raw materials for organic chemical evolution." Actually, the above quotation is pretty much in line with present mainstream thinking. Perhaps so, but Bada and Zhao identified two troubling anomalies. First, the amounts of amino acids found were surprisingly high. How could these complex molecules survive the searing temperatures engendered by high-velocity impact? Second, the amino acids may be abundant tens of centimeters above and below the K-T boundary clay containing the ((__iridium__)), but they are virtually absent in the clay itself! (Cronin, John R.; "Amino Acids and Bolide Impacts," Nature, 339:423, 1989, Also: Monastersky, R.; "Rare Amino Acids Support Impact Theory," Science News, 135:356, 1989.) Reference. Chemical anomalies at stratigraphic boundaries are cataloged in ESC1 in Anomalies in Geology. To order this volume, visit: here. From Science Frontiers #65, SEP-OCT 1989.© 1989-2000 William R. Corliss
[: IRIDIUM, CLAY]
6. The Cretaceous Incineration [Science Frontiers Website]
_Science Frontiers ONLINE No. 43: Jan-Feb 1986 Issue Contents Other pages Home Page Science Frontiers Online All Issues This Issue Sourcebook Project Sourcebook Subjects The Cretaceous Incineration
_The worldwide deposit of ((__iridium__)) at the end of the Cretaceous implies, to many at least, that the great biological extinctions of this period were the consequence of a meteorite impact. It has now been discovered that clay samples from the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary also contain 0.36-0.58% graphitic carbon. It is fluffy stuff and suggests that the planet was once covered by a thick layer of soot. Quantitatively, the soot layer is equivalent to the carbon in 10% of the earth's present biomass. The authors speculate that this soot was created by huge wildfires that consumed much of the earth's vegetation and perhaps fossil fuel as well. Terrestrial life was, of course, devastated - - just as it is in the currently popular "nuclear winter" scenarios. The end-of-the-Cretaceous soot is in fact, thicker and more widely spread than nuclear winter theories predict. (Wolbach, Wendy S., et al; "Cretaceous Extinctions: Evidence for Wildfires and Search for Meteoric Material," Science, 230:167, 1985.)
_Comment. Questions arise, though: How could a single meteorite impact ignite worldwide wildfires? Why haven't other meteorite impacts, recorded abundantly by large craters and astroblemes, also set fire to the planet and left iridium layers? From Science Frontiers #43, JAN-FEB 1986.© 1986-2000 William R. Corliss
[: IRIDIUM, SEDIMENT, CLAY]
7. Looking For The Smoking Gun [Science Frontiers Website]
_Science Frontiers ONLINE No. 75: May-Jun 1991 Issue Contents Other pages Home Page Science Frontiers Online All Issues This Issue Sourcebook Project Sourcebook Subjects Looking For The Smoking Gun
_We already know the victims (the dinosaurs and other fauna and flora), and there is considerable evidence that the bullet was a cosmic projectile of some sort. The absence of a smoking gun (a sufficiently large terrestrial crater with an age of 65 million years) has allowed volcanists to deny the cosmic catastrophists a complete victory. However, the recent identification of tektite-like glasses at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary (KTB) on Haiti is leading geological detectives closer and closer to the missing crater. Elsewhere in the world, the KTB is characterized by an ((__iridium__)) anomaly and a thin layer of "impact clay" consisting of tiny bits of shocked minerals. ____At Beloc, on Haiti, though, geologists find a 55-centimeter-thick layer of glassy debris. Approximately 25% of this stratum consists of 1-6-millimeter particles of tektite-like glass. Most of the glass particles are spherical, but a few have the splash-forms and dumbbell shapes of bona fide tektites. The thickness of the Haitian deposit and the large sizes of the particles suggest that ____the smoking gun must be nearby. Ironically, the Haiti stratum was originally classified as of volcanic origin; and we must add that we are presenting here only the conclusions of the asteroid school. But where oh where is this crater? The Manson crater in Iowa (now buried) is of the right age but too small. The best candidate so far is buried in northern Yucatan. The Chicxulub crater is discernible on gravity - and magneticanomaly maps and is probably of the right age. Only drilling will confirm the guilt of the suspect. Even if Chicxulub is the culprit, much debate prevails over exactly how the dinosaurs were done in. Was it a "cosmic winter" due to dust intercepting sunlight? Or perhaps a "cosmic summer" resulting from a super-greenhouse effect caused by: (1) impact-released methane trapped in sediments, and (2) the CO2 from zapped carbonate rocks. (Smit, Jan; "Where Did It Happen?" Nature, 349:461, 1991, and Sigurdsson, Haraldur, et al; "Glass from the Cretaceous/Tertiary Boundary in Haiti," Nature, 349:482, 1991.) Reference Section ETC in catalog Carolina Bays, Mima Mounds is devoted entirely to impact craters. Ordering data here. From Science Frontiers #75, MAY-JUN 1991.© 1991-2000 William R. Corliss
[: IRIDIUM, CLAY]
8. Tektites, Wildfires and the Extinction of the Dinosaurs [SIS C&C Workshop]
_From: SIS Chronology and Catastrophism Workshop 1987 No 1 (Sep 1987) Home¦ Issue Contents Tektites, Wildfires and the Extinction of the Dinosaurs by Trevor Palmer
_Several recent discoveries have strengthened the argument that a global catastrophe occurred 65 million years ago (by conventional dating), bringing to a close the Cretaceous Period and wiping out the dinosaurs and many other groups of living creatures. As discussed in SIS Review VII:A, pp.9-20, the Alvarez team produced the first scientifically acceptable evidence of the cause, in the form of an ((__iridium__)) abundance anomaly at the Cretaceous-Tertiary (C-T) boundary. This could have resulted from the impact of an asteroid or comet, or from volcanic action. Which was it? ____Shocked quartz grains found by Bruce Bohor and colleagues of the U.S. Geological Survey seemed almost conclusive evidence of an impact at this time. Even staunch opponents of the impact hypothesis as Dartmouth College, New Hampshire, geologists Charles Officer and Charles Drake admitted that the characteristics of these crystals were different from those known to have resulted from internal pressures during volcanic activity[1. However, they then went on to argue that there was insufficient evidence to conclude that the crystals could not in any circumstances have been caused by internal overpressures. In their view, the evidence as a whole was "in accord with the scenario of a series of intense eruptive volcanic events occurring during a relatively short geologic time interval (10,000 to 100,000 years) and not with the scenario of a single large asteroid impact event"[1. In contrast, Jan Smit, geologist at the University of California in Los Angeles, and colleagues concluded from a study of many samples from ocean floor drill cores and land-based sections that the C-T boundary "appears synchronous worldwide"[2. They also found microtektite-like particles at the position of the iridium abundance anomaly in each of the samples, which at least partially answers Bernard Newgrosh, who asked in SIS Review VII:A, p.8, whether the apparent absence of tektites before the last 35 million years ruled out the possibility of earlier extinctions being caused by impacts. Smit wrote in conclusion, "Only a major impact with all its environmental consequences seems capable of explaining all lithological, trace element and biological evidence"[2. Another round of articles by these various authors confirmed their original views[3,4,5. The Alvarez group concluded in favour of an impact rather than a volcanic cause after a mineralogical study of the C-T boundary clay[6, and Guy Leahy and his colleagues from the Department of Geology, University of Oregon, believe that "at the moment the asteroid impact hypothesis provides the most parsimonious explanation for changes in plant communities across the C-T boundary"[7. Other groups have similarly concluded that the record of vegetation changes supports the impact hypothesis[8,9. Wendy Wolbach and colleagues of the University of Chicago found fluffy aggregates of graphitic carbon at the C-T boundary at several sites, apparently an indication of a worldwide layer of soot[10. The most likely cause seemed to be wildfires triggered by an impact. The amount of soot produced would have been immense, equivalent to 10% of the present biomass of the Earth, and "could have greatly enhanced the darkening and cooling of the earth by rock dust, which has been suggested as a cause of the extinctions". The particle size distribution of the soot is similar to that assumed for the smoke cloud of "nuclear winter", but the global distribution is more uniform and the amounts are much greater[10. Nevertheless, it seems unlikely that the events at the end of the Cretaceous Period will ever be seen to have a simple explanation. There may well have been not one impact but several [11, which would fit in with the data presented by Officer and Drake. Attempts to show that species died out rapidly in response to an impact are limited by the nature of the evidence. The Berkeley palaeontologist Lowell Dingus has argued that "although catastrophic amounts of extinction might have occurred at the C-T transition, it seems unlikely that we can distinguish episodes of extinction lasting 100 years or less from episodes lasting as long as 100,000 years. Consequently, acceptance of catastrophic hypotheses based on these stratigraphic records seem improbably optimistic at this time[12. In fact, although some groups may have died out more or less instantaneously, the extinction of other groups may have taken place over a million or more years [2,11,13,14. Clearly, there is much work still to be done.
_References.
1. C. B. Officer and C. L. Drake, "Terminal Cretaceous environmental events", Science 227 (1985), pp.1161-7
2. J. Smit and A. J. T. Romein, "A sequence of events across the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary", Earth and Planetary Science Letters 74 (1985), pp.155-70
3. B. F. Bohor, P. J. Modreski and E. E. Foord, "
[: IRIDIUM, SEDIMENT]
9. Microorganisms Complicate The K-t Boundary [Science Frontiers Website]
_Science Frontiers ONLINE No. 67: Jan-Feb 1990 Issue Contents Other pages Home Page Science Frontiers Online All Issues This Issue Sourcebook Project Sourcebook Subjects Microorganisms complicate the k-t boundary
_Ancient bacteria, it appears, have tampered with the K-T (Cretaceous-Tertiary) boundary of some 65 million years ago. A key marker of this boundary is a thin "spike" of ((__iridium__)) that is found worldwide, and which was supposedly deposited by the asteroid impact that helped finish off the dinosaurs. For many scientists, the asteroid-impact scenario has become a "non-negotiable" brick in the Temple of Science. The problem they have faced is that the ((__iridium__)) layer is variable in thickness and concentration from site to site. Sometimes ((__iridium__)) can be detected well above and below the K-T boundary. This variability has tended to undermine the asteroid-impact theory. Recent experiments at Wheaton College by B.D. Dyer et al have demonstrated that bacteria in ground water can both concentrate and disperse ((__iridium__)) deposits. In other words, bacteria could smear out an ((__iridium__)) spike, perhaps partially erase it, or even move it to a deeper or shallower layer of sediment. (Monastersky, R.; "Microbes Complicate the K-T Mystery," Science News, 136: 341, 1989.)
_Comment. An obvious question now is how bacteria might have affected other chemicals, such as oxygen and carbon isotopes, widely used in stratigraphy. From Science Frontiers #67, JAN-FEB 1990.© 1990-2000 William R. Corliss
[: IRIDIUM, SEDIMENT]
10. Asteroid Impact Or Volcanos? [Science Frontiers Website]
_Science Frontiers ONLINE No. 73: Jan-Feb 1991 Issue Contents Other pages Home Page Science Frontiers Online All Issues This Issue Sourcebook Project Sourcebook Subjects Asteroid impact or volcanos?
_The debate over the real cause of the terrestrial catastrophism that occurred at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary, some 65 million years ago, grinds on. Some physical scientists claim rather imperiously that the dinosaurs and many other species were done in by the impact of a huge asteroid/meteorite. The worldwide ((__iridium__)) spike is conclusive, they say. Many paleontologists and geologists, however, remain unconvinced and prefer widespread volcanism. We have already covered the various arguments in past issues of Science Frontiers; here, we want to advise our readers that a pair of excellent articles by principals in this debate have appeared in Scientific American. Generally speaking, it seems that the proponents of the impact theory are now listening to the other side. For example, multiple impacts are now proposed to account for evidence of the type introduced below. (Alvarez, Walter, and Asaro, Frank; "An Extraterrestrial Impact," Scientific American, 263:78, October 1990. Also: Courtillot, Vincent E.; "A Volcanic Eruption," Scientific American, 263:85, October 1990.) A spike dulled. The case for a single asteroid/meteorite impact has been weakened by a recent reexamination of the classic exposure of the CretaceousTertiary boundary at Gubbio, Italy. Here, the discovery of an iridium "spike" at the boundary was thought to betoken a sudden, catastrophic, extraterrestrial event. On further study, though, the spike no longer seems so sharp. In fact, it is spread through about 3 meters of sediments at the boundary. Said sediments apparently took 500,000 years to accumulate! This broad smear of iridium no longer seems indicative of a single extraterrestrial impact. (Rocchia, R., et al; "The CretaceousTertiary Boundary at Gubbio Revisited: Vertical Extent of the Ir Anomaly," Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 99:206, 1990.)
_Comment. Is it even indicative of multiple impacts? Recall that no one has yet (1990) found a single crater that everyone will accept as evidence. Reference. Iridium spikes and the supposed Cretaceous-Tertiary impact are to be found in ESB1 in our catalog: Anomalies in Geology. For more on this volume, see: here. From Science Frontiers #73, JAN-FEB 1991.© 1991-2000 William R. Corliss
[: IRIDIUM, SEDIMENT]
11. Iridium And Mass Extinctions [Science Frontiers Website]
_Science Frontiers ONLINE No. 8: Fall 1979 Issue Contents Other pages Home Page Science Frontiers Online All Issues This Issue Sourcebook Project Sourcebook Subjects Iridium And Mass Extinctions Alvarez and his colleagues at the University of California, while chemically analyzing a series of sedimentary strata from Italy, discovered that one layer had 25 times the concentration of ((__iridium__)) residing in adjacent strata. The ((__iridium__))-rich layer forms the boundary between the Cretaceous and Tertiary periods, 65 million years ago. During that death-filled interval, 50% of the earth's genera were wiped out. Such are the two correlated facts: ((__iridium__)) increase and mass extinction. But do they have the same cause? Alvarez et al point out that ((__iridium__)) is rare on earth but much more common out in space. The anomalous concentration of ((__iridium__)) could have been injected by a massive solar flare, a big meteor impact, or some other extraterrestrial catastrophe. Thus is catastrophism being resurrected. (Anonymous; "An Iridium Clue to the Dinosaur's Demise," New Scientist, 82: 798, 1979.) From Science Frontiers #8, Fall 1979.© 1979-2000 William R. Corliss
[: IRIDIUM]
12. Iceland And The Iridium Layer [Science Frontiers Website]
_Science Frontiers ONLINE No. 15: Spring 1981 Issue Contents Other pages Home Page Science Frontiers Online All Issues This Issue Sourcebook Project Sourcebook Subjects Iceland And The Iridium Layer
_The high concentration of ((__iridium__)) between the Cretaceous and Tertiary eras (about 65 million years ago) is widely interpreted as indicating a worldwide catastrophe caused by the impact of a comet or meteor. The increase of ((__iridium__)) concentration over normal levels is much higher in northern latitudes, suggesting that the impact point is in this region. But no impact scar of the proper size and age exists. However, if one looks for scabs rather than scars, one finds that Iceland is formed entirely of volcanic rocks younger than the Cretaceous. To Fred Whipple of the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, these facts dovetail nicely. Iceland was formed by magma welling up from a 100-km hole in the sea floor blasted out by a 10-km meteor. (Anonymous; "The Blow That Gave Birth to Iceland?" New Scientist, 89:740, 1981.) From Science Frontiers #15, Spring 1981.© 1981-2000 William R. Corliss
[: IRIDIUM, SEDIMENT: CLAY]
13. Global Fire At The K-t Boundary [Science Frontiers Website]
_Science Frontiers ONLINE No. 60: Nov-Dec 1988 Issue Contents Other pages Home Page Science Frontiers Online All Issues This Issue Sourcebook Project Sourcebook Subjects Global fire at the k-t boundary
_The worldwide deposit of ((__iridium__)) at the K-T (Cretaceous-Tertiary) boundary has been considered very strong evidence that a large astronomical object (asteroid or comet) devastated our planet some 65 million years ago. Some scientists, however, propose that the ((__iridium__)) layer was instead deposited through widespread volcanic activity. The proponents of an astronomical mechanism should be heartened by a recent paper in Nature, by W.S. Wolbach et al. Here is their Abstract: "Cretaceous-Tertiary (K-T) boundary clays from five sites in Europe and New Zealand are 10 2 -10 4 -fold enriched in elemental C (mainly soot), which is isotopically uniform and apparently comes from a single global fire. The soot layer coincides with the Ir layer, suggesting that the fire was triggered by meteorite impact and began before the ejecta had settled." The composition of the hydrocarbons in the sediments points to the earth's biomass (mainly surface vegetation) as the source of the soot. The total quantity of K-T soot is equivalent to that which would be produced by burning 10% of all present terrestrial plant material. (Wolbach, Wendy S., et al; "Global Fire at the Cretaceous-Tertiary Boundary," Nature, 334:665, 1988.)
_Comment. Unmentioned in the above article is the possibility that extensive wildfires might have been generated by volcanic eruptions, perhaps accompanied by great electrical storms. The 1988 fires in Yellowstone needed no meteoric impact. Reference. Chemical anomalies in the earth's crust are cataloged in ESC1 in Anomalies in Geology. To order this catalog volume, visit: here. Concentration "spikes" of iridium, elemental carbon and soot at the KT boundary, Woodside Creek, New Zealand. (Adapated from Nature, 334:665, 1988). From Science Frontiers #60, NOV-DEC 1988.© 1988-2000 William R. Corliss
[: IRIDIUM, SEDIMENT, FOSSIL]
14. The Rehabilitation Of Cuvier [Science Frontiers Website]
_Science Frontiers ONLINE No. 12: Fall 1980 Issue Contents Other pages Home Page Science Frontiers Online All Issues This Issue Sourcebook Project Sourcebook Subjects The Rehabilitation Of Cuvier
_Cuvier (1769-1832) was a catastrophist. To him, the record of death in the layers of fossiliferous rocks was obviously the consequence of terrestrial convulsions. But Cuvier's ideas were swept aside by the uniformitarians who saw the earth and its cargo of life unfolding with almost agonizing slowness. But Cuvier is making a comeback, as illustrated by the following back-to-back articles in Nature. We quote from the abstracts. "Closely spaced samples from an uninterupted calcareous pelagic sequence across the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary reveal that the extinction of planktonic Foraminifera and nannofossils was abrupt without any previous warning in the sedimentary record, and that the moment of extinction was coupled with anomalous trace element enrichments, especially of ((__iridium__)) and osmium. The rarity of these two elements in the crust of the Earth indicates that an extraterrestrial source, such as the impact of a large meteorite may have provided the required amounts of ((__iridium__)) and osmium." (Smit, J., and Hertogen, J.; "An Extraterrestrial Event at the Cretaceous-Tertiary Boundary," Nature, 285:198, 1980.) "Evidence is presented indicating that the extinction, at the end of the Cretaceous, of large terrestrial animals was caused by atmospheric heating during a cometary impact and that the extinction of calcareous marine plankton was a consequence of poisoning by cyanide released by the fallen comet and of a catastrophic rise in calcitecompensation depth in the oceans after the detoxification of the cyanide." (Hsu, Kenneth J.; "Terrestrial Catastrophe Caused by Cometary Impact at the End of Cretaceous," Nature, 285:201, 1980.) From Science Frontiers #12, Fall 1980.© 1980-2000 William R. Corliss
[: IRIDIUM, SEDIMENT]
15. Did an asteroid impact trigger the ice ages? [Science Frontiers Website]
_Science Frontiers Online All Issues This Issue Sourcebook Project Sourcebook Subjects Did an asteroid impact trigger the ice ages?
_Asteroids and comets are being blamed these days for more and more of our planet's catastrophism - - biological, meteorological, and geological. What a turnabout in scientific thinking in just a decade. F.T. Kyte et al have now provided additional details on meteoritic debris they first described in 1981. On the floor of the southeast Pacific, about 1400 kilometers west of Cape Horn, about 5 kilometers down, they found high concentrations of ((__iridium__)) in Upper Pliocene sediments about 2.3 million years old. Since the proposed projectile hit in very deep water, no crater was dug out. What did survive is called an "impact melt." This is debris rich in noble metals, such as ((__iridium__)), and contains particles typical of a low-metal mesosiderite. Some 600 kilometers of the ocean floor received this debris. Kyte and his associates estimate the size of the impacting object at at least 0.5 kilometers in diameter. No biological extinctions are correlated with the 2.3-million-year date, but there appears to have been a major deterioration of climate at about this time. There was a shift in the marine oxygen isotope records and, more obvious, the creation of the huge loess (sandy) deposits in China. What the impact may have done is to vaporize enough water into the atmosphere to increase the earth's albedo, reflecting sunlight back into space, lowering the average temperature, and thus triggering the Ice Ages. (Kyte, Frant T., et al; "New Evidence on the Size and Possible Effects of a Late Pliocene Oceanic Asteroid Impact," Science, 241:63, 1988.)
_Comment. Aficionados of the Ice Age problems will have to add this theory to the already long list of Ice Age hypotheses. From Science Frontiers #59, SEP-OCT 1988.© 1988-2000 William R. Corliss
[: SHALE, EROSION, FOSSIL, CONFORM]
16. A QUESTIONABLE 200-MILLION-YEAR HIATUS [Science Frontiers Website]
_Science Frontiers ONLINE No. 51: May-Jun 1987 Issue Contents Other pages Home Page Science Frontiers Online All Issues This Issue Sourcebook Project Sourcebook Subjects A QUESTIONABLE 200-MILLION-YEAR HIATUS \
_Hiking down into the Grand Canyon of the Colorado is a geological education. As one descends past the beautifully exposed horizontal strata, one also turns back the geological clock in well-defined ticks. That is what the signs along the way say, and that is what all the textbooks proclaim! But when the juncture between the Redwall Limestone and Muav Limestone is reached, a 200million-year gap appears. The sign posted here by the National Park Service reads: An unconformity "Rocks of the Ordovician and Silurian Periods are missing in Grand Canyon. Temple Butte Limestone of Devonian age occurs in scattered pockets. ____Redwall Limestone rests on these Devonian rocks or on Muav Limestone of much earlier Cambrian Age." This supposed unconformity is puzling for several reasons: ____The two limestone strata "seem" conformable in most places. Both are nicely horizontal, and there is basically no evidence that 200 million years of erosion and tectonic disturbances separate them. ____In some places, the two limestone strata intertongue or interfinger, such that by moving vertically one flashed back and forth in 200-million-year jumps. In both limestone strata, one finds layers of the same micaceous shale containing the same fossil tubeworms, suggesting near-simultaneous deposition. In one place, the two limestones clearly grade into one another, with no separation at all. Anyone who walks down the Canyon trails can see that the evidence for a 200-million-year hiatus between the Mississippian and Cambrian limestones is shaky at best. With the accuracy of geological dating through the use of contained fossils at risk, one would expect many professional papers dealing with this situation. Instead, the geological literature says little. One of the few papers mentioning the "unconformity" states that the contact between the two limestones displays ripples 2 feet from crest to trough, as one might expect with a true unconformity. Such ripples do not seem to exist. (Waisgerber, William, et al; "Mississippian and Cambrian Strata Interbedding: 200 Million Years Hiatus in Question," Creation Research Society Quarterly, 23: 160, 1987.)
_Comment. Aha, this paper was written by scientific creationists, who have an obvious ax to grind. There's surely nothing to it. However, the senior author is a consulting geologist, and the paper is replete with photographs and diagrams. And you can always go see for yourself! It is the interpretation of the data that is in question. Where is the error?
_Reference.
_Puzzles in the stratigraphy of Grand Canyon can be found in ESR1 in our catalog: Inner Earth. For details, visit: here. Stratigraphy of the Redwall-Muav contact, North Kaibab Trail, Grand Canyon. Notice the intertonguing. The mottled limestone and the layers of micaceous shale occur in both the Redwall and Muav limestones, even though they are supposedly separated by 200 million years. (Adapted from the CRSQ article referenced in the text). From Science Frontiers #51, MAY-JUN 1987.© 1987-2000 William R. Corliss
[TIAHUANACO FOOD: CLAY]
17. "HIGH"-TECH FARMING AT TIAHUANACO [Science Frontiers Website]
_Science Frontiers ONLINE No. 50: Mar-Apr 1987 Issue Contents Other pages Home Page Science Frontiers Online All Issues This Issue Sourcebook Project Sourcebook Subjects "HIGH"-TECH FARMING AT TIAHUANACO
_One of Tiahuanaco's (or Tiwanaku's) many puzzles has been how food for such a large city was grown at an altitude of circa 3,850 meters (12,600 feet) in the frosty, windswept Bolivian Andes. This problem along with the fabulous stonework and extensive ruins have precipitated theories involving extraterrestrial visitors and an age for the site in the hundreds of thousands of years. At least the food-supply puzzle now seems to be in hand. Stereoscopic aerial photographs show in startling detail: " ... immense, curvilinear platforms of earth ... these fields form elevated planting surfaces ranging from five to 15 meters wide and up to 200 meters long ... Extensive and nearly continuous tracts of these fields - - all of which have been abandoned for centuries - - run from the edge of Lake Titicaca to about 15 kilometers inland, and form virtually the only topographic relief in the broad, gradually sloping plain." Some of the raised fields are remarkably ____sophisticated in design. At the base is a layer of cobblestones for stability. These are covered by a 10-centimeter layer of clay. On top of the clay are three distinct layers of sorted gravel; all capped by rich organic topsoil. These fields were simultaneously an aquifer for the fresh water percolating down from the surrounding hills and a barrier to the brackish water from Lake Titicaca. Even at Tiahuanaco's altitude, these fields could have grown potatoes, oca, or ulluco and the chenopod grains, as well as quinowa and caniwa. Tiahuanaco and its satellite cities could have been fed with enough left over for export. Not bad for farmers 2,000 years ago! (Kolata, Alan L.; "Tiwanaku and Its Hinterland," Archaeology, 40:36, January/February 1987.) From Science Frontiers #50, MAR-APR 1987.© 1987-2000 William R. Corliss
[DESERT GLASS: IRIDIUM]
18. Flotsam On The Great Sand Sea [Science Frontiers Website]
_Science Frontiers ONLINE No. 126: Nov-Dec 1999 Issue Contents Other pages Home Page Science Frontiers Online All Issues This Issue Sourcebook Project Sourcebook Subjects Flotsam On The Great Sand Sea
_One of the strangest mysteries nestled among the giant dunes of the Egyptian Sahara was not recognized by modern scientists until 1932. In December of that year, P. Clayton, a surveyor for the Egyptian Geological Survey, was driving among the dunes near the Saad Plateau when he heard his tires crunch on something that wasn't sand. It turned out to be large pieces of marvelously clear yellow-green glass - - not just any glass but ultra-pure glass, 98% silica. As often the case, Clayton was not the first to come across the now-famous Libyan Desert Glass or LDG. Prehistoric humans had made knives and other sharp-edged tools from it; the ancient Egyptians had carved a scarab from LDG and deposited it in Tutankhamen's tomb. But Clayton and the ancients did not recognize the scientific implications of their discovery. ____LDG is the purest natural silica glass ever found. Over a thousand tons of it are strewn across hundreds of kilometers of bleak desert. Some of the chunks weigh 26 kilograms, but most LDG exists in smaller, angular pieces looking like shards left when a giant green bottle was smashed by colossal forces. Pure as it is, LDG does contain tiny bubbles, white wisps, and inky black swirls. ____The whitish inclusions consist of refractory minerals, such as cristobalite. ____The ink-like swirls, though, are rich in ((__iridium__)), which is diagnostic of an extraterrestrial impact - - meteorite or comet. The ((__iridium__)) leads to the heart of the LDG problem: Where did this immense amount of widely dispersed glass shards come from? Was it really created during the searing, sand-melting impact of a cosmic projectile? This is how today's catastrophists would have it? At least three "minor" problems bedevil the accepted impact theory. The surface of the Great Sand Sea shows no sign of a giant crater. Neither do microwave probes deep into the sand by satellite radar. LDG seems too pure to be derived from a messy cosmic collision. Known impact craters, such as that at Wabar in Saudi Arabia, are littered with bits of iron and other meteorite debris. Not so at the LDG sites. LDG is concentrated in two areas. One is oval-shaped; the other is a circular ring 6 kilometers wide and 21 kilometers in diameter. The ring's wide center is devoid of LDG. Could there have been a "soft" projectile impact; that is the detonation of a meteorite, perhaps 30 meters in diameter, 10 kilometers or so above the Great Sand Sea? The searing blast of hot air might have melted the sand beneath. Such a craterless impact is thought to have occurred in the 1908 Tunguska Event in Siberia. Another theory has a meteorite glancing off the desert surface leaving a glassy crust and a shallow crater that was soon filled in. But there are two known areas of LDG. Were there two cosmic projectiles in tandem? As of 1999, the origin of the beautiful green LDG remains an enigma. And of course deserts are dynamic places. How much additional LDG lurks beneath all that blowing sand? (Wright, Giles; "The Riddle of the Sands," New Scientist, p. 42, July 10, 1999.)
_Comment. In Tasmania, near Mount Darwin, is strewn the so-called Darwin Glass, which may be a distant relative of the LDG. Darwin Glass, however exists in much smaller pieces and is strewn in a splatter pattern. A potential crater is nearby. For details on these natural glasses, see ESM2 in Neglected Geological Anomalies and SF#64. Libyan Desert Glass (LDG) is strewn over the shaded area. From Science Frontiers #126, NOV-DEC 1999.© 1999-2000 William R. Corliss
[OCEAN IMPACT TSUNAMIS: IRIDIUM]
19. Two Tsumani Tales [Science Frontiers Website]
_Science Frontiers ONLINE No. 85: Jan-Feb 1993 Issue Contents Other pages Home Page Science Frontiers Online All Issues This Issue Sourcebook Project Sourcebook Subjects Two Tsumani Tales
_Only a few years ago astronomical catastrophism was denied as a major factor in geological change. Now one reads everywhere of huge terrestrial impact craters, ((__iridium__)) layers, and tektite deposits. Even so, one necessary consequence of ____70% of the large impacts has been neglected until recently: the giant tsunamis and marine incursions that must have swept over the coasts of the continents following impacts at sea. This oversight is now being rectified.
_100,000 BP. The South Pacific.
_A longstanding geological enigma of the New South Wales coastline is the curious distribution of sand dunes. Those headlands less than 40 meters high have lost most of their dunes, leaving only raw, unweathered rock. On the other hand, the higher headlands have retained these dunes. Australians B. Young and T. Bryant hypothesize that a ____tsunamis 40 meters high swept the lower headlands clean about 100,000 years ago. They can even plot the incoming wave's direction, because a few remnants of the coastal dunes still cling to the southwest corners of the headlands along the NSW coast south of Newcastle. In their scenario, the tsunamis came from the northeast, smashed into the Solomons, southeastern Australia, and northeastern New Zealand. The Great Barrier Reef protected northeastern Australia from the full force of the wave. Young and Bryant favor a Hawaiian landslip as the initiator of the tsunamis, but acknowledge that an asteroid impact could also have done the job. If the wave began near Hawaii, it would initially been about 375 meters (about mile) in height. (Davidson, Garry; "A Tsunamis Tale from Sydney," New Scientist, p. 17, October 17, 1992.) 65,000,000 BP. Northeastern Mexico. The date mentioned is, of course, that of the ____Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary. This is the time when, many scientists believe, a very large asteroid slammed into northern Yucatan, forming the now-buried Chicxulub crater and wiping out the dinosaurs. Since the impact site was covered with ocean at the time, a powerful tsunamis should have surged out from this area. Indeed, debris attributable to a tsunami has been found on the U.S. Gulf Coast and on some Caribbean islands. J. Smit et al now report finding a layer of debris up to 3 meters thick in northeastern Mexico. This layer was apparently ____deposited in water about 400 meters deep as the giant wave wreaked havoc along Mexico's shore and its backwash piled up debris offshore. This interpretation is supported by the presence of tektites, microtektites, glass spherules, abundant plant material, an iridium anomaly, and near the top ripple beds. (Smit, Jan, et al; "Tektite-Bearing, Deep-Water Clastic Unit at the Cretaceous-Tertiary Boundary in Northeastern Mexico," Geology, 20:99, 1992. Reference. Puzzling deposits that may have been created by marine incursions are covered in ETM12 in our catalog: Neglected Geological Anomalies. For details, visit: here. From Science Frontiers #85, JAN-FEB 1993.© 1993-2000 William R. Corliss
[ANTARCTIC IRIDIUM: SEDIMENT]
20. Iridium-rich Layers And Catastrophism [Science Frontiers Website]
_Science Frontiers ONLINE No. 18: Nov-Dec 1981 Issue Contents Other pages Home Page Science Frontiers Online All Issues This Issue Sourcebook Project Sourcebook Subjects Iridium-rich layers and catastrophism
_Kyte et al have discovered a 2.3-million year-old ____sedimentary layer under the Antarctic Ocean that contains ((__iridium__)) and gold concentrations comparable to those in the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary. The noble metals ____are mostly contained in millimeter-sized grains that resemble ablation debris from a large extraterrestrial object. Unlike the Cretaceous-Tertiary episode, however, the newly found layer is not accompanied by evidence of mass biological extinctions. (Kyte, Frank T., et al; "High Noble Metal Concentrations in a Late Pliocene Sediment," Nature, 292:417, 1981.)
_Comment. Perhaps those paleontologists who deny the existence of sudden biological extinctions at the CretaceousTertiary boundary are correct and something else besides catastrophism impacted terrestrial life at that juncture. Reference. The implications of ((__iridium__)) "spikes" are found in Category ESB1 in our Catalog: Anomalies in Geology. To order, go to: here. From Science Frontiers #18, NOV-DEC 1981. © 1981-2000 William R. Corliss
[FLORIDA CRATER: IRIDIUM]
21. Everglades Astrobleme? [Science Frontiers Website]
_Science Frontiers ONLINE No. 43: Jan-Feb 1986 Issue Contents Other pages Home Page Science Frontiers Online All Issues This Issue Sourcebook Project Sourcebook Subjects Everglades astrobleme?
_Astrobleme means "star wound," and the southern tip of Florida seems to have been wounded by an asteroid or some other celestial projectile. At a recent meeting of the Geological Society of America, E.J. Petuch proposed that the Everglades region received a direct hit from an asteroid about 36 million years ago. The Everglades region is a swampy, forested area surrounded by an oval-shaped system of ridges. Geologists usually maintain that the Everglades represent a collapse feature caused by groundwater dissolving away limestone. (Buildings and cars seem to be swallowed fairly regularly by Florida sinkholes.) Petuch disagrees with the collapse theory and points to the following evidence for an ____impact origin: 1. The presence of a strong positive magnetic anomaly; 2. Eocene formations, 40 million years old, are missing over the southern Everglades; 3. A network of fractures pervades rock layers older than Eocene; 4. High ((__iridium__)) concentrations, probably of extraterrestrial origin, exist at the Eocene-Oligocene boundary on nearby Barbados; and 5. The oval reef structure that seems to have grown around the impact area as sealevels rose. Some geologists do not concur with the asteroid theory, but they are all reviewing Florida's geological history in a new light. (Weisburd, S.; "Asteroid Origin of the Everglades?" Science News, 128:294, 1985.) Reference. Very large craters and astroblemes are cataloged in ETC in out catalog: Carolina Bays, Mima Mounds, which is described here. Time, of December 9, 1985, has a nice map of the asteroid's "footprint", but copyright laws prevent us from using it; so we've made our own. The black circle is the collapsed basin surrounding the impact point. The elliptical coral reef is tangent to the southern rim of the collapse basin and runs northwest through the tomatoes, loops around Lake Okeechobee between the peas and lima beans. From Science Frontiers #43, JAN-FEB 1986.© 1986-2000 William R. Corliss
[: IRIDIUM]
22. Of Dust Clouds And Ice Ages [Science Frontiers Website]
_Sourcebook Project Sourcebook Subjects Of Dust Clouds And Ice Ages
_Ice cores from the polar ice at Camp Century, in Greenland, have been analyzed for the presence of cosmic dust. "It is concluded that ____on five occasions during the interval 20,000-14,000 years BP, cosmic dust mass concentrations in the solar system rose by one and two orders of magnitude above present day levels. Moreover if the particles found in these ice core samples are indicative of the particle size distribution which prevailed in the interplanetary medium at that time, then it may be concluded that the space number ____density of submicron sized particles must have increased by a factor of 10^5 or more. During these times the light transmission properties of the solar system would have been significantly altered resulting in major adverse effects to the earth's climate. Thus it is quite possible that these dust congestion episodes were responsible for the abrupt climatic variations which occurred toward the end of the last Ice Age." Whence these interplanetary dust clouds? The author of this article ruled out terrestrial volcanism (an insufficient source of ((__iridium__))) and encounters with asteroids and cometary tails (too infrequent to account for the long periods of high dust levels). Rather, the dust source may have been ____the same event that created the recently discovered dust ring between Mars and Jupiter, which is believed to be only a few tens of thousands of years old. The nature of the "event" is not specified. (LaViolette, Paul A.; "Evidence of High Cosmic Dust Concentrations in Late Pleistocene Polar Ice (20,000-14,000 Years BP)," Meteoritics, 20:545, 1985.) References. See our catalog volume The Sun and Solar System Debris for more on the flotsam and jetsam of outer space. This book is described here. Also see the following item on "icy meteors" which is also pertinent. From Science Frontiers #44, MAR-APR 1986.© 1986-2000 William R. Corliss
[: IRIDIUM, SEDIMENT]
23. Do large meteors/comets come in cycles? [Science Frontiers Website]
_Science Frontiers ONLINE No. 52: Jul-Aug 1987 Issue Contents Other pages Home Page Science Frontiers Online All Issues This Issue Sourcebook Project Sourcebook Subjects Do large meteors/comets come in cycles?
_Only a few years ago, geologists refused to recognize any terrestrial meteor craters larger than Arizona's Meteor Crater, which is merely a mile or so in diameter. Now, we have a long list of craters or astroblemes (star wounds), some of which measure hundreds of miles across. In fact, there are enough large dated crters so that some scientists have taken up a time-honored human pastime: Looking for cycles or periodicities in the data. (Humans can find cyclicities in almost any collection of data!) To be more specific, some have claimed that large meteor craters come in clusters dated 28-31 million years apart. These catastrophic events have been correlated with biological extinctions, magnetic field reversals, and basalt flooding. The astronomical causes of this supposed periodicity range from the solar-system's crossing of the galactic plane, to the perturbations of an unseen solar companion, to regular perturbations of the Oort cloud of comets that is thought to hover at the fringe of the solar system. In short, a large, interlocking edifice of geological and astronomical speculation has been erected upon a foundation of terrestrial crater ages. ____But how well do we really know the ages of these craters? How complete is the cratering record? The answer to the first question is: "Not well at all." Further, we can be certain that many craters still lie undiscovered beneath sediments. In addition, most meteors/comets splashed into the oceans, leaving no record at all. An updating of the most recent crater data available, such as they are, greatly weakens the case for the popular 28-31 million-year period and strengthens support for a 19-22 million-year period. But neither cycle is in synchronism with the famous K-T (Cretaceous-Tertiary) Boundary, with its perplexing ((__iridium__)) layer and massive biological extinctions. In fact, say V.L. Sharpton et al, ____the entire known cratering record could well be the consequence of chance encounters between the earth and stray meteors and comets. Thus would pass the periodicities of this world! (Sharpton, V.L. et al; "Periodicity in the Earth's Cratering Record?" Eos, 68: 344, 1987.) Reference. More details on crater periodicity may be found in ETC4 in our catalog: Carolina Bays, Mima Mounds. For information on this book, see: here. From Science Frontiers #52, JUL-AUG 1987.© 1987-2000 William R. Corliss
[FLOOD BASALTS, DECCAN TRAPS: IRIDIUM, SEDIMENT]
24. Terrestrial Maria? [Science Frontiers Website]
_Science Frontiers ONLINE No. 61: Jan-Feb 1989 Issue Contents Other pages Home Page Science Frontiers Online All Issues This Issue Sourcebook Project Sourcebook Subjects Terrestrial maria?
_Those dark patches that constitute the face of the man-in-the-moon are really huge outpourings of lava. Once considered real seas, they are called "maria." Maria like those on the moon also exist on the earth. This is a surprise because terrestrial maria were never mentioned in my college geology courses. But, in those days, the one-mile-wide Meteor Crater, in Arizona, was the largest accepted consequence of celestial bombardment. Deccan basalt flows (also called the Deccan traps) in Western India, shown before the formation of the Carlsberg Ridge and the splitting off of the the Seychelles. D. Alt and colleagues, at the University of Montana, have identified ____four large basalt plateaus that might be terrestrial maria: "Notable examples of large lava plateaus that resemble lunar maria include, among others, the Deccan Plateau of India, the Columbia Plateau of western North America, the Parana Plateau of South America, and the Tungusska Basin of Siberia. All consist mostly of basalt lava flows; those on continents include minor quantities of rhyolite, and variable amounts of sediment.. All seem to have appeared suddenly, within plates. No consistent context of plate interactions explains them. We suggest that ____large lava plateaus are indeed terrestrial maria." Alt et al go on to show that ____these lava plateaus seem to have initiated [R1]____continental rifts and hotspot tracks where none existed before. A reasonable inference is that ____these plateaus are the consequence of the impacts of large meteorites. This is particularly the case with the Deccan Plateau, which is age-dated as synchronous with the Cretaceous-Tertiary Boundary event, with its legacy of worldwide ((__iridium__)) deposits and the wholesale extinction of life. The paper concludes with: "It therefore appears that random encounters with ____vagrant asteroidal objects play an important role in setting the course of plate tectonic events. The earth does not control its own agenda." (Alt, D., et al; "Terrestrial Maria: The Origins of Large Basalt Plateaus, Hotspot Tracks and Spreading Ridges," Journal of Geology, 96:647, 1988.) From Science Frontiers #61, JAN-FEB 1989.© 1989-2000 William R.
[K/T IMPACTOR: IRIDIUM, SEDIMENT: CLAY]
25. Looking For The Smoking Gun [Science Frontiers Website]
_Science Frontiers ONLINE No. 75: May-Jun 1991 Issue Contents Other pages Home Page Science Frontiers Online All Issues This Issue Sourcebook Project Sourcebook Subjects Looking For The Smoking Gun
_We already know the victims (the dinosaurs and other fauna and flora), and there is considerable evidence that the bullet was a cosmic projectile of some sort. The absence of a smoking gun (a sufficiently large terrestrial crater with an age of 65 million years) has allowed volcanists to deny the cosmic catastrophists a complete victory. However, the recent identification of ____tektite-like glasses at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary (KTB) on Haiti is leading geological detectives closer and closer to the missing crater. Elsewhere in the world, ____the KTB is characterized by an ((__iridium__)) anomaly and a thin layer of "impact clay" consisting of tiny bits of shocked minerals. ____At Beloc, on Haiti, though, geologists find a 55-centimeter-thick layer of glassy debris. ____Approximately 25% of this stratum consists of 1-6-millimeter particles of tektite-like glass. Most of the glass particles are spherical, but a few have the splash-forms and dumbbell shapes of bona fide tektites. The thickness of the Haitian deposit and the large sizes of the particles suggest that the smoking gun must be nearby. Ironically, the Haiti stratum was originally classified as of volcanic origin; and we must add that we are presenting here only the conclusions of the asteroid school. But where oh where is this crater? The Manson crater in Iowa (now buried) is of the right age but too small. The best candidate so far is buried in northern Yucatan. The Chicxulub crater is discernible on gravity - and magnetic anomaly maps and is probably of the right age. Only drilling will confirm the guilt of the suspect. Even if Chicxulub is the culprit, much debate prevails over exactly how the dinosaurs were done in. Was it a "cosmic winter" due to dust intercepting sunlight? Or perhaps a "cosmic summer" resulting from a super-greenhouse effect caused by: (1) impact-released methane trapped in sediments, and (2) the CO 2 from zapped carbonate rocks. (Smit, Jan; "Where Did It Happen?" Nature, 349:461, 1991, and Sigurdsson, Haraldur, et al; "Glass from the Cretaceous/Tertiary Boundary in Haiti," Nature, 349:482, 1991.) Reference. Section ETC in catalog Carolina Bays, Mima Mounds is devoted entirely to impact craters. Ordering data here. From Science Frontiers #75, MAY-JUN 1991.© 1991-2000 William R. Corliss
[ANTARCTIC K/T BONE BED: IRIDIUM, FOSSIL]
26. An Antarctic Bone Bed [Science Frontiers Website]
_Science Frontiers ONLINE No. 104: Mar-Apr 1996 Issue Contents Other pages Home Page Science Frontiers Online All Issues This Issue Sourcebook Project Sourcebook Subjects An Antarctic Bone Bed
_W. Zinsmeister was accustomed to scoff at the idea that the Age of Dinosaurs ended violently with the impact of a giant asteroid some 65 million years ago. He always asked: "Where's the layer of burnt and twisted dinosaur bones?" His certainty was shaken, however, when he began mapping ____fossil deposits on Seymour Island, Antarctica. He didn't find the dinosaur bones but rather a giant bed of fish bones at least 50 square kilometers in area. Some sort of catastrophe must have annihilated untold millions of fish. And guess what? ____This great bone bed was deposited directly on top of that layer of extraterrestrial ((__iridium__)) that marks the 65-million-year-old Cretaceous Tertiary boundary at many sites around the world. (Hecht, Jeff; "The Island Where the Fish Had Their Chips," New Scientist, p. 16, November 11, 1995) Cross reference. Bone beds of fish and other creatures are filed under ESB13X2 in Anomalies in Geology. To order this catalog, see here. From Science Frontiers #104, MAR-APR 1996.© 1996-2000 William R. Corliss
[ARKANSAS K/T TSUNAMI ERRATICS: IRIDIUM]
27. An Arkansas Tsunami Deposit? [Science Frontiers Website]
_Home Page Science Frontiers Online All Issues This Issue Sourcebook Project Sourcebook Subjects An Arkansas Tsunami Deposit?
_Yes, Arkansas is hundreds of kilometers from any ocean. Could a tsunami ever reach Little Rock, or even 120 kilometers northeast of Little Rock where, ____atop a 76-meter (250-foot) hill are perched giant blocks of sandstone. These blocks range up to 7.6 meters (25 feet) in size and weigh many tons. No native rocks in the area match them. The Ice Age glaciers never reached Arkansas, so they can't be glacial erratics. Where did they come from? ____One clue is the presence of glauconite in the sandstone. Glauconite is common in marine rocks, so suspicion points toward the Gulf of Mexico. Geologist G. Patterson, University of Memphis, thinks that ____the huge chunks of sandstone came from coastal Louisiana and were carried some 650 kilometers (400 miles) inland by the giant tsunami raised by the asteroid or comet that smashed into the Yucatan to close out the Cretaceous. That, of course, was when the dinosaurs were forced into oblivion. But could ____the tsunami really have transported such huge rocks 650 kilometers? (Falk, Dan; "Washed Up," New Scientist, p. 26, November 7, 1998.)
_Comments. Tsunami debris from the end-Cretaceous impact has been found along the Gulf Coast and on some Caribbean islands. ____In northeastern Mexico, geologists have found a debris layer 3-meters thick that is also of the right age. This layer contains tektites, glass spheres, plant material, and an ((__iridium__)) anomaly. (SF#85) However, these debris deposits can hardly compare to the far-inland Arkansas sandstone chunks. From Science Frontiers #121, JAN-FEB 1999.© 1999-2000 William R. Corliss
[EARTH MAGNETIC FIELD: CLAY]
28. The changing magnetic climate: does it affect civilizations? [Science Frontiers Website]
_Science Frontiers ONLINE No. 54: Nov-Dec 1987 Issue Contents Other pages Home Page Science Frontiers Online All Issues This Issue Sourcebook Project Sourcebook Subjects The changing magnetic climate: does it affect civilizations?
_Abstract. "Past values for the geomagnetic intensity may be obtained by laboratory analysis of the thermoremanent magnetization carried by clay baked in ancient times. From global averages of such determinations it is commonly accepted that the intensity in any given region went through ____a broad maximum about 2000 years ago, reaching a level about 50% higher than at present. Here we present results obtained from a wide range of Chinese pottery, spanning the interval from 4000 BC to the present, indicating that ____the field behaviour was more complex. ____The intensity was high between 1500 and 1000 BC and again in the first half of the first millennium AD. Comparison with results reported for Western Asia, Egypt and Crete suggests that ____these high values are due to non-dipole disturbances in the geomagnetic field, consistent with long-term records of the cosmogenic radioisotopes 14 C and 10 Be." (Quing-Yun, Wei, et al; "Geomagnetic Intensity as Evaluated from Ancient Chinese Pottery," Nature, 328:330, 1987.)
_Comment. This article stimulates three questions: What caused the geomagnetic changes; could some be of internal origin? Are periods of reduced magnetic fields associated with cultural changes? The graph, for example, reveals a dip during the flowering of Greek civilization. Could such ambient magnetic changes have an effect on human imagination, as reported in laboratory test?. See SF#53. Ratios of ancient geomagnetic field intensity to present intensity versus date. Data from China. From Science Frontiers #54, NOV-DEC 1987.© 1987-2000 William R. Corliss
[ENGLAND COLD MUD SPRING FOSSILS: CLAY]
29. Mud Springs Regurgitate Ancient Fossils [Science Frontiers Website]
_Science Frontiers ONLINE No. 106: Jul-Aug 1996 Issue Contents Other pages Home Page Science Frontiers Online All Issues This Issue Sourcebook Project Sourcebook Subjects Mud Springs Regurgitate Ancient Fossils
_Mud springs in Wiltshire, England, may be the only ones of their kind on the planet. The Wiltshire mud springs are cold. They are not hot and steaming like those seen where geothermal heat is close to the surface, as in New Zealand, Java, and Yellowstone. They are also unique in their ____entrainment of subterranean fossils and bringing them to the surface. "There is no explanation of the way the springs ooze a pale, cold, grey mud to the surface, forming blisters that spurt high into the air. "Neville Hollingworth of the Natural Environment Research Council said: 'They are like a fossil conveyor belt bringing up finds from the clay layers below and then washing them out in a nearby stream.'" The fossil conveyor belt yields bones of marine reptiles, oyster shells, and the remains of sea creatures that lived during the Jurassic, about 165 million years ago. ____Some of the bivalves still retain their organic ligaments. Geologists wonder what forces squeeze the mud to the surface like toothpaste from a tube. (Nuttall, Nick; "Mud Springs a Surprise after 165 Million Years," London Times, May 2, 1996. Cr. A.C.A. Silk) From Science Frontiers #106, JUL-AUG 1996.© 1996-2000 William R. Corliss
[CANADA SOFT-BODIED FOSSILS: SHALE]
30. The Burgess Shale Puzzle [Science Frontiers Website]
_Science Frontiers ONLINE No. 18: Nov-Dec 1981 Issue Contents Other pages Home Page Science Frontiers Online All Issues This Issue Sourcebook Project Sourcebook Subjects The Burgess Shale Puzzle
_In British Columbia, a middle Cambrian (550 million years BP) formation called the Burgess Shale has miraculously ____preserved a vast assemblage of soft-bodied sea creatures, especially arthropods. Does this rich and unusual deposit help elucidate arthropod evolution? No, it has complicated the problem. Few of the fossil arthropods can be easily related to groups now living. The Burgess Shale arthropod population is primitive in some ways but remarkably specialized in others. Some of the fossils have body segments like those in one recognized arthropod group but display limbs resembling those of an entirely different group. (Fortey, R.A.; "The Burgess Shale: A Unique Cambrian Fauna," Nature, 293: 189, 1981.)
_Comment. It appears that Nature was shuffling the gene deck, or that there was rampant hybridization, or that confusing programs for evolutionary change were drifting in from the cosmos a la Hoyle and Wickramasinghe! From Science Frontiers #18, NOV-DEC 1981.© 1981-2000 William R. Corliss
[ANTARCTIC FOSSIL FOREST: SHALE]
31. A Permian Polar Forest [Science Frontiers Website]
_Science Frontiers ONLINE No. 84: Nov-Dec 1992 Issue Contents Other pages Home Page Science Frontiers Online All Issues This Issue Sourcebook Project Sourcebook Subjects A Permian Polar Forest
_ ____"An in situ Upper Permian fossil forest in the central Transantarctic Mountains near the Beardmore Glacier includes 15 permineralized trunks in growth position; the paleolatitude of the site was approximately 80 to 85 south. Numerous leaves of the seed fern Glossopteris are present in the shale in which the trunks are rooted. The trunks are perminealized and tree rings reveal that the forest was a rapidly growing and young forest, persisting in an equable, strongly seasonal climate - - a scenario that ____does not fit with some climate reconstructions for this time period." Some models of the Permian climate, based on astronomical and meteorological parameters, have winter temperatures at the site averaging -30 to -40 C, with the average summer temperature at merely 0 C. This fossil forest is clearly at odds with these models. (Taylor, Edith L., et al; "The Present Is Not the Key to the Past: A Polar Forest from the Permian of Antarctica," Science, 257:1675, 1992.) From Science Frontiers #84, NOV-DEC 1992.© 1992-2000 William R. Corliss
[ANTARCTIC FISH FOSSIL BED: IRIDIUM]
32. An Antarctic Bone Bed [Science Frontiers Website]
_Science Frontiers ONLINE No. 104: Mar-Apr 1996 Issue Contents Other pages Home Page Science Frontiers Online All Issues This Issue Sourcebook Project Sourcebook Subjects An Antarctic Bone Bed
_W. Zinsmeister was accustomed to scoff at the idea that the Age of Dinosaurs ended violently with the impact of a giant asteroid some 65 million years ago. He always asked: "Where's the layer of burnt and twisted dinosaur bones?" His certainty was shaken, however, when he began mapping fossil deposits on Seymour Island, Antarctica. He didn't find the dinosaur bones but rather a giant bed of fish bones at least 50 square kilometers in area. Some sort of catastrophe must have annihilated untold millions of fish. And guess what? This great bone bed was deposited directly on top of that layer of extraterrestrial ((__iridium__)) that marks the 65-million-year-old Cretaceous Tertiary boundary at many sites around the world. (Hecht, Jeff; "The Island Where the Fish Had Their Chips," New Scientist, p. 16, November 11, 1995) Cross reference. Bone beds of fish and other
[S. AFRICA VERTEBRATE FOSSIL BED: SHALE]
33. The Karoo: The Greatest Vertebrate Graveyard [Science Frontiers Website]
_Science Frontiers ONLINE No. 105: May-Jun 1996 Issue Contents Other pages Home Page Science Frontiers Online All Issues This Issue Sourcebook Project Sourcebook Subjects The karoo: the greatest vertebrate graveyard
_In SF#104, we mentioned a vast bone bed consisting mainly of fish remains. Now, an exchange of letters in a creationist journal gives us the opportunity to present a few facts about ____a giant bone bed of terrestrial vertebrate fossils: the Karoo Supergroup of southern Africa. The point being discussed by the creationists is the source of the estimated 800 billion vertebrate fossils contained in the Karoo deposits. Whence this astronomical number of mainly swampdwelling reptiles? And whence the immense volume of sandstones and shale that contains their bones? The Genesis Flood model favored by creationists requires that all 800 billion animals be drowned at the same time and swept into South Africa and fossilized. But, they ask themselves, could the entire earth ever have supported so many swamploving reptiles at the same time? Is the Flood model threatened? (Froede, Carl R., Jr.; "The Karoo and Other Fossil Graveyards: A Further Reply to Mr. Yake," Creation Research Society Quarterly, 32:199, 1996. A response by Bill Yake followed this letter.)
_Comment. The figure of 800 billion fossils appears in several authoritative works, although concern is expressed about its magnitude and assumptions employed in calculating it. One thing that is certain is that the Karoo deposits are immense and packed with bones. Even after decades of fossil collecting, bones are still sticking out of the ground. ____Composed mainly of sandstones and shales deposited in shallow water, the Karoo can be 20,000 feet thick. ____The fossil-rich beds stretch out for hundreds of miles. Nowhere else on the planet is there such a massive, continuous, fossiliferous land deposit. The creationists' questions are not out of order at all. See Chapter ESD in Neglected Geological Anomalies for more on this. This volume is described here. From Science Frontiers #105, MAY-JUN 1996.© 1996-2000 William R. Corliss
[FLORIDA RICH FOSSIL BED]
34. Bone Bed Discovered In Florida [Science Frontiers Website]
_Science Frontiers ONLINE No. 39: May-Jun 1985 Issue Contents Other pages Home Page Science Frontiers Online All Issues This Issue Sourcebook Project Sourcebook Subjects Bone Bed Discovered
_In Florida A new bond bed has been discovered south of Tampa. Paleontologists say it it is ____one of the richest fossil deposits ever found in the United States. It has yielded the bones of more than 70 species of animals, birds, and aquatic creatures. About 80% of the bones belong to plains animals, such as camels, horses, mammoths, etc. Bears, wolves, large cats, and a bird with an estimated 30-foot wingspan are also represented. Mixed in with all the land animals are sharks' teeth, turtle shells, and the bones of fresh and salt water fish. ____The bones are all smashed and jumbled together, as if by some catastrophe. The big question is how bones from such different ecological nitches - - plains, forests, ocean - - came together in the same place. (Armstrong, Carol; "Florida Fossils Puzzle the Experts," Creation Research Society Quarterly, 21:198, 1985.) From Science Frontiers #39, MAY-JUN 1985.© 1985-2000 William R. Corliss
[CALIFORNIA POLYSTRATE WHALE FOSSIL]
35. The Whale-on-its-tail Fossil [Science Frontiers Website]
_Science Frontiers ONLINE No. 104: Mar-Apr 1996 Issue Contents Other pages Home Page Science Frontiers Online All Issues This Issue Sourcebook Project Sourcebook Subjects
_The whale-on-its-tail fossil Near Lompoc, California, is ____a large deposit of diatomaceous earth, so-called because it is composed almost entirely of countless billions of exquisitely sculptured diatom skeletons. Uniformitarian geologists have steadfastly maintained that such diatomaceous-earth deposits require millions of years to form as the tiny skeletons sink slowly to the sea floor. At Lompoc, however, embedded in the thick layer of diatomaceous earth is the fossil of a large whale apparently standing on its tail. How could this whale fossil have maintained its position and integrity over hundreds of thousands of years as it was buried millimeter by millimeter? Wouldn't the bones have been quickly scattered? Creationists have pointed to this whale as proof that the Lompoc diatomaceous-earth deposit was formed catastrophically, interring the whale almost instantaneously, and burying doctrinaire uniformitarianism at the same time. (Creationists want to "shorten" geological time to fit Biblical schedules.) But was the whale really entombed on its tail? Creationist geologists studied the Lompoc deposit and put a different slant on the story but not on its ending. "Contrary to some reports that have circulated, ____the 80-90 ft (24-27 m) long fossilised baleen whale found in April 1976 in an inclined position in a diatomite unit in the Miguelito Mine at Lompoc, California, was not buried while 'standing on its tail'. An onsite investigation has revealed that ____the diatomite unit which entombed the whale is also inclined at the same angle, the whale having been buried in the diatomite unit while both were in the horizontal position, and ____subsequent earth movements having tilted both. Nevertheless, this whale fossil still bears testimony to its catastrophic burial, and thus the catastrophic deposition of the enclosing diatomite. "The current uniformitarian (slow and gradual) model for diatomite deposition, as seen in the Guaymas Basin of the Gulf of California, is not capable of explaining the purity of the Lompoc diatomite ... the deposition rate is too slow to avoid corrosion and scavenging of the bones, both of which are absent from the Lompoc whale bones." (Snelling, Andrew A.; "The Whale Fossil in Diatomite, Lompoc, California," CEN Technical Journal, 9:244, 1995. This is an Australian creationist journal.)
_Comment. The Lompoc whale fossil does suggest very rapid deposition, but it does not prove that 4.5 billion years of geological history can be compressed into the requisite 6,000 years! Reference. The Lompoc deposit and many others like it are cataloged in ESD2 in the catalog volume: Neglected Geological Anomalies. For details on this book, visit: here. The Lompoc diatomite bed (left) and fossile whale, as found excavated in 1976. From Science Frontiers #104, MAR-APR 1996.© 1996-2000 William R. Corliss
[NO CAMBRIAN EXPLOSION: FOSSIL]
36. Biology Heavy [Science Frontiers Website]
_Science Frontiers ONLINE No. 109: Jan-Feb 1997 Issue Contents Other pages Home Page Science Frontiers Online All Issues This Issue Sourcebook Project Sourcebook Subjects Biology Heavy
_Paleontology vs. DNA. The so-called Cambrian Explosion has been the subject of two SF items (SF#60/187 and SF#85/ 187). A paleontological fact of life is that all known body plans (phyla) seem to have evolved suddenly - - within a few million years - - after the onset of the Cambrian period some 545 million years ago. Evolutionists are understandably uncomfortable with such a high rate of evolutionary innovation. Nothing like the Cambrian Explosion appears in the hundreds of millions of years of geological strata that followed. So rapid was speciation during the Cambrian Explosion that doubt is cast upon the accepted mechanisms of evolution: slow, stepwise accumulation of mutations plus natural selection. (Refs. 1 and 2) But G.A. Wray and colleagues seem to have rescued Darwinism. They have analyzed the DNA sequences of seven genes found in living animals. Assuming that these genes mutate at constant rates and working backwards in time, they calculate that animal diversification (i.e., when chordates diverged from invertebrates) actually began about 1 billion years ago, rather than about 545 million years ago. This expansion of the time frame gives accepted evolutionary processes much more time to innovate and create all those new body plans. The evolutionists are pleased. The paleontologists, however, are in a quandry. They see nothing - - or very little - - in the Precambrian fossil record that substantiates the claim of Wray at al. Thus, molecular biology directly contradicts the findings of paleontology. Not to worry say supporters of the new and much more comfortable scenario: The Precambrian animals were so soft and "squishy" that they did not fossilize well. (Ref. 3)
_Comment. The molecular biologists are a bit arrogant in their assertions. They seem to assume that because they can quantify molecular divergences; that is, fill their journal contributions with numbers; that their data is more sound than fossiliferous strata. But their crucial assumption of constant DNA divergence in time may be their undoing. References Ref. 1. Anonymous; "Deflating the Biological Big Bang," Science News, 150: 335, 1996. Ref. 2. Perlman, David; "Origin of Animals - - 1.2 Billion Years Ago," San Francisco Chronicle, October 25, 1996. Cr. J. Covey. Ref. 3. Wray, Gregory A., et al; "Molecular Evidence for Deep Precambrian Divergences among Metazoan Phyla," Science, 274:568, 1996. Homology vs. DNA. Until the molecular biologists recently arrived on the scene, evolutionary family trees were based upon similarities in appearance; that is, homology. Animals that look alike must be closely related. But molecular biologists have discovered that some animals that seem identical to the eye differ significantly in their DNA complements. Thus, the Pacific skinks may undermine homology. Inhabiting many, far-separated Pacific islands, these small lizards all look pretty much alike externally. For many years, biologists assumed that they all belonged to the same species. Recently, scalpels in hand, they found that the skink innards differed enough to define two species: Emioa cyanura and Emioa impar. Next, the molecular biologists got into the act. They discovered that the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) of the Guam and Kosrae skinks differed by an amazing 6%, even though both skinks were E. cyanura. Even worse, the Vanuatu skink( E. impar) differed from all other E. impar skinks around the Pacific by an astounding 13%. Yet, to the eye, they all looked alike. So much for homology - - unless there is something basically wrong with molecular biology. Biologists now suspect that there are many more "cryptic species": animals that look alike but possess substantially different DNA complements. (Cohen, Philip; "Lizards Keep Their Differences to Themselves," New Scientist, p. 17, July 6, 1996)
_Comment. The flip side can be seen in humans and chimpanzees. From the standpoints of anatomy and behavior, these species are rather divergent; but their DNAs differ by only 2%! There is something suspicious in all this. Three of the hundred or so basic body plans (phyla): jellyfish (Coelenterata), aphid (Arthopoda), eohippus (Chordata). The present fossil record indicates that all phyla appeared rather suddenly in early Cambrian times. From Science Frontiers #109, JAN-FEB 1997.© 1997-2000 William R. Corliss
[ROCK ART DINOSAURS: CLAY]
37. The Continuing Ica Mystery [SIS C&C Review]
_From: SIS Review Vol VI No 4 (1984) Home¦ Issue Contents FOCUS ARCHAEOLOGICAL ANOMALIES The Continuing Ica Mystery
_Contrary to prevailing opinion, the mystery of the curious engraved stones from Ica in Peru still remains unsolved. The Ica stones, an estimated 50,000 of which are now in the hands of private collectors, have been the subject of heated controversy since 1961 when the local villagers began to turn up stones with a distinctive, almost bizarre, style of carving. Some collectors took interest, buying them for very small amounts of money - and then two archaeologists, who, suspecting the authenticity of the stones, began exploratory excavations in nearby tombs. They did in fact discover a few examples of similar engraved stones in sealed archaeological deposits, enhancing the possibility that the collected stones were also genuine. Their authenticity has also been vigorously defended by a number of Peruvian savants over the last two decades. Despite this, and the growing attention of writers and researchers around the world, the Peruvian archaeological establishment has steadfastly refused to take any interest in the matter. The basic reason would seem to be sheer embarrassment, a reluctance on the part of the authorities to become involved in such a highly controversial issue. For the engravings on the stones, if they are genuinely ancient, would reveal evidence about our ancestors which totally contradicts all received wisdom on the history of man and the progress of biological evolution. One of the many Ica stones with a comet scene exhibiting an almost obsessional interest in astronomy. The person appears to be using a telescope. (Photograph by Peter Afford) Pictures on some of the stones, usually those best and most intricately carved, contain apparently fantastic information: curiously depicted men are shown using what appear to be scientific instruments, such as telescopes; other scenes, which at first glance might seem to be bloody sacrificial rites, appear on closer examination to be highly sophisticated operations on human organs including the heart and brain; and most surprising of all, some stones show human beings in the company of unmistakable dinosaurs, including recognisable specimens of brontosaurus, triceratops and stegosaurus. Of particular interest to catastrophists are the large number of stones which display an almost obsessional interest in the heavens, depicting constellations, stars and planets. Many feature enormous comets (one of which appears to be hurtling earthwards) and celestial dragon-like monsters, being keenly observed by the Ica astronomers. It is easy to succumb to the temptation, as most archaeologists have done, of rejecting the whole business as a ludicrous hoax. This may be the easiest course of action, especially if one chooses not to become acquainted with the real facts about the stones and their discovery; but a different conclusion might be reached after a fair and open-minded assessment of the details. One should bear in mind the famous case of the Glozel tablets from France, rejected as forgeries for decades by the archaeological establishment. Their authenticity now seems to be supported by numerous thermoluminescence tests (see SISR II:3, p. 96 for references) and the opinion of several epigraphists who maintain that they are genuine pre-Roman Gallic relics. And with regard to the Ica engravings, one should not allow the "likeliness" of the scenes to influence a scientific decision as to which stones are genuine or not, as some have done. The watchword for such "anomalous" finds should be that careful and intelligent research, rather than scoffing, is the only way to arrive at a satisfactory answer. This is the position of two members of the S.I.S., Peter Afford and Sophie Milewska, by training a lawyer and a geologist respectively, who have been studying the Ica mystery for some nine years. The results of their research, the subject of a book in preparation by Peter Afford, show that there is no simple answer to the problem of the Ica stones. For every argument that the stones are modern forgeries there is strong evidence to the contrary; consequently there is the greatest need for an honest and fresh approach to the problem, of the kind being pursued by Afford and Milewska. For British members of the Society, who may have seen the BBC television Horizon programme debunking the work of Swiss adventurer Erich von Däniken, the very mention of the Ica stones may bring a bad taste to the mouth. In November 1977 one of the Horizon documentaries investigated "The case of the Ancient Astronauts", featuring a report on the Ica stones as a major example of von Däniken's mishandling of the evidence. Von Däniken had, in his popular books, included the Ica stones as evidence of a surprisingly high technology in the ancient world, and therefore (in his terms) as proof of extraterrestrial intelligences having intervened in human history. The Horizon team interviewed one Basilio, who sells carved stones and has claimed, along with another local resident called Irma, to have forged all the Ica stones. They filmed Basilio manufacturing a specimen and were pleased to announce that once again von Däniken had been shown to have based his theories on dubious or fraudulent evidence. They supported this view with a geologist's report comparing two stones, one held to be genuine, the other ostensibly a forgery picked up on the market. Laboratory analysis showed the stones to be essentially similar, for instance with regard to the level of oxidation present within the incisions of the engravings on both the "original" and "faked" stones. The Horizon team's research must seem convincing to many, including as it does a scientific analysis performed at the Institute of Geological Sciences, London, as well as the testimony of a self-confessed forger. A cut and dried case? Not so, according to Afford and Milewska, who feel that the most obvious answer, as in so many classic detective cases, may not always be the correct one. Unlike many journalists and scientists who have commented on the problem, they have had access to the largest collection of the stones, 12,000 of which are crammed into the carefully guarded museum of the somewhat eccentric surgeon Dr Javier Cabrera. Cabrera, with a single-mindedness and dedication worthy of Velikovsky himself, has taken on the task of collecting and protecting the Ica stones that has been shrugged off by the Peruvian Antiquities Department. Despite having been appointed by the government as head of the Ica "Casa de Cultura", a body responsible for fostering local arts and sciences, Cabrera has been endlessly frustrated in his attempts to secure official support in his campaign for protection and scientific study of the stones. He has become an understandably defensive individual, isolated from the mainstream of the scientific community and the proponent of some highly unorthodox theories about the stones. Afford and Milewska have nevertheless gained his confidence, and have had the opportunity to study the best of the Ica stones at first hand and arrive at their own conclusions. On the whole they feel that the collection is extremely ancient, certainly several thousand years old, and they base their conclusions on a number of considerations. First, the idea that a local forger, even with a few accomplices, could develop such a distinctive and totally "new" art style, and then manufacture in excess of fifty thousand examples, defies any calculations in terms of man hours, as Afford sees it. Second, the stones are not all hand-held pebbles as one may imagine from the most popular accounts; the Cabrera collection includes numerous boulder-sized examples, several feet high, covered with the most intricate and sophisticated designs. Third, one should not forget the undoubtedly genuine examples of similar stones excavated by archaeologists from nearby pre-Columbian tombs, or the reported discoveries of engraved stones from long before the excitement began in 1961. All things considered, a careful assessment of the circumstantial evidence makes it highly implausible that all the stones are forgeries - unless we are witnessing the results of a hoax of monumental proportions, for which no sensible motive can be deduced. But what of the Horizon exposé? The BBC's research, feels Afford, was even more skimpy than that of the infamous von Däniken. With respect to Basilio's "confession", it is hard to understand why the word of a self-confessed rogue was taken as cast-iron truth. For one thing Basilio keeps changing his story; in 1974, even when offered a large sum of money to do so, he insisted that he could not carve a stone himself and that he merely dug them up from nearby deposits. And some time after the Horizon programme (in which he manufactured a very crude and small engraving within an hour) he confided to Sophie Milewska, under no duress and with nothing to gain from his story, that he did indeed only collect the stones from the hills. Why then did he claim in 1977 that he also carved them? The vital ingredient in the tale, as Peter Afford stresses, is that the excavation and sale of antiquities in Peru is a highly punishable criminal offence. During the early 1970s police as well as journalists took an interest in the Ica case, and it was simply expedient for villagers such as Basilio, who by then made a living from selling the stones,to insist that they had manufactured them personally to avoid arrest and imprisonment. As for the geological analysis sponsored by the Horizon team, it should be remembered that they examined only two stones, one thought to be genuine, out of tens of thousands. The sweeping conclusion drawn from this one test is contradicted by the results from a much larger sample, conducted by Eric Wolf, a geologist employed by the Mauricio Hoshchild Mining Company. Examining 33 stones which Dr Cabrera deemed to be genuine, Wolf reported on a "fine layer of oxidation which also covers the incisions of the engravings, a condition which enables one to deduce their great age". If the stones are genuine antiquities, any description of the scientific importance would be a clear understatement. With regard to their origin, Afford follows Cabrera's surmise that they may be the work of survivors from a surprisingly advanced prehistoric culture, otherwise completely annihilated by a global catastrophe along Velikovskian lines. The cause of such a catastrophe, Afford feels, is most likely to have been one of the comets depicted in fearsome dimensions on many of the stones. While a "lost" Ica civilisation would hardly be the first forgotten society to be rediscovered by archaeology - the Sumerians, Hittites and indeed most of the civilisations of Pre-Columbian America being classic examples - the evidence of the stones would shake up a lot more than currently held views of ancient Peruvian history. The scenes of men and dinosaurs together are, however, not unique. Velikovsky has drawn attention to some of the evidence for the ____contemporaneity of men and dinosaurs (" Were All Dinosaurs Reptiles?", Kronos II:2, 1976, pp. 91-100). In southern Mexico at Acambaro models of dinosaurs occur in a vast collection (some 36,000 pieces) of ceramics, damned as "forgeries" in a case which reveals striking similarities to that of the Ica stones. American historian Professor Charles Hapgood* investigated the case and claimed to have witnessed the excavation of such models. ____Radiocarbon tests he arranged on organic material within the clay, and a thermoluminescence test on a ceramic piece, all gave results of the order of 3000 to 6000 years BP. Given the considerable problems inherent in the application of the methods, such results are far from conclusive, though they certainly suggest that more testing is in order. To further the study of the Ica stones Afford and Milewska are concerned that the stones should be immediately protected by the authorities, as well as being subjected to intense scientific scrutiny. A step is currently being taken by Dr Don Robins, a research chemist working at the Institute of Archaeology, London, and chemistry consultant for the SIS Review**. Robins specialises in the analysis of chemical traces on archaeological finds, and hopes that new methods he is developing will reveal something of the stones' history. Whatever the outcome, we may soon see a resolution of the Ica stones mystery. It is hoped that Afford and Milewska will make a presentation of the evidence to a S.I.S. meeting at some future date; in the meantime, members will be kept informed of any developments in this fascinating interdisciplinary puzzle. - P.J.J. Members interested in the Ica stones can contact Peter Afford and Sophie Milewska by writing to: c/o Ina Prentice, 4 Fairhaven Rd., Redland, Bristol BS6 7TX, England/UK. [* Charles Hapgood is a catastrophist writer best known for his books Maps of the Ancient Sea Kings (Chilton Books Co.: Philadelphia/New York/London, 1966) giving evidence of a recent shift in the Antarctic polar cap from ancient cartography, and The Path of the Pole (Chilton, 1970, originally published as Earth's Shifting Crust in 1958 with a foreward written by Albert Einstein) which outlines evidence and a detailed model for polar shift.[ ** See his article on "Isotopic Anomalies in Chronometric Science", SISR II:4 (1978), pp.108-110.\ cdrom\pubs\journals\review\v0604\092ica.htm
[SHOCK DYNAMICS OCCURRED UNDER 6,000 YEARS AGO]
38A. Common Sense About Ancient Maps [The Velikovskian $]
_From: The Velikovskian Vol 1 No 2 (1993) Home¦ Issue Contents Common Sense About Ancient Maps Charles Ginenthal In 1984, C. Leroy Ellenberger raised the issue of "ice cores" from Greenland and Antarctica as a form of evidence to test Velikovsky's theory, stating that there exists another heretofore generally ignored long-term stratigraphy that bears witness to the times covered by Worlds In Collision. This record resides in the ice caps in the Arctic and Antarctic, which contain a seasonal fluctuation in oxygen isotopes in the water comprising the ice. (1) Ellenberger continues: As a test of Velikovsky's scenario of historical cosmic catastrophes, the initial expectation was that the ice would preserve a series of conspicuous layers of cometary origin at the proper level. Such dust layers are not in evidence, but other signs of catastrophism could take the place of the missing dust. (2) Sean Mewhinney, in his papers "Ice Cores and Common Sense," (Parts 1 and 2 in the January and July, 1990, issues of Catastrophism and Ancient History) further developed the concepts raised by Ellenberger. If Ellenberger and Mewhinney's evidence, derived from ice cores of the Greenland and Antarctic ice caps, is truly valid, it would be completely impossible for ancient man to have mapped these large land masses accurately - - specially the topography. Ancient man could not have done so because Greenland and Antarctica had to have been buried beneath ice thousands of feet thick; there would have been no way to see this topography since ice and snow covered it and had given it somewhat the form of a mesa. This is especially true for Greenland and only partially true for certain regions of Antarctica. Mountain ranges, valleys, bays, etc., would have all been covered under thousands of feet of ice and snow. However, there are ancient maps of Greenland and Antarctica known to exist for a long time, which, if accurate in terms of the location of these regions - - with respect to latitude and longitude and to topography - - would prove that the ice caps are not ancient. If these ice caps formed after Velikovsky's catastrophic scenario, then the ice cores and the evidence analyzed from them by the glaciologists is based on a false premise and is not a test of Velikovsky's hypothesis.
_GREENLAND
_Arlington Mallery and Mary Roberts Harrison, in their book, The Rediscovery of Lost America, devote a few chapters to these maps. The chapter "The Zeno Maps of the North," deals with a map published in Europe in 1558 by one of the descendants of Antonio and Nicolo Zeno, who visited Iceland, where they obtained a map of the North Atlantic Ocean which includes a representation of Greenland. According to the authors: The Greenland depicted differs radically from the Greenland known to the modern world. The land surface is shown free of ice, almost covered by mountains crossed by open rivers and divided into three islands! (Mallery's emphasis.) A fiord, marked Ollum Lengri on a version of the map, and a flat surface, which I concluded was a strait, extending westward between the mountains, divide the land which, now hidden by ice, we know as Greenland, a single island.... So, assuming that the map was an ancient Norse sailing chart, I platted it on a polar projection. It became obvious that the original map had been platted on a portolano projection [ a map ] drawn so that sailing from one port to another is related to straight lines. Drawing grids on a copy of the Greenland section of the map, I found even more than I had dared to hope I would find: all the points were platted with remarkable accuracy when compared to the same points on the latest U.S. Army maps! I was then certain that the rejected Zeno map was an accurate map of Greenland before [Greenland] was covered by its present sheet of ice more than a mile thick.... Sooner than I would have thought possible, confirmation of my analysis of the map (at least the portion showing Greenland) came from an authority in the science of determining subglacial topography by seismic soundings. The authority was Paul Emile Victor, whose French Polar expedition explored Greenland from 1948 to 1951. An Associated Press news dispatch announced on October 26, 1951, months after I had published my analysis of the map, the following discovery of the Victor expedition: "A French expedition reported that Greenland is really three islands bridged by an ocean...." In a letter to me, dated October 22, 1953, Victor said: "The analysis of our soundings confirms the preliminary announcement that Greenland is really three islands...." Victor's soundings revealed a passage westward across Greenland, corresponding to the flat area between the mountains which I had pointed out as a strait dividing the land. They also showed ... a large fiord in a location corresponding to [that] on one version of the Zeno map of a fiord marked Ollum Lengri-Lengri, longest of all. In confirming my analysis of the Greenland portion of the Zeno map, Victor accomplished something of magnitude for cartographers, historians and scholars in general: [He] restored to the Zeno map its original reputation for authenticity.... Coming almost as an anticlimax to Victor's confirmation of the accuracy of the Zeno map, a later development strengthened this confirmation. When I asked Victor to explain the presence of a single mountain in the flat area crossing Greenland, he showed me his soundings, which proved the "mountain" to be an island. (3) What do professional cartographers think of the accuracy of this map of Greenland? M. I. Walters of the United States Navy Hydrographic Office - - the department of the U.S. Navy that makes maps - - in a radio interview held on August 26, 1956, and sponsored by Georgetown University, evaluated the map of Greenland: Mallery was introduced to me by the Head Engineer of the [U.S.] Navy Hydrographic Office ... with the request that I check with him an old map [of Greenland] which he had run across. I procured from our files a number of present-day charts and, together, we examined the map in question, which on first sight appeared to be a hobgoblin and of no real value. However, we began to check various islands, caves and peaks, and the old map showed astounding accuracy in presenting the land and water areas in their exact locations. (4) In other words, the Zeno map of Greenland, published in the 16th century, which shows Greenland to actually be three islands with mountainous topography and crossed by a strait, has been confirmed as accurate by scientists in the field of seismic sounding analysis and by professional cartographers. These experts proved that this map is both accurate and an authentic representation of Greenland without an ice cap covering it. Such an accurate map could only have been made prior to the time of the Victor expedition, when Greenland was not buried under thousands of feet of ice and when the climate had to be tremendously different. Thus, my first question to anyone who wishes to suggest that the Zeno map of Greenland is inaccurate is this, How could an accurate map of Greenland have been made showing the proper form of the island with respect to latitude and longitude, as well as to its topography, if the great island was buried under a huge ice cap for over 100,000 years? The probability of creating this chart out of pure imagination and being correct on so many points is practically nil. Whether or not historians accept the map, based on their concepts of uniformity or other historical considerations, cannot invalidate the accuracy of this map and proves that the ice cap is not ancient but was produced in historical times. In terms of Velikovsky's catastrophic scenario, this should not be surprising. He did make the specific claim in Earth in Upheaval that, during one of the catastrophes, the heated oceans lost some 20 feet of water which, as "snow, fell in huge masses" over the new polar regions. (5)
_ANTARCTICA
_If Greenland was not covered by a continental-type glacier because it was under the regime of a completely different climate, should not the same climatic condition generally pertain to Antarctica? In this respect, Mallery also discussed the Piri Re'is map compiled by a Turkish admiral in 1513. The original part of this map, examined by Mallery, was discovered in the Turkish National Museum in 1929, in the Topkapi Palace Library, Istanbul. The discovery of this map created an international sensation because it was thought that this was a copy of or the original map that Christopher Columbus had in his possession when he made his voyages to the New World. Analysis of the map, by researchers, in the 1930s, did not "resolve the contradictions posed by it." (6) The map is apparently a compilation of several other maps, because certain features are repeated on it and joined together. These mistakes notwithstanding, Mallery informs us that: During the first systematic examination of the map, I glanced again at the strange tail hanging off the southern extremity of South America, across the location where the Drake Passage [which] separates South America from Antarctica should have been. Suddenly unwilling to dismiss this tail as a distortion, as scholars had done, I pondered several possibilities, rejecting each of them. Then an astonishing idea came to me: [The long] tail is the coastline of the Palmer Peninsula of Antarctica, shown as it was before Antarctica was completely covered by ice. Immediately, I realized that the coastline not only shows the Palmer section of Antarctica but that the coastline of the Queen Maud section to the east was also shown free of ice.... (7) Mallery then got in touch with Captain Finn Ronne, who had explored the Palmer Peninsula between 1947 and 1948. Ronne suggested that a comparison of these areas of the Piri Re'is map be made with the Swithinbank map of Queen Maud Land published in the June, 1954, issue of the Geographical Journal. Mallery enlarged the Piri Re'is map so that it was brought into scale with the modern map and found, upon completion of this adjustment, that "[the] position of the islands and the coastlines on the ancient map corresponded strikingly with the position of the mountain peaks shown on the modern Swithinbank map of Queen Maud Land." (8) To check the accuracy and the projection of the Piri Re'is map, Mallery brought both maps to the U.S. Navy Hydrographic Office. According to Mallery: The Hydrographic Office checked the old map as I suggested, and they did much more. They constructed a Mercator chart of the Atlantic Ocean south of 45' north latitude and, bringing the Piri Re'is fragment to a common scale with it, placed the Piri Re'is coastline on the chart. In general, the two maps were in substantial agreement, particularly in regard to rock-bound harbors and headlands. Most of the discrepancies between the old map and the chart can be reasonably attributed to changes in the coastline caused by silt moving down to the coastline from the interior [or, based on Velikovsky's hypotheses, such changes would have been created by the catastrophes he described]. My associates and I were astonished several times while working on the old map at evidence of a superior level of technical capability in remote times. Some of the discrepancies between the old map and modern maps were due to errors on the modern maps. One such case involved two bays on the Piri Re'is map in a location where modern maps show land. I persuaded several experts to check the seismic soundings in that location. They found the bays were there. Modern cartographers had erred. The ancient map was accurate! (9) What then of the profile topography of the Piri Re'is map, compared to seismic analyses of these regions, like those carried out by Paul Emile Victor in Greenland? Mallery learned of a Norwegian-British-Swedish expedition to Antarctica, headed by John Viers in 1949, which had made a seismic profile of the topography beneath the ice cap. Specialists in the science of seismology and I, working together, were able to prove that geographical details on the map agree with that seismic profile: [The] topography (under the ice) of that part of Queen Maud Land agrees with the outline of the area on the map. The seismic soundings show that islands placed off the coast on the Piri Re'is map and bays placed between the island are there today under the ice. Specifically, the location of the islands on the old map agrees with the location of mountaintops that, according to the seismic profile, exist under the ice today; and that the bays are in locations where the profile shows below-sea-level areas today. (10) According to M. I. Walters, "...where present day charts are inaccurate or lacking in survey information [Mallery] has been able, with the use of these old maps, to supply missing data and correct errors." (11) Once again, we find that the Piri Re'is map, which shows areas of Antarctica published in 16th century maps, accurately outlines the dimensions and profile topography of the Palmer Peninsula and Queen Maud Land. This has all been confirmed as accurate by authorities in the fields of seismic analysis and cartography. These experts affirm that this map is an accurate and authentic representation of those parts of Antarctica without an ice cover. Once again, the only way that such an accurate map could have been made prior to this century is that these regions of Antarctica, today buried to great depth by ice, were ice-free in historical times and, to be so, had to have a tremendously different climate. Analysis of the rest of the Antarctic continent was thereafter carried out by Charles Hapgood upon detailed inspection of other old maps. The maps he employed were the Piri Re'is map and that of Oronteus Fine - - the Oronteus Fineus map published in Europe in 1531. Hapgood, on discovery and inspection of the Oronteus Fineus map, felt that the general shape of the continent was startlingly like the outline of the continent on our modern map.... The position of the South Pole, nearly in the center of the continent, seemed about right. The mountain ranges that skirted the coasts suggested the numerous ranges that had been discovered in Antarctica in recent years. It was obvious, too, that this was no slapdash creation of someone's imagination. The mountain ranges were individualized, some definitely coastal and some not. From most of them, rivers were shown flowing into the sea following, in every case, what looked like very natural and very convincing drainage patterns. This suggested, of course, that the coasts may have been ice-free when the original map was drawn. The deep interior, however, was free entirely of rivers and mountains, suggesting that the ice might have been present there [or that the region had not been explored. (12) Upon further inspection of the map, Hapgood found that the "upper part of the Peninsula was omitted from the Oronteus Fineus [map], as it apparently also had been ... from the Piri Re'is [map]." (13) Hapgood then measured two cross-sections across Antarctica on a modern map and two cross-sections of the same traverses on the old map in centimeters and millimeters to see if the lengths of the two sets of lines from one map would show the same ratios with those of the other. Such a finding would show that the old map was in good general agreement with its modern counterpart. For both traverses, the ratios turned out to be eight to seven, which lent support to the overall structure of the old map. It would have been exceedingly improbable that such a ratio would have been found if the Oronteus Fineus was simply an invention. However, Hapgood, by applying latitudes to the old map, discovered that Antarctica was so large it would intrude on the tip of South America, a clear impossibility. He also found that the Antarctic Circle on the Oronteus Fineus map was almost exactly the same as the 80th degree of latitude on the analyzed copy of the map. This indicated that, when the old map was reconstructed by Oronteus Fineus or his forerunners, the 80th parallel of latitude had been mistaken for the Antarctic Circle. It was this mistake that had enlarged the size of the continent some four times. When Hapgood corrected the latitude scale for the entire map, he found that "the size of the Antarctic continent on the map of Oronteus Fineus [was] correct, by modern findings." (14) With this information in hand, Hapgood and his colleagues constructed a grid. We tried to identify, by comparison with modern maps, as many places on this map of Antarctica as possible. The result was electrifying. All the errors of the location of places that we had identified on Oronteus Fineus' own grid were greatly reduced. (15) But, in spite of this "amazing accuracy in the positions of many places, there were still numerous errors." (16) By analyzing the positions of longitude on different parts of the map, Hapgood found some longitudes were here too far to the east, there too far to the west. In essence, the lines of longitude on the old map had been drawn curved instead of straight. On a modern polar projection map, lines of longitude are drawn from the Antarctic Circle straight out, like cuts in a round pie. This was not the case with the Oronteus Fineus map; its lines of longitude were all curved in only one direction. When this correction was made, the identified locations of geographical places increased from 32 to 50 and other error averages were also reduced. What must be stressed at this point of the analysis is that any of the changes made by Hapgood were applied to the entire map. If the map was actually an invention, the adjustments would never have allowed all the sites to fall into their correct positions. If the map was an invention, many different parts of the map would each require their own individual adjustment to become congruent with the actual geographical structure of the Antarctic continent, specially in view of the fact that the Oronteus Fineus map was published in 1531 and Antarctica was not discovered by Europeans until 1818. In his book, The Path of the Pole, page 116, Hapgood overlaid the reconstructed Oronteus Fineus map, drawn to scale, with a modern map of Antarctica, giving the latitudes and longitudes 55 points along the continents' shoreline that show an overall, fine general agreement between the old and modern maps. He states: "The mathematical probabilities of anyone accidentally getting so many points right on a map are fewer than one in a hundred million." (17) Of course, there was no perfect agreement, but this should not be expected. Longitude measurements did not become accurate until after the invention of the chronometer by John Harrison, in England during the 1760s and, concurrently, by J. A. Lepaute and Ferdinand Berthoud in France. Thus, it is to be expected, that, specially at the poles, errors would occur! Furthermore, if the Earth had actually experienced the momentous catastrophes described by Velikovsky, then there should naturally be vertical and horizontal displacements of geological structures. Thereafter, Hapgood sought to test his analysis of the Oronteus Fineus map by having it evaluated by the Cartographic Section of the Strategic Air Command at Westover Air Force Base in Massachusetts. After rigorously testing the map and Hapgood's applied analysis, the Chief of the section wrote the following: It is our opinion that the accuracy of the cartographic features shown on the Oronteus Fineus map (1531) suggest beyond a doubt that it also was compiled from accurate source maps of Antarctica, ... in this case of the entire continent. Close examination has proved [that] the original source maps must have been compiled at a time when the land mass and inland waterways of the continent were relatively free of ice. The conclusion is further supported by International Geophysical Year teams in their measurements of the subglacial topography. (Emphasis added.) The comparison also suggests that the original source maps (compiled in antiquity) were prepared when Antarctica was presumably free of ice. The Cordiform Projection used by Oronteus Fineus suggests the use of advanced mathematics. Further, the shape given to the Antarctic continent suggests the possibility, if not the probability, that the original source maps were compiled on a stereographic [construction] on a flat surface of lines representing a solid in perspective or gnomonic [construction] on a flat surface of curved lines to represent a sphere type of projection (involving the use of spherical trigonometry). We are convinced that the findings made by you and your associates are valid, and that they raise extremely important questions affecting geology and ancient history.... (18) Not only do these cartographers say the map is accurate, but they point out that, during the 1957 to 1958 Geophysical Year, other teams of seismic scientists, like that of Paul Emile Victor, went into Antarctica and made soundings of the topography under the ice, and that these soundings confirmed the accuracy of the Oronteus Fineus map. Therefore, we have the Piri Re'is map of Antarctica confirmed as accurate by the U.S. Navy Hydrographic Office and the Norwegian-British-Swedish Expedition of 1949, and the Oronteus Fineus map of Antarctica confirmed as accurate by Strategic Air Command's map office and the International Geophysical Year teams of 1957 to 1958. These findings are further corroborated by other evidence. According to Hapgood: During the Byrd Expedition of 1947-1948, Dr. Jack Hough, then of the University of Illinois, took three cores from the bottom of the ocean off the Ross Sea, and these were dated by the ionium method of radioactive dating, of the Carnegie Institution in Washington, by Dr. W. D. Urry, ... one of those to develop this method. The cores showed alternations of types of sediments.... There was a coarse glacial sediment, as was to be expected, and fine sediments of semiglacial type, but there were also layers of finer sediments typical of temperate climates. [These were the sort ...] carried down by rivers from ice-free continents. Here was the first surprise, then. Temperate conditions had evidently prevailed in Antarctica in the not distant past. The sediment[s indicated that, no fewer than three times during the Pleistocene Epoch, a temperate climate had prevailed in the Ross Sea. Then, when this material was dated by Urry, it was revealed that the most recent temperate period had been very recent indeed. In fact, it ended only about 6,000 years ago. Hough wrote: "The log of core N-5 shows glacial marine sediment from the present to 6,000 years ago. From 6,000 to 15,000 years ago, the sediment is fine-grained, with the exception of one granule at about 12,000 years ago. This suggests an absence of ice from the area during that period, except for a stray iceberg 12,000 years ago." (19) This evidence is further corroborated by Reginald Daly, who informs us that "[carbon-14] dating has shown that Antarctica's ice is less than 6,000 years old. (Emphasis added.) [Arthur Holmes writes: `Algal remains dated at 6,000 BP [Before Present] have been found on the latest terminal moraines.'" (20) Thus, in addition to the accuracy of the Piri Re'is map and the Oronteus Fineus map of Antarctica, we have measurements from cores in the Ross Sea and from the last glacial deposits containing a temperate species of algae that also show that Antarctica was not covered by ice 6,000 years ago. The evidence indicates that the Piri Re'is and Oronteus Fineus maps of Antarctica, published in the 16th century, are accurate and authentic representations of the continent as has been confirmed by scientists in the fields of seismic soundings and cartography. This shows that ____Antarctica was largely ice-free 6,000 years ago and is corroborated by evidence of cores from the Ross Sea and by the dating of algae in terminal moraines. The only way that such accurate maps could have been made prior to the 16th century is if Antarctica was not buried under thousands of feet of ice, when its climate had to be tremendously different. This brings me to my second question, How could these accurate maps have been made if Antarctica has had an ice cap of thousands of feet covering it and is often surrounded by immense and dangerous flows of sea ice and icebergs? Mankind did not have iron ships in ancient times; this also precluded the view that the maps of Antarctica were made when the same conditions pertained then as today. One more point before continuing. Just because we do not know who originally made these maps nor how they were made, we cannot argue that they are fraudulent. We cannot assume, because it took until the 18th century to make precise maps, that ancient man must have lacked the knowledge and skills to execute these charts. The Babylonian and Mayan civilizations, though primitive compared to modern civilization, carried out astronomical research with an accuracy that was not attained until the 19th century, when highly precise and technically advanced telescopes and other measuring devices made modern man the equals of these past cultures. We still do not know how ancient man in South America moved and raised stones of immense weight to build his temples, but he did. Therefore, since we do not know how it was done we cannot deny it was done. The same applies to the maps. To reject them is to assume that, because we believe such productions are impossible, they must be fraudulent. And this, I suggest, is the fundamental problem behind their rejection by the establishment. The underlying logic is based on belief and not on the evidence, as I will show. David C. Jolley, of Brookline, Massachusetts, who publishes an annual handbook for the rare map trade, has raised questions regarding the validity of the Piri Re'is and Oronteus Fineus maps of Antarctica in The Skeptical Inquirer. (21) His article is, I believe, an accurate analysis of a belief system, rather than of a scholarly or evidential system, and is typical of too many establishment paladins of the status quo. To begin with, Jolley omits from his discussion of the maps any of the facts brought out above. He never mentions that professional cartographers from the U.S. Navy Hydrographic Office, who examined and analyzed the maps, concluded that the Piri Re'is map, which shows the Palmer Peninsula and Queen Maud Land, is an accurate depiction of these land areas. Jolley has also left out of his discussion the Norwegian-British-Swedish Expedition to Antarctica, headed by John Viers, that made a seismic study of these regions and proved not only that the topography of the Piri Re'is map was accurate, but that, in some cases, it was even more accurate than the modern maps of the same areas and that this information was also attested to by the cartographers of the United States Navy. He further omits from his discussion of the Oronteus Fineus map that the cartographers of the Cartographic Section of the Strategic Air Command, U.S. Air Force, wrote, after examination and analysis of this chart, It is our opinion that the accuracy of the cartographic features shown in the Oronteus Fineus map (1531) suggest(s) beyond a doubt that it was compiled from source maps of Antarctica, but in this case the entire continent [and] we are convinced that the findings made by you [Hapgood] and your associates are valid. (22) Jolley also does not discuss the fact that these cartographers based their conclusion of the accuracy of the Oronteus Fineus map "further supported by the International Geophysical Year teams in their measurements of the subglacial topography." (23) Nor does he discuss the finding by Jack Hough that cores from the Ross Sea indicate that Antarctica had no ice cover between 15,000 and 6,000 years ago, the climate was warm enough for this type of algae to grow. This evidence was introduced to bring forth a response based on evidence and not belief regarding the accuracy of these maps. As Jolley stated, "Within my own experience fresh ideas, supported by evidence, have always been welcome." (24) (Emphasis added.) Since there has been no discussion by Jolley of the work by Mallery and Victor regarding the accuracy of the Zeno Map of Greenland, I welcome evidence from anyone who responds, asking that all the evidence be dealt with so that nothing is left out and to allow only the evidence to speak for the truth of the validity of these maps.
_References
1. C. Leroy Ellenberger, "Still Facing Many Problems (Part I),"
38B. Old World Maps - - A Response to Charles Ginenthal [The Velikovskian]
_From: The Velikovskian Vol 2 No 2 (1994) Home¦ Issue Contents Old World Maps - - A Response to Charles Ginenthal Norman Schwarz
_ABSTRACT
_Charles Ginenthal's article, "Common Sense About Ancient Maps", in Vol. 1, No. 2 of The Velikovskian adduced evidence that various Renaissance and earlier world maps were really the product of an old, but historical civilization that went back to a time before the present polar ice reformed. He issued a challenge to anyone who could present evidence of the validity of these old maps. This essay answers his challenge using only specific information from reputable scholars, scientifically measured data, primary arithmetic and the maps themselves.
_OLD WORLD MAPS
_Charles Ginenthal, publisher of The Velikovskian, published "Common Sense About Ancient Maps" (1) in Volume I, Number 2. In his article, he refers to "The Zeno Maps of the North," published in 1558, the Piri Re'is map compiled in 1513, and the Oronteus Finaeus map published in 1532. He also gives the analysis of the Piri Re'is map by Charles Hapgood in his Maps of the Ancient Sea Kings. Zeno's maps show an unglaciated Greenland and the Piri Re'is map shows an unglaciated Antarctica. Hapgood subtitled his book "Evidence of Advanced Civilization in the Ice Age" and Ginenthal says that Antarctica was ice-free in historical times. The United States Air Force and Navy mapping services agreed that, if the ice were removed, Greenland and Antarctica would look much like it is shown on these old maps. Mr. Ginenthal concludes his article with a challenge to bring forth evidence regarding the accuracy (and, presumably, the source) of these ancient maps. I accept his challenge. Charles Hapgood presented clear evidence of three former north poles before our present one at 90 N. (2) Moving back from the present, they are: A) Hudson Bay (60 N, 83 W), B) Greenland Sea (73 N, 10 E) and C) Yukon (63 N, 135 W). In an earlier essay, I offered geographic evidence for two more former north poles to go along with the Hapgood list. (3) Including these poles, the list would be: A) Hudson Bay (63 N, 83 W), D) Off N.E. Brazil (0, 37.72 W), X) Siberia (55.67 N, 52.28 E), B) Greenland Sea (73 N, 10 E) and C) Yukon (63 N, 135 W).
_LONGITUDE
_Most kingdoms considered themselves to be the center of the world; and when the time came for map making, they set themselves in the "center." Nothing could be done about the Equator, it was where it was; but longitude is an abstract matter. The Greeks put their Prime Meridian through Alexandria; the Portuguese through Lisbon; the Spanish through Madrid; the French through Paris and the English through Greenwich (virtually, London). By the 1800s, the British had control of the world sea lanes. Their Admiralty Charts were the finest and their Prime Meridian was (and is) Greenwich. All the important seagoing nations used British charts, but the French and Spanish did not give up on Paris and Madrid as the Prime Meridians on their (marked up British Admiralty) charts until the end of the 19th century. As for finding longitude, that was a difficult problem. For mariners, it took an accurate, serviceable "sea clock," a chronometer. None was produced until the British offered a £20,000 (about $1,000,000 now) prize for one. The winning chronometer was selected in 1762. On land, however, a skillful and patient astronomer could use the Moon as a clock to determine longitude. A concomitant mapping problem was the length of one degree. Researchers into ancient history have shown that the Babylonians correctly measured the length of one degree of longitude millennium before the chronometer was invented. (4)
_THE ANCIENT CENTER OF LONGITUDE
_Hapgood illustrates many old maps. The World Map of Ptolemy has its 90 longitude line through the eastern tip of the Arabian peninsula. (5) Ninety degrees west of this line is the present 38 west longitude which was used, in the Papal Bull Inter Caetera of May 4, 1493, to delimit the Spanish and Portuguese division of the Earth. (6) Christopher Columbus returned to Spain on March 15, 1493, so the principals to the agreement (Portugal, Spain, the Vatican) had only seven weeks to arrive at an understanding. They must have had a reliable map of the world (at least the 180 degrees from Brazil to Japan) that everyone trusted. And if they started to negotiate before Columbus got back, the point is even more valid. The 90 meridian is at the same place (through the eastern tip of the Arabian peninsula), though the degree numbering has been reversed on the Robert Thorne map of 1525. (7) The Bordone map of 1528 indicates this same meridian of longitude, in the center of the figure, at the diagonal crossing. (8) The center line of the Oronteus Finaeus map of 1532 is the same meridian through the eastern tip of the Arabian peninsula. (9) Mercator's World Map of 1538 shows this same line as the horizontal division of the two hemispheres. (10) One of the more amazing indications of this meridian (through the eastern tip of the Arabian peninsula) is on the Reimal map, where it is identified as the "Prime Meridian of [the?] Portuguese Map." (11) If true Christians had made these maps (originally), the center (Prime Meridian) would have been through Rome, like on the Ben Zara map of 1487. (12) If Jews had made them, the Prime Meridian would have been through Jerusalem; and if Moslems had made them, the Prime Meridian would have been through either Mecca or Medina. As they stand, the Prime Meridian goes through the Indian Ocean and 90 W is through the middle of the Atlantic Ocean!
_FIRST POINT OF ARIES
_Spring, in the northern hemisphere, starts, by definition, at the beginning of the Vernal Equinox - - which is at about March 21st each year. Spring is important because the farmers know when to start the count for the planting season. From antiquity, the beginning of spring has been placed at "the First Point of Aries," meaning the zodiac house of Aries (not the stellar constellation). Each of the zodiac houses is assigned 30 degrees. So, with twelve zodiac houses at 30 degrees each, a complete rotation is 360 degrees. Likewise, one complete [r?]evolution of the zodiac was 25,920 years (13) - - equal to 2,160 years per "house." One of the problems which has deviled ancient and modern astronomers and mathematicians is that the original Babylonian, "First Point of Aries" was, for some reason, not placed at "zero" but at eight degrees (of the 30 degrees) into Aries. (14) (The Precession of the Equinoxes moves the Vernal Equinox point 50.2 inches per year, but the Babylonians used 50 inches per year. So the original "First Point of Aries" is now in Pisces). Nevertheless, spring is still spring; that is, the Vernal Equinox is still the time of equal day and night. The problem is that, for at least 4,000 years, there was no division between astrology and astronomy - - even Copernicus cast horoscopes. Since remote antiquity, star locations were based on measuring from the "First point of Aries" to find a star's longitude (right ascension); the astronomers and astrologers had always measured this way and it has never stopped. But why would the most excellent astronomers of antiquity, whose results were not excelled for 4,000 years, put the First Point at eight degrees and not "zero" degrees of Aries? If the Babylonians had been like the Greeks, Spanish, British, etc., they would have put their Prime Meridian through Babylon; but they did not! For everyone, ever since the time of the Babylonians, the Zero of Longitude was an abstract; for the Babylonians, it was a matter of geography. The Babylonians put their Prime Meridian (call it the First Meridian - - F. M.) through the present North Pole and the location where the gods had resided in the North. That point is North Pole X (NPX), located on our present grid at 56.35 N, 52.28 E. The geodesic through 90 N and 52.28 E is the First Meridian; and this is the reason for the eight degree offset in the "First Point of Aries." This meridian is the 90 degree meridian, the meridian through the eastern tip of the Arabian peninsula, on the ancient maps enumerated above. F. M. is at 52.28 E; Babylon is at 32.33 N, 44.25 E). The difference in longitude between them is 52.28 - 44.25= 8.03. Their Center of Longitude may have been at 52.28 E, but it was spring in Babylon that counted. By definition, the equinox is the point of intersection of the ecliptic and the celestial equator. When the equinoctial point was at 52.28 E, the Babylonians set their "zodiac clock." The movement of this point is the "Precession of the Equinoxes." A movement of eight degrees corresponds to 576 years (later). So, about 576 years after it was "spring" on the eastern tip of the Arabian peninsula, it was "spring" in Babylon - - when the equinoctial point was through the meridian of Babylon.
_THE AGE OF PISCES
_Virgil, the pagan Roman poet, was virtually made a saint by the Catholic Church for his announcement, in 6 B.C., that the Age of Pisces was at hand and that Virgo (the Virgin) was about to come forth. (15) The Age of Pisces is why early Christians considered it appropriate to identify Christ with a fish. The "opening" of the Age of Pisces was said to occur when the Great Conjunction (of Saturn and Jupiter) was near the star Zeta Piscium (Fish) and when "it coincided in longitude with the Vernal Equinox in the year 572 (A.D.) of our era." (16)
_WHEN
_We now have enough information to figure out and check the "when" of the Babylonian First Point of Aries. I will assume that Virgil's announcement of 6 B.C. meant 6 B.C. (But he may have meant shortly thereafter.) For the zodiac Sun to move from Aries to Pisces in 6 B.C. means that 2,160 years before 6 B.C., in 2166 B.C., the Sun moved from Taurus to Aries. Remembering that the "Zero Point" for the start of the Age of Aries is the First Meridian, then the First Point of Aries in Babylon was 576 years later (2166 - 576), in 1590 B.C. Babylon is 8.03 longitude from the F. M. (8= a good approximation) and 8.03 into Aries equals 578.16 years, not the 576 years used previously. This puts the Babylonian First Point of Aries at (2166 - 578), or 1588 B.C. The above quote about the Vernal Equinox of 572 A.D. means that, ignoring the none[non?] zero between A.D. and B.C., 572 years (A.D.) plus 1588 years (B.C.) equals one "hour" of zodiac time (572+ 1588= 2,160 years). However, after the time of the Babylonians (except for the Egyptians), everyone was a bit sloppy about counting years; so, it is all just a close approximation. Another relative check is the fact that, from c. 2050 B.C., the Babylonian year began with the month of Nisan (March-April), sometime near the Vernal Equinox. (17)
_SUMMARY
1. Six old maps have been presented which show a readily identifiable meridian (52 E) that passes through the eastern tip of the Arabian peninsula. One of the maps even calls it the "Prime Meridian of [the? Portuguese Map."
2. Ninety degrees west of the "Prime Meridian of [the?] Portuguese Map" is the 38 W meridian used, by papal authority, in 1493 to delineate Spanish world claims from Portuguese world claims.
3. The First Point of Aries, from which the longitude of stars are measured, and which at some time represented the Spring Equinox, is eight degrees into Aries and not at the Aries "Zero Point." The reason for the eight degree offset is that the time set by the Babylonians for the beginning of the Age of Aries is when the Vernal Equinox was at longitude 52 E - - at about 2166 B.C. However, the Babylonian astronomers worked at Babylon, and not at 52 E. They established their epoch for right ascension measurements at Babylon, eight degrees (576 years) into the Age of Aries.
_CONCLUSION
_The ancient maps of the sea kings really are ancient. They go so far back that no one really understands just how far back that is. Their use of the First Meridian shows that the maps were copied from Babylonian or, perhaps, Sumerian originals - - maybe from the predecessors of the Sumerians.
_NOTES
_A. Hapgood stresses that the maps are really old and says that they represent evidence of a united world culture in remote antiquity. (18) In another essay, I offer proof of his assertion by showing that there was an ancient worldwide system of measures used around the Mediterranean Sea, in the Near East, China, Japan, the Americas and Western Europe. (19)
_B. Using eclipse data as a reference point for Babylonian chronology has not worked. The zodiac "clock" setting of 2166 B.C. for the change from the Age of Taurus to the Age of Aries "spring" along 52.28 E is an explicitly astronomical event. This could be the reference line for Babylonian Chronology.
_References
1. Charles Ginenthal, "Common Sense About Ancient Maps," The Velikovskian 1: 2 (1993): 7-17.
2. Charles H. Hapgood (A), The Path of the Pole (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1970), pp. 94, 106, 160. 3. Norman Schwarz, "Arcana Mundi - - The Great Circles
38C. Analysis Of Old World Maps [The Velikovskian]
_From: The Velikovskian Vol 2 No 2 (1994) Home¦ Issue Contents Analysis Of Old World Maps Charles Ginenthal
_In "Old World Maps - - A Response to Charles Ginenthal," Norman Schwarz's critique of my article, "Common Sense About Ancient Maps" (1) he contends that the longitude of the Oronteus Finaeus map of 1532 is the same as that of Ptolemy's World Map; the Papal Bull Inter Caetera of May 4, 1493; Robert Thorne's map of 1525; the Mercator World Map of 1538 and the Reimal Map. Therefore, since each of these maps correlates with the original draft of the Oronteus Finaeus map, showing the Prime Meridian of longitude, one can extrapolate from these agreements as to the time and place of the map's creators and place the original map maker in Mesopotamia of ancient historical time. By further extrapolation, Schwarz calculates to the Vernal Equinox and retrocalculates the precession of the North Pole back to that period and place. Schwarz concludes that these agreements show that there has been no change in either longitude or latitude, as Velikovsky's theory requires, and that his catastrophes cannot be real - - based on these measurements. But no one can know when the map was drawn nor can one say, with certainty, where it originated. This, in itself, casts doubt on the assumption Schwarz makes of the map's time and origin. If the position of the extrapolated Prime Meridian of longitude were correct with respect to the Oronteus Finaeus map, Mr. Schwarz's argument could have had some validity. But it does not. In order to ascertain whether or not these meridians of longitude are truly related to the original map from which Oronteus Finaeus produced his chart, the lines of longitude must converge at the South Pole as found in Oronteus Finaeus' copy of the original. They do not. Charles Hapgood explains: As our study continued, it gradually began to appear [that] the Oronteus Finaeus network of parallels [of] latitude and meridians [of] longitude did not fit the Antarctic as shown on his world map. Apparently a projection had been imposed by him on a source map originally drawn with a very different kind of map grid. How were we to discover the nature of this original network of parallels and meridians? (2) (Emphasis added.) Thus, the original map from which Oronteus Finaeus drew his world chart could not have used the original lines of longitude which Schwarz claims. Hapgood continues: The position of the pole looked quite correct at first glance, as I have mentioned, but as our study and comparison of the old map with modern maps continued, we could see that the map maker had apparently made a mistake of a few degrees in locating the pole. We found what seemed a truer position by measuring across the [Antarctic] continent in several directions and finding the position that would divide all the diameters of the continent in approximately the same ratio as shown on modern maps. This, of course, was an extension of our first measurement [which] showed that the ratios of the longest and shortest traverses on the modern and Oronteus Finaeus map were the same, that is eight to seven. It was only an empirical experiment, but it seemed to give a more satisfactory result in terms of the latitudes and identifiable places. (3) With this adjusted pole as a center, Hapgood began to work with the map. Hapgood also had to be sure that the Antarctic continent was properly oriented with respect to Africa and South America. He states: When we came to the meridians, we had to deal with another problem. It did not seem to us at first that the [Antarctic] continent was properly oriented in relation to the other continents. To get correct longitude readings for our Antarctic coasts on the old map, we naturally had to line it up with the meridians on the modern map of Antarctica that had survived for several millennia; someone could have placed it askew on the world map. We thought it looked as if the continent ought to be rotated about [20] to the East to bring it into a correct relationship with the other continents. We selected, empirically, what looked like a reasonable "Prime Meridian" and then laid out the other meridians at [5] degree intervals, thus constructing our grid. (4) When one rotates Antarctica several degrees about its pole position, all the meridians also rotate with it the same number of degrees. Hence, it is clearly impossible for the original "Prime Meridian" to survive with the same placement. The original map did not contain the lines of longitude Schwarz ascribes to it. The meridians of longitude were inserted after the original source map was drawn and the Antarctic continent was rotated 20. Therefore, the original map cannot be assigned to the place and time that Schwarz indicates nor can any relationship be extrapolated to the spring equinox of ancient Babylon. To do so means to disregard the fundamental map corrections made for accuracy. The difference between the original position of the South Pole on the Oronteus Finaeus map and its true displacement is not small, as Hapgood claims. The full displacement of the South Pole measures close to 552 miles, a location difference of about 8 south of the Atlantic Ocean. Since all the meridians meet at the pole, displacing it 552 miles displaces all the meridians. By rotating the Antarctic continent several degrees and then moving its pole position 552 or so miles, it is impossible to agree with Schwarz's conclusions. Nevertheless, let us imagine that all these disagreements regarding the meridians do not exist. If Babylon and the continents were in their original positions on an Earth with the same 23.5 axial tilt, then Antarctica and Greenland were also in the same position with respect to the Earth's tilt. Antarctica would have been covered by an ice sheet and should have been virtually impossible to map. However, we have maps which have been examined by cartographers and seismologists who proved that the cartographic features and the topographic features are highly accurate. This accuracy would be impossible based on the gradualist conditions that would have to be in force. What critics of these old maps must confront is, Why are they so accurate? Those who ignore this question cannot hope to be taken seriously. They must present clear, straightforward evidence that the maps are inaccurate. For example, this clear, straightforward evidence has not been presented in the Skeptical Inquirer. If the evidence were so readily available, David Jolley, a cartographer, would have presented it. Cartography is his work. Instead, Jolley has kept silent regarding what cartographers and seismologists have shown. These other experts, after careful analysis, claim that the maps are accurate with respect to latitude and longitude, and subglacial topography.
_References
1. Charles Ginenthal, "Common Sense About Ancient Maps," The Velikovskian I: 2 (New York, 1993): 7-17.
2. Charles Hapgood, Maps of the Ancient Sea Kings, revised ed. (New York, 1979), pp. 77-74.
3. Ibid., p. 74.
4. Ibid.
\cdrom\pubs\journals\velikov\vol0202\analysis.htm
Carl Sagan And Immanuel Velikovsky [Aeon Journal]
_From: Aeon II:3 (1990) Home¦ Issue Contents Carl Sagan And Immanuel Velikovsky by Charles Ginenthal
_CARL SAGAN AND IMMANUEL VELIKOVSKY IS an analysis of a scientific debate respecting the theory of Immanuel Velikovsky held at a symposium under the auspices of the American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS in San Francisco in 1974. One of the participants in the debate, Professor Carl Sagan of Cornell University, raised, there and elsewhere, a host of questions and points of severe criticism of Velikovsky's thesis. Charles Ginenthal, the author of this work, has gone into all aspects of this criticism and has exhaustively outlined the evidence with data from the scientific literature. The analysis is devastating: the definitive response to the Sagan-Velikovsky debacle. It debunks in lucid terms, point by point, each and every issue raised. It is sometimes humorous and often scathingly critical. No one who reads this material will have the slightest doubt about the nature of this further chapter in the "Velikovsky Affair. CARL SAGAN AND IMMANUEL VELIKOVSKY will be hailed by some
Carl Sagan: A Life by Keay Davidson [Aeon Journal]
... tribute to Davidson's journalistic skills as a reporter. However, the additional 70 pages of appended Notes give insights into the journalist himself and his selection of sources, of which there are indeed hundreds - - some of which may be questionable. Here, for a prime example, he refers to Charles Ginenthal's "vitriolic" 1995 book as "a 448-page tome" on Sagan and Velikovsky, [9 that was printed by a Tempe, Ariz., publishing house that also puts out books on astrology, magic, and voodoo. Ginenthal is thus given a not very subtle "veiled glove" slap, a guilt-by-association impression that the publisher must have had a hand in its writing. Ginenthal, of course, does not appear in the extensive 19-page Bibliography. However, astronomer Donald Goldsmith, the editor of Scientists Confront Velikovsky, does. Meanwhile, any references to counter-critical works, such as Velikovsky and Establishment Science [10 and "Scientists Confront Scientists Who Confront Velikovsky," [11 are notably missing. Further, the author admits that his richest source for
Oberg's Unscientific Method [The Velikovskian]
_From: The Velikovskian Vol 1 No 4 (1993) Home¦ Issue Contents Oberg's Unscientific Method Charles Ginenthal "Scholars are not expected to take anyone's word on faith."(1) I thank James E. Oberg for taking the time to write a critical reply to "The Moon in Upheaval."(2) His criticism of that work, while very incomplete, unfortunately often turns out to be factually incorrect and is based on carefully evading the evidence produced. His criticism tends to argue three points. They are: to attack the citations presented, while, at the same time, calling them "factually correct"; to attack the lack of mathematical and physical models, which he suggests proves my statements incorrect (he does so without presenting counter mathematics as support to attack the evidence and without presenting counter evidence); to use, repeatedly, the term pseudoscience or its derivatives over and over to cover up the inadequate nature of his own criticism (the final refuge of critics who cannot deal with evidence). Not content with
Discussion & Questions From the Floor [Aeon Journal]
... the rotation rate of the planet, the rotation rate of the satellites, the velocity of the satellite (itself solely determined by orbit diameter and planet mass), the mass of the satellite, the properties of the planet and satellite constituent materials, and the presence of any residual magnetic field from the previous magnetic events. Patten's math model attempts to consider as many of these parameters for which we have data, and attempts to nest in a tight system of logic where data is absent. NEPTUNE A GOOD TEST SPEAKER: CHARLES GINENTHAL - - I wish to thank Mr. Windsor for taking the time from his present busy schedule to submit a criticism of Electro-Gravitic theory. He claims that my "theory would be more persuasive were (certain) discrepancies in logic not present." However, in criticising my hypothesis for the explanation of the generation of electro-magnetic fields in celestial bodies, he is misinformed. He writes, for example: "If planet spin rate and orbit relative to the Sun cause an electromagnetic field..." He raises the same
THE CATACLYSM: Vol. I, No. 1: Contents [Aeon Journal]
... by the author's model. Venus in Ancient Myth and Language Associate Editor of KRONOS, Ev Cochrane, examines a wide range of cometary images attached to the planet Venus. First in a series of articles on the Venus comet in relation to the planet Saturn and the hypothesized polar configuration. Apollo and the Planet Mars Also by Ev Cochrane: The case for reassessing the famous Greek god in view of apparent links to very ancient Martian themes. The Electro-Gravitic Theory of Celestial Motion Following the lead of Ralph Juergens and Earl Milton, Charles Ginenthal outlines a new theory combining electromagnetic repulsion with gravity to account for rotational and orbital variations among celestial bodies. Ginenthal presently teaches science, math and history to the handicapped in New York City. Solar System Studies Retired engineer, Frederick F. Hall, formerly with the Stanford Linear Accelerator Laboratory, provides a timely excursion through the solar system and beyond, noting many issues of special interest to catastrophists today. Look for more detailed discussion on many of these topics in the months ahead. The Road to Saturn We present excerpts from
The Origin Of The Moon [The Velikovskian]
_From: The Velikovskian Vol 2 No 3 (1994) Home¦ Issue Contents The Origin Of The Moon Charles Ginenthal
_The origin of the Moon has been an extremely controversial problem among astronomers and geophysicists for a long time. There are, at present, four major theories under consideration by members of the astrophysical community. Each of the four groups of advocates has been attempting to show that the evidence for its position is strongest and that the other concepts are fundamentally unfounded. In this contest of hypotheses, Velikovsky has interpreted the mythology and arrived at the conclusion that the Moon was captured recently by the Earth and set into its present orbit. In "Earth Without a Moon," Velikovsky states: Democritus and Anaxagoras taught that there was a time when the Earth was without the Moon. Aristotle wrote that Arcadia in Greece, before being inhabited by the Hellenes, had a population of Pelasgians, and that these aborigines occupied the land already before there was a Moon in the sky above the Earth; for this reason, they were called Proselenes [people
Electro-gravitic cosmology [SIS Internet Digest]
_From: SIS Internet Digest 2002:1 (Sep 2002) Home¦ Issue Contents Electro-gravitic cosmology Charles Ginenthal Editor of The Velikovskian
_Immanuel Velikovsky's theory that the solar system has been unstable in historical times was based on the assumption that there was an electromagnetic force in celestial space. This follower of Velikovsky has enlarged upon this suggestion and developed a completely new theory of cosmology. The theory does not explain the origin of the Universe. It does not explain the origin of matter, energy or space. To do so requires creation ex nihilo, which requires a miracle. The theory takes as given that matter, energy and space have always existed and are changing form in a Universe that is eternal. The theory is based on the concept of fissioning; it offers that black holes containing masses of millions to hundred of billions of stars spin to instability and eject out of their poles masses that evolve into stars in the arms of spiral barred galaxies. These galaxies evolve to spiral galaxies and then to elliptical galaxies. Ellipticals may congregate in great clusters, such
[COMPARE WITH MATHIS]
39. Is Space A Superconducting Medium? [The Velikovskian]
_From: The Velikovskian Vol 1 No 2 (1993) Home¦ Issue Contents Is Space A Superconducting Medium? Charles Ginenthal
_An extraordinary experiment was reported in the New York Times regarding superconducting materials and magnets. It is well known that superconducting materials, at extremely low temperatures, repel all magnetic fields. The Times article for September 20, 1988, page C1, describes a "[chip] made of superconducting material, trapped in {a} magnetic field dangling below a magnet. As long as the chip stays cold enough, it will stay suspended." (See Figure 1, below.)
_Figure 1. Magnetic Field Action Based on Temperature
_As one can see, the materials are both attracted to the magnet and, at the same time, repelled by the magnet, and thus remain suspended in air. However, the determining factor as to whether the magnet attracts or repels is the temperature region. In the region where the temperature is extremely cold, the fields between the superconducting materials and the magnet repel one another while the reverse action occurs in the region where the temperature is well above that of the cold region. The questions that suggest themselves are: Do magnetic fields, when they meet in the super-cold environment of space, also repel each other? Is space a superconducting medium? This one is a difficult question to answer without experimental data from space to either confirm my hypothesis or deny it. Nevertheless, there are certain phenomena in space that appear to make this supposition correct. If space is a superconducting medium (by space I mean interplanetary and interstellar space) then all magnetic fields that we know about will repel each other. This, of course, can be observed with all planetary magnetic fields and the field of the Sun. The Sun's magnetic field repels the magnetic fields of all the planets. A further law of planetary motion also indicates that the magnetic fields of all the planets are repelling each other as strongly as possible. Earl Milton described this in KRONOS: Gravitational repulsion is, in theory, unknown. However, if the interaction between the planets (or the satellites) is analized, they move so as to maintain the greatest possible distance between one another, passing closest at the fewest places along their orbit, in such a way that the close points are as far apart as possible.... If only two planets existed, the orbits would likely be exactly commensurable (2 to 1, 3 to 2, or 4 to 3). Because planet 3 upsets the commensurability of 2 to 1, and planet 4 upsets 3 and 2, etc., the nearly commensurable condition found in the solar system persists. In the literature, this commensurability has been described as the Principle of Least Interaction Action (or perhaps the least attraction). A superior description is that the planets REPEL ONE ANOTHER AS STRONGLY AS POSSIBLE. (1) The motion of the subatomic particles, the electrons and protons - - which possess opposite electrical charges, indicates that both behave alike and travel together away from the Sun, although they sometimes also move toward the Sun. In the magnetic field of space, one would expect that electrons would always move in the opposite direction as the protons. Since this is not the case in space, far from the planets, this phenomenon appears to support the view that space is a superconducting medium. Finally, with respect to the Sun, we observe the behavior of solar prominences that arc above the Sun. However, when two solar prominences encounter one another, they violently repel each other. If the temperature above the solar photosphere, where the prominences encounter each other, is cold enough, this may also support the concept being discussed. I have suggested that electromagnetic fields in space, based on Electro-Gravitic theory, always repel. In this small presentation is perhaps a mechanism that - - when tested in space - - will be found to have validity.
_Reference
1. Earl R. Milton, "Saturn and Voyager," KRONOS VI: 3 (Spring 1981): 61. \cdrom
40. Ice Core Evidence [The Velikovskian]
_From: The Velikovskian Vol 2 No 4 (1994) Home¦ Issue Contents Ice Core Evidence Charles Ginenthal
_The debate over ice core data has spanned many years. I have reexamined the record and analysed the evidence in terms of Velikovsky's scenario. What I have found is that his critics, who have raised this ice core evidence, have based their objections on uniformitarian concepts and have ignored Velikovsky's scenario. In reality, the data supports Velikovsky's catastrophic scenario and contradicts the uniformitarian interpretation completely. In 1977, R. G. A. Dolby sent an article to the Society for Interdisciplinary Studies Review (SISR), submitting the view that, if Velikovsky's Venus catastrophe had occurred, then volcanic and cometary materials should appear "visible at the appropriate depth in the cores recently collected" from Greenland and Antarctica. (1) C. Leroy Ellenberger picked up this suggestion and presented the case against Velikovsky's catastrophic scenario in the Fall, 1984, issue of KRONOS. In this piece, Ellenberger explained that snow falling off the Greenland glacier would contain different amounts of oxygen-16 and oxygen-18 because of seasonal variations in temperature. Ice formed from summer snowfalls would be enriched by the heavier oxygen-18 isotope, whereas ice formed from winter snow would be enriched by the lighter oxygen-16 isotope. (2) He also explained how other signals in the ice could be used to determine the validity of Velikovsky's scenario: As a test of Velikovsky's scenario of historical catastrophes, the initial expectation was that the ice would preserve a series of conspicuous dust layers of cometary origin at the proper level. Such dust layers are not in evidence, but other signs of catastrophism could take the place of the missing dust. Extreme acidity peaks are produced by major volcanic eruptions, which inject volcanic acid gases into the stratosphere. These gases travel to high latitudes, being converted to acid en route, and are incorporated in the ice through snowfall. This deposition can be detected either as elevated, specific conductivities measured on melted ice samples or as elevated acidities revealed by an electric current through the solid ice. Every major, known, historically-dated eruption since AD 536 is attested [to] in Greenland ice cores at the correct level....lf, as Velikovsky repeatedly stated, "all volcanoes vomit[ed] lava" at the time of the Exodus..., then unequivocal evidence for such activity would be expected to be found in the Greenland ice cores, but it is not. Volcanic acid fallout in Greenland identified with ancient eruptions in the Velikovskian time frame is comparable in amount to that associated with single, recent volcanic eruptions. This is not what is expected if catastrophes of the magnitude envisioned by Velikovsky actually happened. In fact, according to the Greenland ice cores, major eruptions have been four times more frequent in the past 2000 years.... (3) (Emphasis added.) In the January and July, 1990, issues of Catastrophism and Ancient History (CAH), Sean Mewhinney analysed both viewpoints and attacked Lynn E. Rose, Bernard Newgrosh, Alfred De Grazia, Clark Whelton and me for, among other things, supposedly ignoring the accuracy and strength of the ice core evidence. Mewhinney also claimed that oygen-16 and oygen-18 dominate yearly layers in the ice cores and presented the view that this evidence clearly denied Velikovsky's catastrophic scenario. He also pointed to dust and hydrocarbons missing from the appropriate depths in the ice cores and the weakness or missing signals from volcanic acid at these same depths. Ever since publishing Carl Sagan and Immanuel Velikovsky, printed in late August, 1990, and distributed in October of that same year, I have stated my belief that ____the icecaps of Greenland and Antarctica were created recently - - a belief based on information from ancient maps and the discoveries made by Arlington Mallery and Charles H. Hapgood. (4) I believe that the accuracy of these ancient maps, as confirmed by professional cartographers and by seismic studies carried out by professional seismologists, proves that the icecaps of Greenland and Antarctica cannot be as old as Mewhinney and Ellenberger indicate. Furthermore, I entirely disagree with Dolby, Ellenberger and Mewhinney that the icecaps of Greenland and Antarctica were built up gradually, prior to Velikovsky's Venus catastrophe, 3,500 years ago. Velikovsky claimed that the icecaps were built up suddenly and catastrophically. Venusian planetary dust and volcanic acid, and Earth dust (distributed by hurricanes with stupendous snowfalls), precipitated over these regions. This is based on what Velikovsky actually wrote. Sea levels fell 20 feet. I believe that parts of the sea floor fell to an even greater depth while inland sections of continents rose. ____Evidence for oceanic, sea-floor subsidence is found for undersea mountains or seamounts, which contain surface materials, such as corals, that are now a kilometre below the surface of the Atlantic Ocean: Exploration of the New England Seamount chain by the research submarine Alvin confirms that some of these peaks, now all a kilometre or more below the surface, were once at or above the surface of the ocean. This undersea mountain chain contains more than 30 major peaks and stretches 1,600 miles southeast from the New England coast. Deep sea dredging has previously brought up Eocene limestone of shallow-water origin from the submerged mountain tops [attributed] to iceberg detritus carried off the continents but the Alvin exploration resulted in the first eye witness accounts of dead coral algae that grows only within 100 meters of the surface. The New England Seamounts have, therefore, either subsided on the order of a kilometre [(3,281 feet) since Eocene times or the sea level has altered drastically. (5) Coral reefs and platforms grow so rapidly that their growth outstrips sea floor spreading, geological subsidence of the sea floor or gradual rises in sea levels. This, then, is the problem. All over the oceans, the record indicated deep coral platforms, suggesting that the sea floor sank or that extraordinary amounts of water were added catastrophically. Wolfgang Schlager concluded that gradualistic processes are inadequate and had suggested that violent methods must have been employed so as to create these drowned coral reefs. (6) He explained that the growth rate of corals is 1,000µm/ yr [micrometers per year], which exceeds any relative rise in sea level caused by long-term processes in the geological record. Newly formed ocean crust subsidence is at a maximum rate of 250µm/ yr, basic subsidence averages 10 to 100µm/ yr and sea level rises, due to increased sea floor spreading to less than 10µm/ yr. (7) In essence, singly or all together, these processes will not drown coral reefs or carbonate platforms. Schlager showed that these formations are found all over the Earth. Thus, in ocean regions, we have evidence that the sea floor sank to great depths. This evidence suggests that the ocean basins dropped by a phenomenon not related to gradualistic processes. It indicates that these coral reefs and carbonate platforms sank rapidly or catastrophically to great depths. From the grand old man of oceanography, Francis P. Shepherd, who has spent 50 years of his life studying submarine canyons, we learned that the immense canyons running off the continental shelf and deep into the oceans from all continents were carved by subaerial water. According to Shepherd, Pleistocene geologists are wrong to deny that many of these canyons were above the ocean surface, were cut by rivers and then sank below the present sea level. (8) Douglas W. Johnson provided this provocative statement supporting Shepherd's conclusions: The most obvious explanation of submarine canyons, offered more than [50] years ago and still regarded by many investigators as the one most probably correct, is that they are normal, young river valleys or gorges carved during higher stands of the continents or a lower stand of sea level and deeply submerged in comparatively recent geologic time. (9) The only reason for rejecting this hypothesis is the catastrophic requirement inherent in lowering these canyons deep below the oceans. Using straightforward geophysical evidence, Johnson then showed how neither turbidity currents, nor land slides, nor submarine spring sapping can account for the creation of these remarkable sea canyons. (10) What Ellenberger and Mewhinney have done is apply uniformitarian theory to a catastrophic scenario. The fundamental evidence negates Ellenberger and Mewhinney's analysis definitively but supports Velikovsky's scenario completely! Rose was greatly taken to task by Ellenberger and Mewhinney for his extremely sceptical views regarding the accuracy of the ice cores. They did this, as I will show, by ignoring fundamental evidence that invalidated their beliefs and assertions. For example, in Part II of "Still Facing Many Problems," Ellenberger claimed that the Milankovich theory for ice ages is definitively supported by Greenland ice cores and disproves Velikovsky's 3,500-year-old date: "Velikovsky's timetable for the last glaciation is decisively disproved by the oxygen isotope profiles in the Greenland icecap, which indicate that the temperatures reached their present general level about 10,000 years ago." (11) If this is so, then other accurate cores which measure the same climate periods of the Milankovich theory should corroborate the ice cores. This is very important with respect to oxygen-16 and oxygen-18 content in other cores. Ellenberger has claimed that there has been "no serious, informed challenge to the modern Milankovich model...." (12) But what has not been discussed, as far as I know, is that there is another crucial and superior core of material which also contains layers of oxygen-16 and oxygen 18. This does not agree with the Milankovich theory as applied to the icecaps or deep sea cores and makes the ice core data unreliable, contrary to what Ellenberger and Mewhinney suggest. According to Richard Monastersky: For the last 15 years, most climate researchers have looked to space for an explanation of the ice ages that have repeatedly gripped our planet in recent geologic times. The established theory, called the Milankovich hypothesis, holds that wiggles and wobbles in Earth's orbit serve as a pacemaker that determines when the planet plunges into a glacial period and when it thaws out of one. But new evidence from a deep crack in the Nevada Desert threatens to overturn the Milankovich theory and replace it with a more down-to-Earth solution. 'We feel that the Milankovich theory is incapable of explaining the climate shift," says Isaac J. Winograd of the [United States] Geological Survey in Reston, [Virginia].... The climate information collected by Winograd's group comes from Devil's Hole.... The fissure is filled with mineral-rich water that has coated the rock walls with layer upon layer of calcite over the last 500,000 years.... By analysing the ratio of two isotopes - - oxygen-18 and oxygen-16 - - at hundreds of spots along the calcite core, Winograd and his colleagues identified changes in the temperature of the atmosphere when rain fell in the Devil's Hole region.... But the Devil's Hole record, with its superior chronology, shows that the timing of specific events in the last 500,000 years does not match the predictions of the Milankovich theory.... (13) In spite of this clear denial of Milankovich, Caesare Emiliani attempted to interpret the Devil's Hole findings in terms of Milankovich but was shown to be wrong by the scientists who had carried out the research. In a letter to Nature, they stated: We are puzzled by the table in the Scientific Correspondence by Emiliani. He rejects the conventionally used terminations (glacial, interglacial transitions) as time markers and focuses on bathythermals (the coldest portions of glacial cycles), which he deems to be sharper and, therefore, more precise time markers. He claims that bathythermals in the Devil's Hole 18 O chronology occur at times when the orbital parameters of [the Earth] obliquity [(axial tilt)] and eccentricity [to the Sun] are both low,... thereby supporting the Milankovich mechanism.... We show [in a table] ... the seven astronomical 'low" events that Emiliani gives.... We were puzzled as to why Emiliani omitted [from his table] two well-defined 'low" events ... and note that they do not correspond to bathythermals in either the Devil's Hole or the marine [deep ocean core] 18 O chronologies. Indeed, the 'low" [or coldest event] occurs during a peak interglacial time [when] it was warmest. We also note that Emiliani's designation of a 'low" event [for] two periods does not [even] fit the earlier stated definition. Also show[n] in the figure are the eight major 18 O minima, denoting times of full glacial climate, found in the Devil's Hole chronology, and the subset of six events that Emiliani gives ... in his table. He did not mention the two Devil's Hole isotope minima [at] the time periods which do not correspond to any astronomical 'low" event. In comparing the astronomical "low" events predicted by the specific definition with the minimal isotope events found in the Devil's Hole chronology, one sees that, although there are four "matches," there are six "non-matches," twice when a bathythermal would be predicted but did not happen and four times when one did occur but not during an astronomical "low" event. (14) What we have encountered are three dating methods, measuring oxygen-16 and oxygen-18, which contradict each other: one in ice layers in Greenland, one in an oceanic deep sea core and one in calcite layers in Nevada. If the measurements at Devil's Hole are correct and are called superior to the deep sea cores, then there is something seriously wrong with the data. Of course, some ad hoc theory will be put forth by establishment theorists to
...
same time, a [2 to 2.5 C] rise in ... the surface water [for] the molluscs to live and of the layer of air nearest [to] the ground ... has been very well demonstrated by a number of independently conducted studies using different methods. The permafrost, which covers the Arctic Basin, greatly deteriorated during the period of its warming. Thus, in the north and northwest of Siberia, the melting reached a depth of [200 to 300 meters]. The mountain glaciers diminished considerably and, in some places, disappeared altogether. How did the climate react to the disappearance of ice in the Arctic Basin? The vegetative zones advanced toward the pole. On the Eurasian continent, this latitudinal shift amounted to [4 to 5] in the west and to [1 to 2] in the east. Some plant species advanced their northern boundaries as much as 1,000 [kilometres]. Forests extended right up to the Barents Coast and the oak linden and filbert reached the shores of the White Sea. The information available warrants the assumption that, on the European continent, the tundra and forest-tundra zones disappeared completely. In the northern part of Asia, plant fossils were found only 80 [kilometres] from Cape Chelyuskin and peat-moss was discovered on Novaya Zemlya. ____In Inner Alaska and the Yukon, the absolute age of the peat deposits is estimated at 5,000 years. Hornwort has been found in deposits 5,400 years old, in northeast Canada, at a latitude of [64 19"N] and longitude [102 4'W]. Now hornwort only extends to latitude [59 14"N], a difference of 350 miles.... ____The culmination of the climate optimum of the Middle Holocene began to fade 4,000 years ago and ____the ice sheet of Arctic Basin began to reappear about 3,000 years ago. (35) (Emphasis added.) Velikovsky also documented warmer climate, up to the last catastrophe he described 2,800 years ago. (36) According to C. E. P. Brooks, the hipsithermal ended in one year with a climate catastrophe: Then came an unusually ... cold winter, the icecap obtained a footing, and perhaps in the course of a single season, covered the greater part of the Arctic Ocean. The result was a sudden great change in the climate of Europe; the conditions of today came in "with the appearance of a catastrophe." The icecap, once formed, kept the winter temperature below the critical point by its own power of persistence. (37) ____Since the Arctic climate, from around 8,000 to 2,800 years ago, was much warmer than at present and underwent a catastrophic end, this means that every summer, if there was an icecap covering Greenland prior to Velikovsky's catastrophe, it had to melt even more strongly, for longer summer periods, starting more to the north than at present, but the amount of the melting occurred during the entire period of Velikovsky's catastrophic scenarios. This precludes that any uncontaminated signal of the climate could be derived from any ice of this period in Greenland. Ice melts for seven to eight weeks at Thule presently. Because it was warmer during this period, both the ice and the snow-firn layer had to have melted much more than at present. In KRONOS, Rose showed that one must drill in a region of little to no summer melting so as to meet acceptable criteria to evaluate climate from ice layers. Rose stated one of the drill site requirements for proper analysis of the climate records: "It had to be at a spot far enough north that there was negligible summer melting." (38) Based on all of the above, there would have been extensive summer melting on the entire Greenland icecap from 8,000 to 2,800 years ago, or during the entire period of Velikovsky's catastrophes, if the icecaps existed. But Ellenberger and Mewhinney are oblivious to this, saying that they will determine climate evidence from ice that experts say should not show extensive summer melting. As Hans Oeschger explained, the Dye 3 ice core exhibited temperature "changes during the Wisconsin [Ice Age], which need further confirmation by measurements on other ice cores to exclude artifacts due to melt layers." (39) (Emphasis added.) This authority on ice cores claims that one must not assume temperature regimes from ice cores that have formed in areas of melt. However, long before the more northern cores were drilled in Greenland, Ellenberger and Mewhinney claimed that they knew the temperatures from cores which Oeschger had said needed confirmation. Therefore, even if the icecap existed before then which I strongly doubt because of the ancient maps, the case presented by Ellenberger and Mewhinney ignores the fundamental evidence of possible melting contamination. Furthermore, since this climatic optimum period encompassed the entire globe, then the same conditions had to pertain to the Antarctic icecap. Now, not only does water percolating through the snow-firn porous layers contaminate the snow and firn with false readings of oxygen-16 and oxygen-18, it also dilutes acids in the snow and firn layers. That is, if acid is introduced from volcanic activity in the northern hemisphere and is incorporated into snow which falls on the icecap, then it must not be diluted with water in order to remove it from its original position in the snow and firn layers. But yearly summer melting may do that, destroy the original acid signal and, maybe, deposit