Post by Admin on Jan 11, 2021 12:40:07 GMT
1. NEWBORN STAR - SATURN SYSTEM
2. NEWBORN STAR - SATURN SYSTEM MYTHS futureschool.boards.net/post/249/thread
3. NEWBORN STAR - VENUS futureschool.boards.net/post/250/thread
Chapter2
[CHAOS EXISTED BEFORE "CREATION"]
p.12
2. The Ruin of Earlier Worlds
ORDER OUT OF CHAOS
_... creation out of nothing is not even implied in Genesis. In fact, this applies to most other mytho-historical accounts of that same event....2
_... ancient man more than hinted at a pre-existing something. In effect, Creation was seen as having evolved from the wreckage of a preceding existence. A Vedic hymn from India states that "this All," which is often misconstrued to mean "the Universe," was "indiscriminated chaos."3 As it is there maintained: "All that existed then was void and formless.''4 Void and formless it might have been - at least in the eyes of ancient man - but it still existed. Thus, the Laws of Manu rightly inform us that, despite being "without form," the world - or what was later miscomprehended as the world - was believed to have already been in place.5
<<2 N. J. G. Sykes, "The Paradigm of the Electric Universe," Proceedings of the Natural Philosophy Alliance, Vol. 8 (Mount Airy, Maryland, 2011), p. 610.
<<3 Rig Veda, X: cxxix: 3.
<<4 Ibid., X: cxxix: 4.
<<5 P. Masson-Oursel & L. Morin, "Indian Mythology," New Larousse Encyclopedia of Mythology (London, 1972), p.344.
p.17
[FLUID CHAOS TO BURST OF LIGHT]
THE EGYPTIAN NU
_... why did ancient man resort to the idea of a physical "world" having been created out of a watery chaos? Why water? Why chaotic water? And why was it not thought necessary that this water should also have been created?
_In Egypt, not only was Creation believed to have unfolded out of the primeval water,1 the Creator, known as Atum, was himself believed to have risen from the water,2 which water was sanctified under the name Nu or Num.
_... as far as the Egyptians were concerned, it was actually the Creator himself who was the very "waters" out of which Creation was said to have unfolded.
_... the rising of Ra from the primeval waters was accompanied by the shedding of light from that very source.11
<<11 E. G. Suhr, The Spinning Aphrodite (N.Y., 1969), p. 44.
<<1 Ibid., p. 62.
<<2 Ibid.
<<11 Idem, The Egyptian Book of the Dead (N.Y., 1895/1967), p. xcix.
p.18
[BURST OF LIGHT]
_... This first burst of light is congruent with the light that was said to have been shed by Elohim in the very first lines of the Book of Genesis.2 Throughout the years, it remained emphasized in Rabbinic belief that "creation was made possible by the advance of the primordial light into the darkness of chaos."3
_In Egypt, however, so was the god Osiris acclaimed as the shedder of the primordial light.4 ... Osiris, very much like Ra, was celebrated as the Creator....
<<2 Genesis, I:3.
<<3 L. Ginzberg, The Legends of the Jews, Vol. V (Philadelphia, 1968), p. 112.
<<4 A. 0. Bolshakov, Man and His Double in Egyptian Ideology of the Old Kingdom (Germany, I 997), p. 184.
<<5 R. Van Over, Sun Songs: Creation Myths from Around the World (N.Y., 1980), p. 255.
p.20
["GOD" FORMED FROM CHAOS]
_And yet, the very same papyrus identifies Osiris as the very Nu from which the god was said to have sprung. "I am the great god Nu," he is there made to proclaim, "who gave birth unto himself."1 A spell from the Pyramid Texts also lauds Osiris as being synonymous with the "Sea" and/or the "Ocean." He was in fact supplied with both those epithets.2
[THE FLUID SATURN DISK] THE CELESTIAL WATERS
_That this watery chaos or primordial ocean was celestial in origin is evidenced by it being referred to as "the watery abyss of the sky."3 But then, in the Book of the Dead, Ra is made to utter: "I am the Great God who created himself." It is then asked: "Who is he?" And the answer is given: "The Great God who created himself in the water ..."4 For that reason, Ra was additionally known as Akeb-ur, the "god of the great celestial waters."5
<<1 R. Van Over, Sun Songs: Creation Myths from Around the World (N. Y ., 1980), p. 255.
<<2 R. O. Faulkner, The Ancient Egyptian Pyramid Texts (Stillwell, Kansas, 2007), p. 120.
<<3. E. A. W. Budge, op. cit., p. 251.
<<4 A. Piankoff, The Shrines o/Tut-Ankh-Amon (N.Y., 1955), p. 121 (emphasis added).
<<5 E. A. W. Budge, Osiris and the Egyptian Resurrection, Vol. I (N.Y., 1911/1973), p. 131.
p.21
[CREATION WAS CATACLYSMIC & SERIES OF CREATIONS] VIOLENT RE-CREATIONS
_... That creation consisted of a violent act is found embedded in the very Book of Genesis. There, in its very first verse, it is stated that: "In the beginning Elohim created the heaven and the Earth."4 What is not generally known is that the Hebrew word translated as "created," that is hara, which comes from an obsolete primitive root, has the etymological meaning of "forcing into shape," and contains a connotation of violence.5 For that reason the word is also used in the sense "to cut down," as of a tree, and "to dispatch."6 What this amounts to is that Elohim forced "the heaven and the earth" into shape violently. Not only did Creation not unfold out of nothing, neither did it do so peacefully.
_Genesis tells of only one Creation, but there are other Jewish sources that tell of a recurring series of Creations and destructions. According to one of these sources, God "made several worlds before ours, but He destroyed them all, because He was pleased with none until He created ours."7
<<4 Genesis I:1.
<<5 H. S. Bellamy, op. cit., p. 148.
<<6 J. Strong, Hebrew and Chaldee Dictionary (Madison, New Jersey, 1890), p. 23; see also L. Graham, Deceptions and Myths of the Bible (N. Y., 1979), p. 29.
<<7 L. Ginzberg, op. cit., Vol. I, p. 4.
p.27
[EL WAS ELOS = KRONOS = SATURN]
_... The first book of that Judeo-Christian opus contains the line with which we started the present work. "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth."5 The Hebrew word that has been translated as "God," however, is Elohim, which is the majestic plural of the Semitic deity known as El.6 The Greek transliteration of this name is Elos, the very god that Philo Byblius proclaimed to have been the same as Kronos,7 which was the Greek name for Saturn.8
<<5 Genesis I:1.
<<6 D. M. Rohl, A Test of Time: The Bible-From Myth to History (London, 1995), p. 228; D. Cardona, Metamorphic Star (Oregon, 2011), pp. 34-35.
<<7 L. Delaporte, "Phoenician Mythology," New Larousse Encyclopedia of Mythology (London, 1972), p. 83; see also W. A. Heidel, The Day of Yahweh (N.Y., 1929), p. 470.
<<8 J. O'Neill, The Night of the Gods (London, 1893), pp. 778-779.
p.31
[SATURN WAS A RED/BROWN DWARF STAR] THE PROTO-SATURNIAN SUN
_..._It was in the early 1940s that Immanuel Velikovsky posited that the planet Saturn had once been much larger than at present.8 Although he turned out to be in error on many an issue, he was definitely vindicated on this particular one. That the planet Saturn is the relic of what had previously been a brown dwarf star is now an accepted tenet of mainstream astronomy.9 As Maria Zapatero-Osorio reported at the tum of the present century, in time, devolving brown dwarf stars "will look like Jupiter and Saturn."10 And, as other astronomers found reason to state around the same time, sub-brown dwarfs, or Planetary Mass Objects, "give us a golden opportunity to see what Jupiter and Saturn were like in their youths."11
<<8 I. Velikovsky, "On Saturn and the Flood," KRONOSV:l (Fall 1979), p. 6.
<<9 A. P. Boss, Science (June 20, 1997).
<<10 M. Fox, "Rogue 'Gas Balls' in Space Break Rules of Solar System, Astronomers Find," The Vancouver Sun (October 6, 2000), p. A13.
<<11 R. Naeye, "Lonely Planets?" Astronomy (June 2003), p. 41.
p.32
[BROWN DWARFS OUTNUMBER STARS; SATURN WAS OBSERVED PREHISTORICALLY]
_... there are more brown dwarfs than Sun-like stars in our neighborhood alone, as many as 30 billion of them.2
_... humanity has known, and has kept track, of the planet Saturn since prehistoric times.3
<<2 A. Burrows, "Extrasolar Giant Planets and Brown Dwarfs," Science (August 6, 1999), pp. 847-848; S. Mohanty & R. Jayawardhana, "The Mystery of Brown Dwarf Origins," Scientific American (January 2006), p. 40; G. Basri, "A Decade of Brown Dwarfs," Sky & Telescope (May 2005), p. 38.
<<3 C. 0. Choi, "Mounting Mysteries at Saturn Keep Scientists Guessing," Space.com (August 27, 2007).
p.33
[SOME NEARBY BROWN DWARFS HAVE PLANETS]
_... That dwarf stars can be accompanied by planets had already become known at the tum of the present century.1 The first of these new planetary systems that came to light were found to be centered on red, rather than brown, dwarf stars.2 Before long, however, a planet was actually imaged in association with a brown dwarf.3 And that was only the beginning. In due course, another planet came to light around the nearby brown dwarf star designated GQ Lupi.4 And, as if that was not enough, an entire planetary system was eventually detected forming around a brown dwarf that is barely larger than a giant planet.5 There is, therefore, nothing unusual about Earth having been a satellite of the proto-Saturnian brown dwarf star.
_Brown dwarfs have actually "been spotted wandering through space fairly close to Earth."6 Very much like our posited proto-Saturnian sun, such brown dwarfs are actually floating freely outside the demarcation of the Solar System.
<<1 ESO insert in M. R. Zapatero Osorio, "Planets Without Suns," Astronomy (October 2006), p. 46.
<<2 1. Semeniuk, "Planet Quest," Sky News (September/October 2005), p. 12; M. Alpert, "Red Star Rising," Scientific American (November 2005), p. 36; see also, E. Baldwin, "Two Steps Closer to Finding Earth's Twin," Astronomy Now (June 2009), p. 66; T. Phillips, "Kepler Discovers a Tiny Solar System," Science@NASA Headline News (January 11, 2012).
<<3 D. Overbye, "Scientists Say Red Speck is Indeed Huge New Planet," The New York Times (April 30, 2005); D. Shiga, "Exoplanet Image Confirmed?" Sky & Telescope (April 2005), p. 22; F. Reddy, "Exoplanet Surprises" in "Top 10 Astronomy Stories of 2005," Astronomy (January 2006), p. 41; M. R. Zapatero Osorio, "Planets Without Suns," Astronomy (October 2006), p. 46.
<<4 R. Burnham, "First Exoplanet Imaged?" Astronomy (April 2005), p. 20.
<<5 New Scientist (February 12, 2005), p. 12.
<<6 V. Damgov, "Some Reflections on the Notion of Quantavolution," in I. Tresman (Ed.), Quantavolution: Challenges to Conventional Science (UK, 2010), p. 454.
p.34
[BROWN DWARFS SHINE DIMLY IN UV, ABLE TO SUPPORT LIFE]
_... As Vladimir Damgov, among others, has indicated: "Brown dwarfs generate enough heat to shine, but only dimly and in infrared light."2
_They also radiate highly in the ultraviolet spectrum that, together with infrared, would have been needed for the inception and sustenance of life.3
_Proto-Saturn would therefore have been hotter than the planet is at present. And, to be sure, it has not yet had enough time to eliminate all of its primordial heat. Even after the Cassini spacecraft had time to study the planet at close quarters, Saturn was still being claimed to be a "world that is hotter than it should be."4
...
[SATURN'S FORMER] CIRCUMSTELLAR DISK
_Judging by what our ancient ancestors remembered and passed on to their descendants, Earth's primordial sun was surrounded by a nebulous entity that we have conjectured to have been a circumstellar disk akin to those we now see surrounding stars. Needless to say, ancient man had no way of knowing what this nebulosity really was.
<<2 V. Damgov, Loc. cit.
<<3 W. Thornhill, "Stars in an Electric Universe," AEON, V:S (January 2000), p. 48.
<<4 D. Hawksett, "Discovering Saturn," Astronomy Now (July 2006), p. 60.
p.35
[SATURN WAS "CREATOR"] DIVINE INDEPENDENCE
_Saturn has not only been tracked by man since prehistoric times,12 it eventually became honored as the ruler of the planets.13 Much more than that, however, having been deified, it became man's primal god, especially since, for a while, it was his only one. From as far back as ancient man could remember, proto-Saturn was the only cosmic body that was visible in the sky. The present Sun was still too far away to have been seen, while the Moon had not yet been captured into orbit around Earth.
<<12 C. O. Choi, loc. cit.
<<13 M. Ratcliffe & A. Ling, "Saturn Rules the Night," Astronomy (January 2006), p. 60.
p.41
[SATURN WARMED THE ARCTIC OVER THE NORTH POLE]
_... Our own stand on this matter is the same as that of John Tarduno who was adamant in his claim that the Arctic was warm and ice free all year round.2 With our own contention that Earth's primordial brown dwarf sun had been permanently suspended above the north polar region, such perpetual warmth within the Arctic Circle is easily accounted for.
<<1 "Antarctic Fossil Shows Sauropod Dinosaurs Were Global ," newscientist.com (January 9, 2012). 2 M. Wall , "Tropical Turtle Fossil Discovered in the High Arctic," Wired Science at blog .wired.com (February 1, 2009), p. I.
p.46
[MANY ARCTIC DINOSAURS WERE LARGER]
_... Latitudinal differences also made for the larger size of the same dinosaurian species in the Arctic, some of which were twice as large as their siblings in more southerly locations.1
<<1 M. Harrison, "In Search of Akilia's Heel: The Controversy Over the Earliest Evidence for Life on Earth," paper given at the seminar sponsored by the School of Earth Sciences at the Australian National University (September 25, 2003); J. D. Archibald, Dinosaur Extinction and the End of an Era (Columbia University, 1996), p. 197.
Chapter 4
p.52
[SATURN'S ASTRAL JET]
Axial Polarity
THE PILLAR ON TOP OF THE WORLD
_Sustained plasma discharges in the form of Birkeland currents, usually referred to as astral jets, are now known to be axially emitted from galactic and stellar bodies including brown dwarf stars. That the brown dwarf star that acted as Earth's primordial sun emitted such a jet-or, at least, a scaled-down version of one-is more than implied by the mytho-historical record. As far as mankind was concerned, this so-called jet appeared as a slow-twirling narrow beam of tapering light that seemed to connect the proto-Saturnian orb to Earth's north polar region.1
<<1 D. Cardona, God Star (Victoria, British Columbia, 2006), pp. 429-439.
p.57
[JET AS NAIL]
_... Among the Scandinavians, the heavenly support was known as Veraldar Nagli, which translates as the "World Nail," but which was also known as the North Nail. As far as the Samoyeds, and others, were concerned, the "nail of the sky" was the North Star. So, also, to the ancient Finns, the North Star was likewise known as Bohinavlle, "the nail of the north." The Lapps, too, believe that this north nail, their Boahje-naste, is what supports the sky.3
_... even in ancient Persia, what is now Iran, do we find the North Star having been known as the "Nail in the Middle of the Sky."5
<<3 D. N. Talbott, op. cit., p. 58
<<5 Idem, "The World Axis as an Atmospheric Phenomenon," Cosmos: The Journal of the Traditional Cosmology Society, 21 (2005), p. 4.
p.60
[PERATT'S INTENSE AURORA]
... INTENSE SOLAR OUTBURSTS
_... [Anthony Peratt said,] "Ancient people had recorded [on petroglyphs] all the phases of a plasma discharge, a lightning stroke that must have been unprecedented in
intensity and duration"6 - which duration ... would have lasted "at least a few centuries if not millennia."7
_Originally, Peratt, too, had accepted that the plasmatic discharge witnessed by ancient man was not only planetary, but also polar.8 In time, however, he, too, began to avoid any association with planets, while favoring an emission of a columnar aurora, ....1
<<6 A. L. Peratt, as reported on the University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology "News release" in relation to the 2001 seminar titled "Celestial Catastrophes in Human Prehistory?"
<<7 Idem, "Characteristics for the Occurrence of a High-Current Z-Pinch Aurora as Recorded in Antiquity," IEEE Transactions on Plasma science, Vol. 31, No. 6 (December 2003), pp. 1211-1212.
<<1 A. L. Peratt, op. cit., Part II, IEEE Transactions on Plasma science, Vol. 35, No. 4 (August 2007), in toto.
p.62
[PLASMA FLUX TUBE]
[Io Flux Tube ase.tufts.edu/cosmos/pictures/May10/final/images/Fig9_16.jpg/]
_... Basing his theory on the flux tube that had been discovered stretching between Jupiter and its satellite Io,4 ... In Driscoll's theory, the electric bolts that he envisioned passing between approaching bodies would have ended up forming "a long narrow charge inside a plasma sheath," which charge would have glowed "like a heavenly spear."5 As Irving Wolfe paraphrased Driscoll's conclusion: "A tube containing an oscillating current would have been seen, which might have been the cosmic column 'writhing' with the presence of many bolts."6
_What Driscoll described back then is now known to be electrically-charged streams of ionized particles that cause the high-speed plasma flows that are often referred to as cosmic jets.7 Once thought to constitute rare phenomena, these plasma flows are now known to be "extremely common across the Universe."8 As far as the present study is concerned, it was one of these so-called flows that constituted the sustained plasma discharge in the form of Birkeland current that once bridged the gap between Earth and its primordial polar sun - in other words, the polar column under discussion.
<<4 I. Velikovsky, Worlds in Collision (N.Y., 1952), p. 387.
<<5 I. Wolfe, Loe. cit.
<<6 Ibid. (emphasis added).
<<7 "Cluster Observes Jet Braking and Plasma Heating," spacedaily.com/reports (July 5, 2011).
<<8 Ibid.
Chapter 5
p.63
[SATURN SYSTEM CAPTURED BY THE SUN]
Blowup
COSMIC INCURSIONS
_... it is now believed that there are billions of stars in our galaxy alone that have captured planets that once roamed through interstellar space.2
_Drawing on ancient, as well as Biblical, tradition, [Benoit de Maillet (1656-1738)] came to the conclusion that Earth had originally revolved around a star much smaller than the present Sun. It was, according to him, only later, at the time of the Noachian deluge, that Earth "left its original sun" to enter the present Solar System.5
<<2 "Some Stars Capture Rogue Planets," spacedaily.com (April 20, 2012).
<<5 S.S. Genuth, Comets, Popular Culture, and the Birth of Modern Cosmology (Princeton, New Jersey, 1997), p.202.
p.65
[EVIDENCE OF CAPTURE]
_While the ... Genesis Spacecraft discovered that the [Solar] System's inner planets, including Earth, do not contain the same ratios of oxygen and nitrogen as the Sun,1 the Interstellar Boundary Explorer - IBEX for short - found that the gases contained within the entire Solar System are different from those outside its boundaries.2
_David McComas is of the opinion that what IBEX brought to light could mean that the Solar System, including Earth, came into being in a different part of the galaxy than the one in which it is presently located.3 These findings supported the inferences derived from the composition of the Allende meteorite that landed in the state of Chihuahua, Mexico, in 1969. The calcium-aluminum-rich inclusions that this meteorite contains are held to be the oldest substances in the Solar System that could only have formed far away from where the Sun presently sits.4
_On the other hand, Kevin McKeegan is quite confident that what the information acquired by the Genesis Spacecraft implies is that Earth did not form out of the same nebulous material that created the Sun."5
_Bernard Marty, co-investigator of the Genesis discoveries, is of the same opinion. What the Genesis findings indicate, as far as he is concerned, is that "all solar system objects including the terrestrial planets, meteorites and comets are anomalous" when "compared to the initial composition of the nebula from which the solar system formed."6
_... what the above boils down to is that, while the Sun seems to have shifted its location within the Milky Way galaxy, some of its members, including Earth, had to have been captured into its chaotic family even later.
_The Sagittarius dwarf galaxy, ... is known to be presently slicing right through our Milky Way, ... through the very area occupied by our Solar System, which System is better aligned with the invader's ecliptic plane and axial orientation than with that of the Milky Way, [but] our alien galactic origin continues to be denied.
<<1 L. Kruesi, "Solar System Uncertainty," Astronomy (October 2011), p. 22.
<<2 I. Thomson, "Solar System May Have Alien Origin," theregister.co.uk (January 31, 2012).
<<3 Ibid.
<<4 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, "Oldest Objects in Solar System Indicate a Turbulent Beginning," physorg.com/news (March 3, 2011).
<<5 L. Kruesi, loc. cit.
<<6 D. Brown, "NASA Mission Suggests Sun and Planets Constructed Differently," jpl.nasa.gov!news (June 23, 2011).
p.68
[SATURN'S FLARE-UP = "CREATION"] DATING CREATION
_That proto-Saturn's flare-up was seen by ancient man as the supreme act that ushered in Creation, the mytho-historical record leaves no doubt.1 This event is not only recorded in the very first chapter of the Old Testament,2 it remained throughout time a steadfast principle of Rabbinic belief.3 Not only did it form "the starting point" of pharaonic Egypt's entire "mythological speculations,"4 it embedded itself in the religious dogmas of all ancient nations as it continues to be accentuated in modern ones as well.5
<<1 See, here, for instance, D. Teresi, Lost Discoveries: The Ancient Roots of Modern Science-From the Babylonians to the Maya (N. Y., 2002), p. 219; D. Cardona, Flare Star (Victoria, British Columbia, 2007), pp. 290 ff., where various sources are cited.
<<2 Genesis 1:3-4.
<<3 L. Ginzberg, The Legends of the Jews, Vol. V (Philadelphia, 1968), p. 112.
<<4 E. A. W. Budge, The Egyptian Book of the Dead (N. Y., 1895/1967), p. xcix.
<<5 D. Teresi, Zoe. cit.; D. Cardona, Flare Star (Victoria, British Columbia, 2007), pp. 290 ff., where various sources are cited.
p.76
[TIMELESS ERA]
_... the passage of time could not be calculated by anyone living on Earth during the period with which we are concerned. Since Earth was not in orbit around proto-Saturn, but lay suspended beneath its primary while sharing its rotational axis, the year was nonexistent. A day-night demarcation would also have been absent under those conditions. And since proto-Saturn itself had not yet begun to display its latitudinal atmospheric bands, it could not have been seen by ancient man to be rotating. Ancient man could not therefore have kept count of its gyrations. The only item in the sky that exhibited distinct markings was proto-Saturn's circumstellar disk, but its vaporous constituents would have been too chaotic in their constant convoluted transformations to be utilized as time markers.
_Given all that, there was no way by which to tell how long individuals could have lived, let alone keep track of their lineage. Worst of all, despite their reported multitudinous begetting, all Biblical characters from Adam to Abraham's father are mythical entities who never really trod on Earth.
Chapter6
p.78
[JET WITHDRAWAL; ATMOSPHERE THINNING]
Meteorological Intensity
AXIAL WITHDRAWAL
_As noted in a previous volume of this series, the first dramatic transformation that proto-Saturn's flare-up caused was the sudden retraction of its visible axial flux tube, the sustained Birkeland current that connected it to Earth.1 In fact, it is quite possible that this retraction was the actual impetus behind the flare since its withdrawal would have been the direct result of the electric discharge that was generated when proto-Saturn's plasmasphere came into sudden contact with the Solar System's heliospheric boundary. What transpired can be considered to have been a colossal short circuit that created an electric spark of cosmic proportions. There were many other cataclysmic changes that beset Earth's primordial sun, but the abrupt withdrawal of its axial column seems to have engendered all the ones that followed.
ATMOSPHERIC DIFFUSION
_One of the incidents that immediately resulted down on Earth due to the tremendous blast generated by proto-Saturn's axially directed flare was the partial dispersion of what was left of Earth's primordial atmosphere.2 This dispersion would not even have been noticed by the survivors of the incident since, if nothing else, temporarily or otherwise, the flare would have come close to blinding most of them. But even had this not been the case, the partial dispersion, and thus thinning, of the atmosphere would not itself have been all that obvious since most of it would have already been blown away by previous flares.3 What this implies, of course, as quite a few investigators have proposed, is that, originally, Earth's atmosphere was much denser than it is at present,4 concerning which Frederic Jueneman coined the term Pleiongaea-meaning "More Earth."5
<<1 D. Cardona, Flare Star (Victoria, British Columbia, 2007), pp. 279 ff. for a detailed discussion of this event.
<<2 See idem, Metamorphic Star (Oregon, 2011), pp. 123-125 for more on this.
<<3 Idem, Primordial Star (Victoria, British Columbia, 2009), pp. 82 ff.
<<4 T. Owen, "The Origins and Early Histories of Planetary Atmospheres," Bulletin of the American Physical Society (July-August 1981), p. 801; D. Norman, Dinosaur! (N. Y., 1991), pp. 74, 218; I. C. Johnson, "Long Term Violation of Uniformitarianism Demonstrated by Fossil Discoveries in Polar regions," Chronology & Catastrophism Workshop (1991:2), p. 21; R. W. Wescott, "Puzzles of Prehistory," The Velikovskian 1:3 (1993), pp. 20-21; R. B. Driscoll, "Magnetic Models of the Polar Configuration," AEON IV:2 (August 1995), p. 22; S. Menon, "Insects of the Oxygeniferous," Discover (September 1995), pp. 30-35; T. Dickinson, "The Seeds of Life," Equinox (July 1997), p. 74; R. Dudley, "Atmospheric Oxygen, Giant Paleozoic Insects and the Evolution of Aerial Locomotor Performance," The Journal of Experimental Biology (April 15, 1998), pp. 1043-1050.
<<5 F. B. Jueneman, "Pleiongaea: A Myth For All Seasons," AEON 11:3 (January 1991), pp. 21 ff.; idem, "Pterodactyles in the Mesozoic: A Flap in Time," AEONV:2 (April 1998), pp. 21-22.
-----
YOUNGER DRYAS
p.33 ____Younger Dryas, which claim that cosmic impacts are more likely to produce a cooling, rather than a warming, effect - neither of which is here held to be correct.
p.106 ... the sudden emission of proto-Saturn's heat did not result in a relentless summer down into the present, since the vast amount of dust that its flare-up also released was captured in Earth's atmosphere due to gravitational attraction. What resulted then was a provisional return to a cold climate that has gone down in geological history as the ____Younger Dryas.
p.107 ... this new study provided "further evidence" that the re-freezing of the ____Younger Dryas by some sort of cosmic impact "may not be such a far-fetched notion," even though the microscopic spherules at the heart of the controversy were now found to have been "formed from earth materials" rather than from cosmic ones. Despite that, however, the spherules were still judged to have been probably due to an extreme cosmic impact,7 even though, as Lecompte himself admits, it "falls short of proof positive."8
<<7 "Comet May Have Exploded Over Canada 12,900 Years Ago After All," sciencedaily.com (September 18, 2012).
<<8 M. Shipman, "New Research Findings Consistent With Theory of Impact Event 12,900 Years Ago," North Carolina State University at ncsu.edulabstract/science, (September 24, 2012).
p.108 ... (our reconstruction of) Earth's cosmic history does not subscribe to cometary or meteoric impacts as the cause for the sudden re-freezing that led to the short-lived ____Younger Dryas event. After all, even Firestone was not really all that sure what was the real cause of the event.1 Nevertheless, as his colleague Allen West reported, "the evidence for some kind of cosmic event is overwhelming."2 Judging by the congruence of relative dates in relation to what else we have discovered to have occurred, the cosmic event behind the inception of the ____Younger Dryas would have been the same proto-Saturnian flare-up that brought the previous Ice Age to its end-or, to be more precise, the cosmic dust that enshrouded Earth in its aftermath.
_It is not that meteoric rubble did not impound the terrestrial surface. On the contrary, a multitude of such bodies-detritus from proto-Saturn's flare-up and its circumstellar disk-hurtled through Earth's atmosphere, producing a series of air-shocks that scoured the land in various regions.
_Among these cratered areas was the North Sea, the very region that had originally been occupied by Doggerland. The Storegga Slide we discussed above could therefore have been caused by this train of exploding bolides....
<<2 I. Semeniuk, op. cit., p. 21.
p.128-129 ... EXODUS NORTH
_The early southern migrations we have been discussing have been debated since the nineteenth century. One of the earliest among these debaters was the botanist Gaston de Saporta. Although some of the evidence he presented did not hold up through the years, what had already come to light toward the end of the nineteenth century was already enough to convince him that these migrations had to have stemmed from what he termed a "mother-region." And although, according to him, that region was "still undetermined," he had no doubts that it had "to have been in the North," from where humanity "radiated in several directions."6
_... This northward movement of peoples across Europe received additional impetus from DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) studies, something that was entirely unknown in de Saporta's time. He had no way of knowing that traces of this genetic molecule would allow a new branch of science, now known as archaeogenetics, to trace the lineages of entire populations across vast distances and time . These studies have now validated the northward migration of entire European populations at the end of the ____Younger Dryas period.1
<<1 C. Renfrew , "Archaeogenetics- Towards a 'New Synthesis'?" Current Biology (February 23, 2010), p. Rl64.
p.130-131 ... CAUSE AND EFFECT
_Tremendous climatic changes around the world have accompanied the slow inception of ice ages throughout time as well as their relatively sudden end. This had been known for many years, but, with the progress of excavation in the affected regions, despite those who have continued to combat it, the accumulated evidence has validated its cause as having been cosmically induced. As it was reported at the very time this book was being written: "Research published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences finds evidence of a major cosmic event near the end of the Ice Age. The ensuing climate change forced many species to adapt or die."4
_Exactly what this cosmic event was, these researchers claim, remains "unclear," even though they were still opting for cometary, asteroidal, or meteoric splinters. Since, to us, the event in question was proto-Saturn's flare-up, it comes as no surprise that research now indicates it to have been severe enough to have "scorched the air, melted bedrock and altered the course of Earth's history."5
_That this was more of a direct cosmic blast than the showering of minor discharges from splintered cosmic bodies is evidenced by the nature of the much disputed molten spherules that have been retrieved from the ____Younger Dryas Boundary. As those who are themselves concerned with their validity have noted, these spherules have been well analyzed and compared to similar ones that have been produced by atomic explosions such as the 1945 Trinity detonation in New Mexico.1 This, alone, should have told the researchers that the Ice Age terminating blast had to have been something much more powerful than minor discharges from cosmic debris. Proto-Saturn's radiant flare-up would have more than filled the bill. As if to clinch the matter, it has more recently been established that, to this day, Saturn remains much brighter than expected for a planet of its supposed age.
1 I. Sample, "European and Asian Languages Traced Back to Single Mother Tongue," guardian.co.uk (May 6, 2013).
<<4 T. Robinette, "The Mammoth's Lament: UC Research Shows How Cosmic Impact Sparked Devastating
Climate Change," eurekalert.org (May 20, 2013).
<<5 Ibid.
<<1 J. H. Wittke, "Evidence for Deposition of 10 Million Tonnes of Impact Spherules Across Four Continents 12,800 Y[ears] Ago," pnas.org (April 9, 2013), p. 2.
<<1 "Scientists Reveal Saturn's Youthful Appearance is the Result of Layered Convection," scitechdaily.com (May 1, 2013).
2. NEWBORN STAR - SATURN SYSTEM MYTHS futureschool.boards.net/post/249/thread
3. NEWBORN STAR - VENUS futureschool.boards.net/post/250/thread
Chapter2
[CHAOS EXISTED BEFORE "CREATION"]
p.12
2. The Ruin of Earlier Worlds
ORDER OUT OF CHAOS
_... creation out of nothing is not even implied in Genesis. In fact, this applies to most other mytho-historical accounts of that same event....2
_... ancient man more than hinted at a pre-existing something. In effect, Creation was seen as having evolved from the wreckage of a preceding existence. A Vedic hymn from India states that "this All," which is often misconstrued to mean "the Universe," was "indiscriminated chaos."3 As it is there maintained: "All that existed then was void and formless.''4 Void and formless it might have been - at least in the eyes of ancient man - but it still existed. Thus, the Laws of Manu rightly inform us that, despite being "without form," the world - or what was later miscomprehended as the world - was believed to have already been in place.5
<<2 N. J. G. Sykes, "The Paradigm of the Electric Universe," Proceedings of the Natural Philosophy Alliance, Vol. 8 (Mount Airy, Maryland, 2011), p. 610.
<<3 Rig Veda, X: cxxix: 3.
<<4 Ibid., X: cxxix: 4.
<<5 P. Masson-Oursel & L. Morin, "Indian Mythology," New Larousse Encyclopedia of Mythology (London, 1972), p.344.
p.17
[FLUID CHAOS TO BURST OF LIGHT]
THE EGYPTIAN NU
_... why did ancient man resort to the idea of a physical "world" having been created out of a watery chaos? Why water? Why chaotic water? And why was it not thought necessary that this water should also have been created?
_In Egypt, not only was Creation believed to have unfolded out of the primeval water,1 the Creator, known as Atum, was himself believed to have risen from the water,2 which water was sanctified under the name Nu or Num.
_... as far as the Egyptians were concerned, it was actually the Creator himself who was the very "waters" out of which Creation was said to have unfolded.
_... the rising of Ra from the primeval waters was accompanied by the shedding of light from that very source.11
<<11 E. G. Suhr, The Spinning Aphrodite (N.Y., 1969), p. 44.
<<1 Ibid., p. 62.
<<2 Ibid.
<<11 Idem, The Egyptian Book of the Dead (N.Y., 1895/1967), p. xcix.
p.18
[BURST OF LIGHT]
_... This first burst of light is congruent with the light that was said to have been shed by Elohim in the very first lines of the Book of Genesis.2 Throughout the years, it remained emphasized in Rabbinic belief that "creation was made possible by the advance of the primordial light into the darkness of chaos."3
_In Egypt, however, so was the god Osiris acclaimed as the shedder of the primordial light.4 ... Osiris, very much like Ra, was celebrated as the Creator....
<<2 Genesis, I:3.
<<3 L. Ginzberg, The Legends of the Jews, Vol. V (Philadelphia, 1968), p. 112.
<<4 A. 0. Bolshakov, Man and His Double in Egyptian Ideology of the Old Kingdom (Germany, I 997), p. 184.
<<5 R. Van Over, Sun Songs: Creation Myths from Around the World (N.Y., 1980), p. 255.
p.20
["GOD" FORMED FROM CHAOS]
_And yet, the very same papyrus identifies Osiris as the very Nu from which the god was said to have sprung. "I am the great god Nu," he is there made to proclaim, "who gave birth unto himself."1 A spell from the Pyramid Texts also lauds Osiris as being synonymous with the "Sea" and/or the "Ocean." He was in fact supplied with both those epithets.2
[THE FLUID SATURN DISK] THE CELESTIAL WATERS
_That this watery chaos or primordial ocean was celestial in origin is evidenced by it being referred to as "the watery abyss of the sky."3 But then, in the Book of the Dead, Ra is made to utter: "I am the Great God who created himself." It is then asked: "Who is he?" And the answer is given: "The Great God who created himself in the water ..."4 For that reason, Ra was additionally known as Akeb-ur, the "god of the great celestial waters."5
<<1 R. Van Over, Sun Songs: Creation Myths from Around the World (N. Y ., 1980), p. 255.
<<2 R. O. Faulkner, The Ancient Egyptian Pyramid Texts (Stillwell, Kansas, 2007), p. 120.
<<3. E. A. W. Budge, op. cit., p. 251.
<<4 A. Piankoff, The Shrines o/Tut-Ankh-Amon (N.Y., 1955), p. 121 (emphasis added).
<<5 E. A. W. Budge, Osiris and the Egyptian Resurrection, Vol. I (N.Y., 1911/1973), p. 131.
p.21
[CREATION WAS CATACLYSMIC & SERIES OF CREATIONS] VIOLENT RE-CREATIONS
_... That creation consisted of a violent act is found embedded in the very Book of Genesis. There, in its very first verse, it is stated that: "In the beginning Elohim created the heaven and the Earth."4 What is not generally known is that the Hebrew word translated as "created," that is hara, which comes from an obsolete primitive root, has the etymological meaning of "forcing into shape," and contains a connotation of violence.5 For that reason the word is also used in the sense "to cut down," as of a tree, and "to dispatch."6 What this amounts to is that Elohim forced "the heaven and the earth" into shape violently. Not only did Creation not unfold out of nothing, neither did it do so peacefully.
_Genesis tells of only one Creation, but there are other Jewish sources that tell of a recurring series of Creations and destructions. According to one of these sources, God "made several worlds before ours, but He destroyed them all, because He was pleased with none until He created ours."7
<<4 Genesis I:1.
<<5 H. S. Bellamy, op. cit., p. 148.
<<6 J. Strong, Hebrew and Chaldee Dictionary (Madison, New Jersey, 1890), p. 23; see also L. Graham, Deceptions and Myths of the Bible (N. Y., 1979), p. 29.
<<7 L. Ginzberg, op. cit., Vol. I, p. 4.
p.27
[EL WAS ELOS = KRONOS = SATURN]
_... The first book of that Judeo-Christian opus contains the line with which we started the present work. "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth."5 The Hebrew word that has been translated as "God," however, is Elohim, which is the majestic plural of the Semitic deity known as El.6 The Greek transliteration of this name is Elos, the very god that Philo Byblius proclaimed to have been the same as Kronos,7 which was the Greek name for Saturn.8
<<5 Genesis I:1.
<<6 D. M. Rohl, A Test of Time: The Bible-From Myth to History (London, 1995), p. 228; D. Cardona, Metamorphic Star (Oregon, 2011), pp. 34-35.
<<7 L. Delaporte, "Phoenician Mythology," New Larousse Encyclopedia of Mythology (London, 1972), p. 83; see also W. A. Heidel, The Day of Yahweh (N.Y., 1929), p. 470.
<<8 J. O'Neill, The Night of the Gods (London, 1893), pp. 778-779.
p.31
[SATURN WAS A RED/BROWN DWARF STAR] THE PROTO-SATURNIAN SUN
_..._It was in the early 1940s that Immanuel Velikovsky posited that the planet Saturn had once been much larger than at present.8 Although he turned out to be in error on many an issue, he was definitely vindicated on this particular one. That the planet Saturn is the relic of what had previously been a brown dwarf star is now an accepted tenet of mainstream astronomy.9 As Maria Zapatero-Osorio reported at the tum of the present century, in time, devolving brown dwarf stars "will look like Jupiter and Saturn."10 And, as other astronomers found reason to state around the same time, sub-brown dwarfs, or Planetary Mass Objects, "give us a golden opportunity to see what Jupiter and Saturn were like in their youths."11
<<8 I. Velikovsky, "On Saturn and the Flood," KRONOSV:l (Fall 1979), p. 6.
<<9 A. P. Boss, Science (June 20, 1997).
<<10 M. Fox, "Rogue 'Gas Balls' in Space Break Rules of Solar System, Astronomers Find," The Vancouver Sun (October 6, 2000), p. A13.
<<11 R. Naeye, "Lonely Planets?" Astronomy (June 2003), p. 41.
p.32
[BROWN DWARFS OUTNUMBER STARS; SATURN WAS OBSERVED PREHISTORICALLY]
_... there are more brown dwarfs than Sun-like stars in our neighborhood alone, as many as 30 billion of them.2
_... humanity has known, and has kept track, of the planet Saturn since prehistoric times.3
<<2 A. Burrows, "Extrasolar Giant Planets and Brown Dwarfs," Science (August 6, 1999), pp. 847-848; S. Mohanty & R. Jayawardhana, "The Mystery of Brown Dwarf Origins," Scientific American (January 2006), p. 40; G. Basri, "A Decade of Brown Dwarfs," Sky & Telescope (May 2005), p. 38.
<<3 C. 0. Choi, "Mounting Mysteries at Saturn Keep Scientists Guessing," Space.com (August 27, 2007).
p.33
[SOME NEARBY BROWN DWARFS HAVE PLANETS]
_... That dwarf stars can be accompanied by planets had already become known at the tum of the present century.1 The first of these new planetary systems that came to light were found to be centered on red, rather than brown, dwarf stars.2 Before long, however, a planet was actually imaged in association with a brown dwarf.3 And that was only the beginning. In due course, another planet came to light around the nearby brown dwarf star designated GQ Lupi.4 And, as if that was not enough, an entire planetary system was eventually detected forming around a brown dwarf that is barely larger than a giant planet.5 There is, therefore, nothing unusual about Earth having been a satellite of the proto-Saturnian brown dwarf star.
_Brown dwarfs have actually "been spotted wandering through space fairly close to Earth."6 Very much like our posited proto-Saturnian sun, such brown dwarfs are actually floating freely outside the demarcation of the Solar System.
<<1 ESO insert in M. R. Zapatero Osorio, "Planets Without Suns," Astronomy (October 2006), p. 46.
<<2 1. Semeniuk, "Planet Quest," Sky News (September/October 2005), p. 12; M. Alpert, "Red Star Rising," Scientific American (November 2005), p. 36; see also, E. Baldwin, "Two Steps Closer to Finding Earth's Twin," Astronomy Now (June 2009), p. 66; T. Phillips, "Kepler Discovers a Tiny Solar System," Science@NASA Headline News (January 11, 2012).
<<3 D. Overbye, "Scientists Say Red Speck is Indeed Huge New Planet," The New York Times (April 30, 2005); D. Shiga, "Exoplanet Image Confirmed?" Sky & Telescope (April 2005), p. 22; F. Reddy, "Exoplanet Surprises" in "Top 10 Astronomy Stories of 2005," Astronomy (January 2006), p. 41; M. R. Zapatero Osorio, "Planets Without Suns," Astronomy (October 2006), p. 46.
<<4 R. Burnham, "First Exoplanet Imaged?" Astronomy (April 2005), p. 20.
<<5 New Scientist (February 12, 2005), p. 12.
<<6 V. Damgov, "Some Reflections on the Notion of Quantavolution," in I. Tresman (Ed.), Quantavolution: Challenges to Conventional Science (UK, 2010), p. 454.
p.34
[BROWN DWARFS SHINE DIMLY IN UV, ABLE TO SUPPORT LIFE]
_... As Vladimir Damgov, among others, has indicated: "Brown dwarfs generate enough heat to shine, but only dimly and in infrared light."2
_They also radiate highly in the ultraviolet spectrum that, together with infrared, would have been needed for the inception and sustenance of life.3
_Proto-Saturn would therefore have been hotter than the planet is at present. And, to be sure, it has not yet had enough time to eliminate all of its primordial heat. Even after the Cassini spacecraft had time to study the planet at close quarters, Saturn was still being claimed to be a "world that is hotter than it should be."4
...
[SATURN'S FORMER] CIRCUMSTELLAR DISK
_Judging by what our ancient ancestors remembered and passed on to their descendants, Earth's primordial sun was surrounded by a nebulous entity that we have conjectured to have been a circumstellar disk akin to those we now see surrounding stars. Needless to say, ancient man had no way of knowing what this nebulosity really was.
<<2 V. Damgov, Loc. cit.
<<3 W. Thornhill, "Stars in an Electric Universe," AEON, V:S (January 2000), p. 48.
<<4 D. Hawksett, "Discovering Saturn," Astronomy Now (July 2006), p. 60.
p.35
[SATURN WAS "CREATOR"] DIVINE INDEPENDENCE
_Saturn has not only been tracked by man since prehistoric times,12 it eventually became honored as the ruler of the planets.13 Much more than that, however, having been deified, it became man's primal god, especially since, for a while, it was his only one. From as far back as ancient man could remember, proto-Saturn was the only cosmic body that was visible in the sky. The present Sun was still too far away to have been seen, while the Moon had not yet been captured into orbit around Earth.
<<12 C. O. Choi, loc. cit.
<<13 M. Ratcliffe & A. Ling, "Saturn Rules the Night," Astronomy (January 2006), p. 60.
p.41
[SATURN WARMED THE ARCTIC OVER THE NORTH POLE]
_... Our own stand on this matter is the same as that of John Tarduno who was adamant in his claim that the Arctic was warm and ice free all year round.2 With our own contention that Earth's primordial brown dwarf sun had been permanently suspended above the north polar region, such perpetual warmth within the Arctic Circle is easily accounted for.
<<1 "Antarctic Fossil Shows Sauropod Dinosaurs Were Global ," newscientist.com (January 9, 2012). 2 M. Wall , "Tropical Turtle Fossil Discovered in the High Arctic," Wired Science at blog .wired.com (February 1, 2009), p. I.
p.46
[MANY ARCTIC DINOSAURS WERE LARGER]
_... Latitudinal differences also made for the larger size of the same dinosaurian species in the Arctic, some of which were twice as large as their siblings in more southerly locations.1
<<1 M. Harrison, "In Search of Akilia's Heel: The Controversy Over the Earliest Evidence for Life on Earth," paper given at the seminar sponsored by the School of Earth Sciences at the Australian National University (September 25, 2003); J. D. Archibald, Dinosaur Extinction and the End of an Era (Columbia University, 1996), p. 197.
Chapter 4
p.52
[SATURN'S ASTRAL JET]
Axial Polarity
THE PILLAR ON TOP OF THE WORLD
_Sustained plasma discharges in the form of Birkeland currents, usually referred to as astral jets, are now known to be axially emitted from galactic and stellar bodies including brown dwarf stars. That the brown dwarf star that acted as Earth's primordial sun emitted such a jet-or, at least, a scaled-down version of one-is more than implied by the mytho-historical record. As far as mankind was concerned, this so-called jet appeared as a slow-twirling narrow beam of tapering light that seemed to connect the proto-Saturnian orb to Earth's north polar region.1
<<1 D. Cardona, God Star (Victoria, British Columbia, 2006), pp. 429-439.
p.57
[JET AS NAIL]
_... Among the Scandinavians, the heavenly support was known as Veraldar Nagli, which translates as the "World Nail," but which was also known as the North Nail. As far as the Samoyeds, and others, were concerned, the "nail of the sky" was the North Star. So, also, to the ancient Finns, the North Star was likewise known as Bohinavlle, "the nail of the north." The Lapps, too, believe that this north nail, their Boahje-naste, is what supports the sky.3
_... even in ancient Persia, what is now Iran, do we find the North Star having been known as the "Nail in the Middle of the Sky."5
<<3 D. N. Talbott, op. cit., p. 58
<<5 Idem, "The World Axis as an Atmospheric Phenomenon," Cosmos: The Journal of the Traditional Cosmology Society, 21 (2005), p. 4.
p.60
[PERATT'S INTENSE AURORA]
... INTENSE SOLAR OUTBURSTS
_... [Anthony Peratt said,] "Ancient people had recorded [on petroglyphs] all the phases of a plasma discharge, a lightning stroke that must have been unprecedented in
intensity and duration"6 - which duration ... would have lasted "at least a few centuries if not millennia."7
_Originally, Peratt, too, had accepted that the plasmatic discharge witnessed by ancient man was not only planetary, but also polar.8 In time, however, he, too, began to avoid any association with planets, while favoring an emission of a columnar aurora, ....1
<<6 A. L. Peratt, as reported on the University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology "News release" in relation to the 2001 seminar titled "Celestial Catastrophes in Human Prehistory?"
<<7 Idem, "Characteristics for the Occurrence of a High-Current Z-Pinch Aurora as Recorded in Antiquity," IEEE Transactions on Plasma science, Vol. 31, No. 6 (December 2003), pp. 1211-1212.
<<1 A. L. Peratt, op. cit., Part II, IEEE Transactions on Plasma science, Vol. 35, No. 4 (August 2007), in toto.
p.62
[PLASMA FLUX TUBE]
[Io Flux Tube ase.tufts.edu/cosmos/pictures/May10/final/images/Fig9_16.jpg/]
_... Basing his theory on the flux tube that had been discovered stretching between Jupiter and its satellite Io,4 ... In Driscoll's theory, the electric bolts that he envisioned passing between approaching bodies would have ended up forming "a long narrow charge inside a plasma sheath," which charge would have glowed "like a heavenly spear."5 As Irving Wolfe paraphrased Driscoll's conclusion: "A tube containing an oscillating current would have been seen, which might have been the cosmic column 'writhing' with the presence of many bolts."6
_What Driscoll described back then is now known to be electrically-charged streams of ionized particles that cause the high-speed plasma flows that are often referred to as cosmic jets.7 Once thought to constitute rare phenomena, these plasma flows are now known to be "extremely common across the Universe."8 As far as the present study is concerned, it was one of these so-called flows that constituted the sustained plasma discharge in the form of Birkeland current that once bridged the gap between Earth and its primordial polar sun - in other words, the polar column under discussion.
<<4 I. Velikovsky, Worlds in Collision (N.Y., 1952), p. 387.
<<5 I. Wolfe, Loe. cit.
<<6 Ibid. (emphasis added).
<<7 "Cluster Observes Jet Braking and Plasma Heating," spacedaily.com/reports (July 5, 2011).
<<8 Ibid.
Chapter 5
p.63
[SATURN SYSTEM CAPTURED BY THE SUN]
Blowup
COSMIC INCURSIONS
_... it is now believed that there are billions of stars in our galaxy alone that have captured planets that once roamed through interstellar space.2
_Drawing on ancient, as well as Biblical, tradition, [Benoit de Maillet (1656-1738)] came to the conclusion that Earth had originally revolved around a star much smaller than the present Sun. It was, according to him, only later, at the time of the Noachian deluge, that Earth "left its original sun" to enter the present Solar System.5
<<2 "Some Stars Capture Rogue Planets," spacedaily.com (April 20, 2012).
<<5 S.S. Genuth, Comets, Popular Culture, and the Birth of Modern Cosmology (Princeton, New Jersey, 1997), p.202.
p.65
[EVIDENCE OF CAPTURE]
_While the ... Genesis Spacecraft discovered that the [Solar] System's inner planets, including Earth, do not contain the same ratios of oxygen and nitrogen as the Sun,1 the Interstellar Boundary Explorer - IBEX for short - found that the gases contained within the entire Solar System are different from those outside its boundaries.2
_David McComas is of the opinion that what IBEX brought to light could mean that the Solar System, including Earth, came into being in a different part of the galaxy than the one in which it is presently located.3 These findings supported the inferences derived from the composition of the Allende meteorite that landed in the state of Chihuahua, Mexico, in 1969. The calcium-aluminum-rich inclusions that this meteorite contains are held to be the oldest substances in the Solar System that could only have formed far away from where the Sun presently sits.4
_On the other hand, Kevin McKeegan is quite confident that what the information acquired by the Genesis Spacecraft implies is that Earth did not form out of the same nebulous material that created the Sun."5
_Bernard Marty, co-investigator of the Genesis discoveries, is of the same opinion. What the Genesis findings indicate, as far as he is concerned, is that "all solar system objects including the terrestrial planets, meteorites and comets are anomalous" when "compared to the initial composition of the nebula from which the solar system formed."6
_... what the above boils down to is that, while the Sun seems to have shifted its location within the Milky Way galaxy, some of its members, including Earth, had to have been captured into its chaotic family even later.
_The Sagittarius dwarf galaxy, ... is known to be presently slicing right through our Milky Way, ... through the very area occupied by our Solar System, which System is better aligned with the invader's ecliptic plane and axial orientation than with that of the Milky Way, [but] our alien galactic origin continues to be denied.
<<1 L. Kruesi, "Solar System Uncertainty," Astronomy (October 2011), p. 22.
<<2 I. Thomson, "Solar System May Have Alien Origin," theregister.co.uk (January 31, 2012).
<<3 Ibid.
<<4 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, "Oldest Objects in Solar System Indicate a Turbulent Beginning," physorg.com/news (March 3, 2011).
<<5 L. Kruesi, loc. cit.
<<6 D. Brown, "NASA Mission Suggests Sun and Planets Constructed Differently," jpl.nasa.gov!news (June 23, 2011).
p.68
[SATURN'S FLARE-UP = "CREATION"] DATING CREATION
_That proto-Saturn's flare-up was seen by ancient man as the supreme act that ushered in Creation, the mytho-historical record leaves no doubt.1 This event is not only recorded in the very first chapter of the Old Testament,2 it remained throughout time a steadfast principle of Rabbinic belief.3 Not only did it form "the starting point" of pharaonic Egypt's entire "mythological speculations,"4 it embedded itself in the religious dogmas of all ancient nations as it continues to be accentuated in modern ones as well.5
<<1 See, here, for instance, D. Teresi, Lost Discoveries: The Ancient Roots of Modern Science-From the Babylonians to the Maya (N. Y., 2002), p. 219; D. Cardona, Flare Star (Victoria, British Columbia, 2007), pp. 290 ff., where various sources are cited.
<<2 Genesis 1:3-4.
<<3 L. Ginzberg, The Legends of the Jews, Vol. V (Philadelphia, 1968), p. 112.
<<4 E. A. W. Budge, The Egyptian Book of the Dead (N. Y., 1895/1967), p. xcix.
<<5 D. Teresi, Zoe. cit.; D. Cardona, Flare Star (Victoria, British Columbia, 2007), pp. 290 ff., where various sources are cited.
p.76
[TIMELESS ERA]
_... the passage of time could not be calculated by anyone living on Earth during the period with which we are concerned. Since Earth was not in orbit around proto-Saturn, but lay suspended beneath its primary while sharing its rotational axis, the year was nonexistent. A day-night demarcation would also have been absent under those conditions. And since proto-Saturn itself had not yet begun to display its latitudinal atmospheric bands, it could not have been seen by ancient man to be rotating. Ancient man could not therefore have kept count of its gyrations. The only item in the sky that exhibited distinct markings was proto-Saturn's circumstellar disk, but its vaporous constituents would have been too chaotic in their constant convoluted transformations to be utilized as time markers.
_Given all that, there was no way by which to tell how long individuals could have lived, let alone keep track of their lineage. Worst of all, despite their reported multitudinous begetting, all Biblical characters from Adam to Abraham's father are mythical entities who never really trod on Earth.
Chapter6
p.78
[JET WITHDRAWAL; ATMOSPHERE THINNING]
Meteorological Intensity
AXIAL WITHDRAWAL
_As noted in a previous volume of this series, the first dramatic transformation that proto-Saturn's flare-up caused was the sudden retraction of its visible axial flux tube, the sustained Birkeland current that connected it to Earth.1 In fact, it is quite possible that this retraction was the actual impetus behind the flare since its withdrawal would have been the direct result of the electric discharge that was generated when proto-Saturn's plasmasphere came into sudden contact with the Solar System's heliospheric boundary. What transpired can be considered to have been a colossal short circuit that created an electric spark of cosmic proportions. There were many other cataclysmic changes that beset Earth's primordial sun, but the abrupt withdrawal of its axial column seems to have engendered all the ones that followed.
ATMOSPHERIC DIFFUSION
_One of the incidents that immediately resulted down on Earth due to the tremendous blast generated by proto-Saturn's axially directed flare was the partial dispersion of what was left of Earth's primordial atmosphere.2 This dispersion would not even have been noticed by the survivors of the incident since, if nothing else, temporarily or otherwise, the flare would have come close to blinding most of them. But even had this not been the case, the partial dispersion, and thus thinning, of the atmosphere would not itself have been all that obvious since most of it would have already been blown away by previous flares.3 What this implies, of course, as quite a few investigators have proposed, is that, originally, Earth's atmosphere was much denser than it is at present,4 concerning which Frederic Jueneman coined the term Pleiongaea-meaning "More Earth."5
<<1 D. Cardona, Flare Star (Victoria, British Columbia, 2007), pp. 279 ff. for a detailed discussion of this event.
<<2 See idem, Metamorphic Star (Oregon, 2011), pp. 123-125 for more on this.
<<3 Idem, Primordial Star (Victoria, British Columbia, 2009), pp. 82 ff.
<<4 T. Owen, "The Origins and Early Histories of Planetary Atmospheres," Bulletin of the American Physical Society (July-August 1981), p. 801; D. Norman, Dinosaur! (N. Y., 1991), pp. 74, 218; I. C. Johnson, "Long Term Violation of Uniformitarianism Demonstrated by Fossil Discoveries in Polar regions," Chronology & Catastrophism Workshop (1991:2), p. 21; R. W. Wescott, "Puzzles of Prehistory," The Velikovskian 1:3 (1993), pp. 20-21; R. B. Driscoll, "Magnetic Models of the Polar Configuration," AEON IV:2 (August 1995), p. 22; S. Menon, "Insects of the Oxygeniferous," Discover (September 1995), pp. 30-35; T. Dickinson, "The Seeds of Life," Equinox (July 1997), p. 74; R. Dudley, "Atmospheric Oxygen, Giant Paleozoic Insects and the Evolution of Aerial Locomotor Performance," The Journal of Experimental Biology (April 15, 1998), pp. 1043-1050.
<<5 F. B. Jueneman, "Pleiongaea: A Myth For All Seasons," AEON 11:3 (January 1991), pp. 21 ff.; idem, "Pterodactyles in the Mesozoic: A Flap in Time," AEONV:2 (April 1998), pp. 21-22.
-----
YOUNGER DRYAS
p.33 ____Younger Dryas, which claim that cosmic impacts are more likely to produce a cooling, rather than a warming, effect - neither of which is here held to be correct.
p.106 ... the sudden emission of proto-Saturn's heat did not result in a relentless summer down into the present, since the vast amount of dust that its flare-up also released was captured in Earth's atmosphere due to gravitational attraction. What resulted then was a provisional return to a cold climate that has gone down in geological history as the ____Younger Dryas.
p.107 ... this new study provided "further evidence" that the re-freezing of the ____Younger Dryas by some sort of cosmic impact "may not be such a far-fetched notion," even though the microscopic spherules at the heart of the controversy were now found to have been "formed from earth materials" rather than from cosmic ones. Despite that, however, the spherules were still judged to have been probably due to an extreme cosmic impact,7 even though, as Lecompte himself admits, it "falls short of proof positive."8
<<7 "Comet May Have Exploded Over Canada 12,900 Years Ago After All," sciencedaily.com (September 18, 2012).
<<8 M. Shipman, "New Research Findings Consistent With Theory of Impact Event 12,900 Years Ago," North Carolina State University at ncsu.edulabstract/science, (September 24, 2012).
p.108 ... (our reconstruction of) Earth's cosmic history does not subscribe to cometary or meteoric impacts as the cause for the sudden re-freezing that led to the short-lived ____Younger Dryas event. After all, even Firestone was not really all that sure what was the real cause of the event.1 Nevertheless, as his colleague Allen West reported, "the evidence for some kind of cosmic event is overwhelming."2 Judging by the congruence of relative dates in relation to what else we have discovered to have occurred, the cosmic event behind the inception of the ____Younger Dryas would have been the same proto-Saturnian flare-up that brought the previous Ice Age to its end-or, to be more precise, the cosmic dust that enshrouded Earth in its aftermath.
_It is not that meteoric rubble did not impound the terrestrial surface. On the contrary, a multitude of such bodies-detritus from proto-Saturn's flare-up and its circumstellar disk-hurtled through Earth's atmosphere, producing a series of air-shocks that scoured the land in various regions.
_Among these cratered areas was the North Sea, the very region that had originally been occupied by Doggerland. The Storegga Slide we discussed above could therefore have been caused by this train of exploding bolides....
<<2 I. Semeniuk, op. cit., p. 21.
p.128-129 ... EXODUS NORTH
_The early southern migrations we have been discussing have been debated since the nineteenth century. One of the earliest among these debaters was the botanist Gaston de Saporta. Although some of the evidence he presented did not hold up through the years, what had already come to light toward the end of the nineteenth century was already enough to convince him that these migrations had to have stemmed from what he termed a "mother-region." And although, according to him, that region was "still undetermined," he had no doubts that it had "to have been in the North," from where humanity "radiated in several directions."6
_... This northward movement of peoples across Europe received additional impetus from DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) studies, something that was entirely unknown in de Saporta's time. He had no way of knowing that traces of this genetic molecule would allow a new branch of science, now known as archaeogenetics, to trace the lineages of entire populations across vast distances and time . These studies have now validated the northward migration of entire European populations at the end of the ____Younger Dryas period.1
<<1 C. Renfrew , "Archaeogenetics- Towards a 'New Synthesis'?" Current Biology (February 23, 2010), p. Rl64.
p.130-131 ... CAUSE AND EFFECT
_Tremendous climatic changes around the world have accompanied the slow inception of ice ages throughout time as well as their relatively sudden end. This had been known for many years, but, with the progress of excavation in the affected regions, despite those who have continued to combat it, the accumulated evidence has validated its cause as having been cosmically induced. As it was reported at the very time this book was being written: "Research published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences finds evidence of a major cosmic event near the end of the Ice Age. The ensuing climate change forced many species to adapt or die."4
_Exactly what this cosmic event was, these researchers claim, remains "unclear," even though they were still opting for cometary, asteroidal, or meteoric splinters. Since, to us, the event in question was proto-Saturn's flare-up, it comes as no surprise that research now indicates it to have been severe enough to have "scorched the air, melted bedrock and altered the course of Earth's history."5
_That this was more of a direct cosmic blast than the showering of minor discharges from splintered cosmic bodies is evidenced by the nature of the much disputed molten spherules that have been retrieved from the ____Younger Dryas Boundary. As those who are themselves concerned with their validity have noted, these spherules have been well analyzed and compared to similar ones that have been produced by atomic explosions such as the 1945 Trinity detonation in New Mexico.1 This, alone, should have told the researchers that the Ice Age terminating blast had to have been something much more powerful than minor discharges from cosmic debris. Proto-Saturn's radiant flare-up would have more than filled the bill. As if to clinch the matter, it has more recently been established that, to this day, Saturn remains much brighter than expected for a planet of its supposed age.
1 I. Sample, "European and Asian Languages Traced Back to Single Mother Tongue," guardian.co.uk (May 6, 2013).
<<4 T. Robinette, "The Mammoth's Lament: UC Research Shows How Cosmic Impact Sparked Devastating
Climate Change," eurekalert.org (May 20, 2013).
<<5 Ibid.
<<1 J. H. Wittke, "Evidence for Deposition of 10 Million Tonnes of Impact Spherules Across Four Continents 12,800 Y[ears] Ago," pnas.org (April 9, 2013), p. 2.
<<1 "Scientists Reveal Saturn's Youthful Appearance is the Result of Layered Convection," scitechdaily.com (May 1, 2013).