1. 1st Age (<?>7k BP)

_1a. SATURN SYSTEM PLANETS ORIGIN - Formed by Electrical Implosion
_1a1. Earth formed in the Saturn System
_1a2. The Saturn System Formed by Electrical Implosion
_1a3. Earth had Weak Gravity Due to Tidal Forces

=====

_1a1. EARTH FORMED IN THE SATURN SYSTEM
<todo> See Myths re Saturn System Origin

-----

_1a2. THE SATURN SYSTEM FORMED BY ELECTRICAL IMPLOSION
_See CC re Accretion: qdl.scs-inc.us/?top=12692
- re Filaments: qdl.scs-inc.us/?top=15482

_<todo> Dating methods are highly unreliable, so the age of the universe, the ages of galaxies and stars, the age of the solar system etc are unknown.
_<todo> *See Cardona et al re unreliability of dating methods

ACCURACY OF DATING METHODS
1. Galaxies
2. Stars
3. Planets
4. Atmosphere
5. Lithosphere/Biosphere Dating Methods: a) U/Pb, b) St/ , c) K/Ar, d) C14
5c. K/Ar
Radio-dating in Rubble: The lava dome at Mount St Helens debunks dating methods, by Keith Swenson
creation.com/radio-dating-in-rubble
_The dating test
_When the method is tested on rocks of known age it fails miserably. In June of 1992, Dr Austin collected a 7-kg (15-lb) block of dacite from high on the lava dome. A portion of this sample was crushed and milled into a fine powder. Another piece was crushed and the various mineral crystals were carefully separated out.3 The ‘whole rock’ rock powder and four mineral concentrates were submitted for potassium-argon analysis to Geochron Laboratories of Cambridge, MA—a high-quality, professional radioisotope-dating laboratory. The only information provided to the laboratory was that the samples came from dacite and that ‘low argon’ should be expected. The laboratory was not told that the specimen came from the lava dome at Mount St Helens and was only 10 years old.
_The results of this analysis are shown in Table 1. What do we see? First and foremost that they are wrong. A correct answer would have been ‘zero argon’ indicating that the sample was too young to date by this method. Instead, the results ranged from 340,000 to 2.8 million years! Why? Obviously, the assumptions were wrong, and this invalidates the ‘dating’ method. Probably some argon-40 was incorporated into the rock initially, giving the appearance of great age. Note also that the results from the different samples of the same rock disagree with each other.
_It is clear that radioisotope dating is not the ‘gold standard’ of dating methods, or ‘proof’ for millions of years of Earth history. When the method is tested on rocks of known age, it fails miserably. The lava dome at Mount St Helens is not a million years old! At the time of the test, it was only about 10 years old. In this case we were there—we know! How then can we accept radiometric-dating results on rocks of unknown age? This challenges those who promote the faith of radioisotope dating....
_Table 1. Potassium-argon ‘ages’ for whole rock and mineral concentrate samples from the lava dome at Mount St Helens (from Austin1).
....... Sample ........ Age (millions of years)
1 Whole rock 0.35 ± 0.05
2 Feldspar, etc. 0.34 ± 0.06
3 Amphibole, etc. 0.9 ± 0.2
4 Pyroxene, etc. 1.7 ± 0.3
5 Pyroxene 2.8 ± 0.6

_THE PRESENT SATURN SYSTEM
_<notes> Saturn's Temperature Ranges: [Within] the clouds, temperatures increase to Earth-like conditions. At its core, scientists believe Saturn's temperature is more than 8,300 C (14,972 F), which is hotter than the surface of the sun. sciencing.com/saturns-temperature-ranges-7704.html

__1a2. CORRECTING MAINSTREAM COSMOLOGY ERRORS
_The Big Bang theory is wrong. It's based on the finding by Hubble that light from most other galaxies is redshifted. The Doppler effect causes redshifting when an object moves away at high velocity. But a high redshift object like a quasar existing in front of a low redshift object like a galaxy proves that redshift is not usually a Doppler effect. Instead it's a Compton effect, in which the redshift is due to high ionization.
_Black Hole and Neutron Star theory is wrong. It is assumed that gravity can overpower electrical forces between like charged protons and electrons which repel each other. But the assumption is contradicted by empirical evidence in the lab.
_Dating methods are highly unreliable, so the age of the universe, the ages of galaxies and stars, the age of the solar system etc are unknown.
_BACK TO THE SATURN SYSTEM.
_Saturn's Temperature Ranges: [Within] the clouds, temperatures increase to Earth-like conditions. At its core, scientists believe Saturn's temperature is more than 8,300 C (14,972 F), which is hotter than the surface of the sun. sciencing.com/saturns-temperature-ranges-7704.html

-----

_1a3. EARTH'S FORMER THICKER ATMOSPHERE & WEAKER GRAVITY
_<todo> See ?
_WEAK GRAVITY. Weak Gravity was Due to Tidal Forces
_See CC re Lunar Tides: qdl.scs-inc.us/?top=9925
_<todo> See Tiahuanaco discussion re Tidal Forces
futureschool.boards.net/thread/29/creationism-myth-catastrophism-thread-index
_See TIAHUANACO AND THE DELUGE, By Helmut Zettl www.crystalinks.com/tiahuanaco2.html
_See The calendar of Tiahuanaco: a disquisition on the time measuring system of the oldest civilization in the world,
by H. S. Bellamy and P. Allan, 1956 catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/001875470
<todo> Find out under what conditions tidal forces would cause weak gravity
_<todo> GIGANTISM. The weak gravity produced gigantism

_1c. Pre-Flood Biosphere included Megafauna, Megaflora, Giant Insects and Normal Creatures
_1c1. Source of Creatures
_1c2. Earth had Thicker Atmosphere and Weak Gravity due to Tidal Forces

=====

1c. Pre-Flood Biosphere included Megafauna, Megaflora, Giant Insects and Normal Creatures
*Show fossils that indicate gigantism;
*See Cardona et al re unreliability of dating methods

-----

_1c1. Source of Creatures
.See my post on Colonization: SUPERCONTINENT COLONIZATION
thunderbolts.info/forum3/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=13&start=375#p3653

-----

_1c2. Earth had Thicker Atmosphere and Weak Gravity due to Tidal Forces
_<todo> *See re Thicker Atmosphere ?
_See CC re Lunar Tides: qdl.scs-inc.us/?top=9925
_<todo> See Tiahuanaco discussion re Tidal Forces
futureschool.boards.net/thread/29/creationism-myth-catastrophism-thread-index
_<todo> See TIAHUANACO AND THE DELUGE, By Helmut Zettl www.crystalinks.com/tiahuanaco2.html
_<todo> See The calendar of Tiahuanaco: a disquisition on the time measuring system of the oldest civilization in the world,
by H. S. Bellamy and P. Allan, 1956 catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/001875470
<todo> Find out under what conditions tidal forces would cause weak gravity